1783 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18254740)
21. Submerged or non-submerged healing of endosseous implants to be used in the rehabilitation of partially dentate patients.
Cecchinato D; Olsson C; Lindhe J
J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Apr; 31(4):299-308. PubMed ID: 15016259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Clinical experiences with laser-welded titanium frameworks supported by implants in the edentulous mandible: a 10-year follow-up study.
Ortorp A; Jemt T
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(4):198-209. PubMed ID: 17100745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A comparative clinical study of three different endosseous implants in edentulous mandibles.
Røynesdal AK; Ambjørnsen E; Støvne S; Haanaes HR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(4):500-5. PubMed ID: 9714956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. On the role of number of fixtures, surgical technique and timing of loading.
Eliasson A
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2008; (197):3-95. PubMed ID: 18652085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Histologic evaluation of bone response to oxidized and turned titanium micro-implants in human jawbone.
Ivanoff CJ; Widmark G; Johansson C; Wennerberg A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):341-8. PubMed ID: 12814308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Five-year clinical results of immediately loaded dental implants using mandibular overdentures.
Alfadda SA; Attard NJ; David LA
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 19639074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Early functional loading at 5 days for Brånemark implants placed into edentulous mandibles: a prospective, open-ended, longitudinal study.
Becker W; Becker BE; Huffstetlert S
J Periodontol; 2003 May; 74(5):695-702. PubMed ID: 12816303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Outcomes of placing short dental implants in the posterior mandible: a retrospective study of 124 cases.
Grant BT; Pancko FX; Kraut RA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):713-7. PubMed ID: 19304026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Implants and sinus-inlay graft in a 1-stage procedure in severely atrophied maxillae: prosthodontic aspects in a 3-year follow-up study.
Smedberg JI; Johansson P; Ekenbäck D; Wannfors D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(5):668-74. PubMed ID: 11669249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Immediate functional loading of TiOblast dental implants in full-arch edentulous maxillae: a 3-year prospective study.
Collaert B; De Bruyn H
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Dec; 19(12):1254-60. PubMed ID: 19040440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Retrospective study on immediate functional loading of edentulous maxillas and mandibles with 690 implants, up to 71 months of follow-up.
Li W; Chow J; Hui E; Lee PK; Chow R
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Dec; 67(12):2653-62. PubMed ID: 19925987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Early functional loading of conical Brånemark implants in the edentulous mandible: a 12-month follow-up clinical report.
Kronström M; Widbom T; Löfquist LE; Henningson C; Widbom C; Lundberg T
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):335-40. PubMed ID: 12690343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Outcome of oral implant treatment in partially edentulous jaws followed 20 years in clinical function.
Lekholm U; Gröndahl K; Jemt T
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(4):178-86. PubMed ID: 17100743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Immediate functional loading of Brånemark system implants in edentulous mandibles: clinical report of the results of developmental and simplified protocols.
Wolfinger GJ; Balshi TJ; Rangert B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(2):250-7. PubMed ID: 12705304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Stability and marginal bone level measurements of unsplinted implants used for mandibular overdentures: a 1-year randomized prospective clinical study comparing early and conventional loading protocols.
Turkyilmaz I; Sennerby L; Tumer C; Yenigul M; Avci M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):501-5. PubMed ID: 16958688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. New approach for immediate prosthetic rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible with three implants: a retrospective study.
Hatano N; Yamaguchi M; Yaita T; Ishibashi T; Sennerby L
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Nov; 22(11):1265-9. PubMed ID: 21457348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Clinical and radiologic evaluation of 2-stage IMZ implants placed in a single-stage procedure: 2-year results of a prospective comparative study.
Heydenrijk K; Raghoebar GM; Meijer HJ; Stegenga B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):424-32. PubMed ID: 12814319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A comparative clinical investigation of 2 early loaded ITI dental implants supporting an overdenture in the mandible.
Røynesdal AK; Amundrud B; Hannaes HR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(2):246-51. PubMed ID: 11324212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Clinical evaluation of short, machined-surface implants followed for 12 to 92 months.
Tawil G; Younan R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(6):894-901. PubMed ID: 14696666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Dental implants placed in expanded narrow edentulous ridges with the Extension Crest device. A 1-3-year multicenter follow-up study.
Chiapasco M; Ferrini F; Casentini P; Accardi S; Zaniboni M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Jun; 17(3):265-72. PubMed ID: 16672021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
