159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18255042)
1. Methodological individualism in experimental games: not so easily dismissed.
Krueger JI
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jun; 128(2):398-401; discussion 409-12. PubMed ID: 18255042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Collective rationality: the integrative model explains it (as) well.
Van Lange PA
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jun; 128(2):405-8; discussion 409-12. PubMed ID: 18316061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Collective rationality in interactive decisions: evidence for team reasoning.
Colman AM; Pulford BD; Rose J
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jun; 128(2):387-97. PubMed ID: 17868630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Team reasoning and collective rationality: piercing the veil of obviousness.
Colman AM; Pulford BD; Rose J
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jun; 128(2):409-12. PubMed ID: 18486930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nash equilibrium, team reasoning and cognitive hierarchy theory.
Sugden R
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jun; 128(2):402-4; discussion 409-12. PubMed ID: 18242570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perceptions of self and other in the prisoner's dilemma: outcome bias and evidential reasoning.
Krueger JI; Acevedo M
Am J Psychol; 2007; 120(4):593-618. PubMed ID: 18277518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Team reasoning: Solving the puzzle of coordination.
Colman AM; Gold N
Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Oct; 25(5):1770-1783. PubMed ID: 29101730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Game relativity: how context influences strategic decision making.
Vlaev I; Chater N
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):131-49. PubMed ID: 16478346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perceptions of morality and competence in (non)interdependent games.
Krueger JI; DiDonato TE
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 May; 134(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 20117759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Friend or foe: subjective expected relative similarity as a determinant of cooperation.
Fischer I
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Aug; 138(3):341-50. PubMed ID: 19653794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perspective-taking and depth of theory-of-mind reasoning in sequential-move games.
Zhang J; Hedden T; Chia A
Cogn Sci; 2012 Apr; 36(3):560-73. PubMed ID: 22436023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Social diversity promotes the emergence of cooperation in public goods games.
Santos FC; Santos MD; Pacheco JM
Nature; 2008 Jul; 454(7201):213-6. PubMed ID: 18615084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. When does "economic man" dominate social behavior?
Camerer CF; Fehr E
Science; 2006 Jan; 311(5757):47-52. PubMed ID: 16400140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Decision makers conceive of their choices as interventions.
Hagmayer Y; Sloman SA
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Feb; 138(1):22-38. PubMed ID: 19203168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cooperation, psychological game theory, and limitations of rationality in social interaction.
Colman AM
Behav Brain Sci; 2003 Apr; 26(2):139-53; discussion 153-98. PubMed ID: 14621510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Collective preferences in strategic decisions.
Rose J; Colman AM
Psychol Rep; 2007 Dec; 101(3 Pt 1):803-15. PubMed ID: 18232437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The neurobiology of social decision-making.
Rilling JK; King-Casas B; Sanfey AG
Curr Opin Neurobiol; 2008 Apr; 18(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 18639633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A simple scaling of the effectiveness of supporting mutual cooperation in donor-recipient games by various reciprocity mechanisms.
Tanimoto J
Biosystems; 2009 Apr; 96(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 19059458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Natural selection and social preferences.
Weibull JW; Salomonsson M
J Theor Biol; 2006 Mar; 239(1):79-92. PubMed ID: 16174522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Co-action equilibrium fails to predict choices in mixed-strategy settings.
Berger U
Sci Rep; 2018 Jan; 8(1):751. PubMed ID: 29335440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
