These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18254416)

  • 1. Primary tooth length determination in direct digital radiography: an in vivo study.
    Santos-Pinto L; Cordeiro Rde C; Zuanon AC; Basso MD; Gonçalves MA
    Pediatr Dent; 2007; 29(6):470-4. PubMed ID: 18254416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Digital radiography for determination of primary tooth length: in vivo and ex vivo studies.
    Basso MD; Jeremias F; Cordeiro RC; Santos-Pinto L
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2015; 2015():939045. PubMed ID: 25802894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Root canal length determination by different methods in primary teeth: an in vivo study.
    Wankhade AD; Kumar R; Singh RK; Chandra A
    Pediatr Dent; 2013; 35(2):E38-42. PubMed ID: 23635968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cone-beam computed tomographic scans in comparison with periapical radiographs for root canal length measurement: an in situ study.
    Metska ME; Liem VM; Parsa A; Koolstra JH; Wesselink PR; Ozok AR
    J Endod; 2014 Aug; 40(8):1206-9. PubMed ID: 25069934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ex vivo performance of five methods for root canal length determination in primary anterior teeth.
    Mello-Moura AC; Moura-Netto C; Araki AT; Guedes-Pinto AC; Mendes FM
    Int Endod J; 2010 Feb; 43(2):142-7. PubMed ID: 20078703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An in vitro comparison of root canal measurement in primary teeth.
    Subramaniam P; Konde S; Mandanna DK
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2005 Sep; 23(3):124-5. PubMed ID: 16224130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison between conventional and digital radiography in root canal working length determination.
    Farida A; Maryam E; Ali M; Ehsan M; Sajad Y; Soraya K
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(2):229-33. PubMed ID: 23965452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electronic determination of root canal length in primary teeth with and without root resorption.
    Mente J; Seidel J; Buchalla W; Koch MJ
    Int Endod J; 2002 May; 35(5):447-52. PubMed ID: 12059916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Working length determination in palatal roots of maxillary molars.
    Kim-Park MA; Baughan LW; Hartwell GR
    J Endod; 2003 Jan; 29(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 12540223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of Pulp Chamber Dimensions of Primary Molars From Bitewing Radiographs.
    Dabawala S; Chacko V; Suprabha BS; Rao A; Natarajan S; Ongole R
    Pediatr Dent; 2015; 37(4):361-5. PubMed ID: 26314604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An investigation into the measurement of the working length of immature incisor teeth requiring endodontic treatment in children.
    Baggett FJ; Mackie IC; Worthington HV
    Br Dent J; 1996 Aug; 181(3):96-8. PubMed ID: 8810108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of digital radiography and apex locator with the conventional method in root length determination of primary teeth.
    Neena IE; Ananthraj A; Praveen P; Karthik V; Rani P
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2011; 29(4):300-4. PubMed ID: 22016313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficacy of several digital radiographic imaging systems for laboratory determination of endodontic file length.
    Oliveira ML; Ambrosano GM; Almeida SM; Haiter-Neto F; Tosoni GM
    Int Endod J; 2011 May; 44(5):469-73. PubMed ID: 21276021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of a digital measurement tool to estimate working length in endodontics.
    Lamus F; Katz JO; Glaros AG
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2001 Feb; 2(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 12167941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical evaluation of the accuracy of conventional radiography and apex locators in primary teeth.
    Patiño-Marín N; Zavala-Alonso NV; Martínez-Castañón GA; Sánchez-Benavides N; Villanueva-Gordillo M; Loyola-Rodríguez JP; Medina-Solís CE
    Pediatr Dent; 2011; 33(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 21406143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of a digital radiography to estimate working length.
    Almenar García A; Forner Navarro L; Ubet Castelló V; Miñana Laliga R
    J Endod; 1997 Jun; 23(6):363-5. PubMed ID: 9580242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gray scale inversion in digital image for measurement of tooth length.
    Oliveira ML; Vieira ML; Cruz AD; Bóscolo FN; DE Almeida SM
    Braz Dent J; 2012; 23(6):703-6. PubMed ID: 23338264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Direct digital radiography versus conventional radiography for estimation of canal length in curved canals.
    Burger CL; Mork TO; Hutter JW; Nicoll B
    J Endod; 1999 Apr; 25(4):260-3. PubMed ID: 10425952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ex vivo evaluation of the accuracy of two electronic apex locators during root canal length determination in primary teeth.
    Leonardo MR; Silva LA; Nelson-Filho P; Silva RA; Raffaini MS
    Int Endod J; 2008 Apr; 41(4):317-21. PubMed ID: 18217990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ex vivo accuracy of an apex locator using digital signal processing in primary teeth.
    Leonardo MR; da Silva LA; Nelson-Filho P; da Silva RA; Lucisano MP
    Pediatr Dent; 2009; 31(4):320-2. PubMed ID: 19722441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.