175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18255127)
1. An evaluation of cervical cancer in women age sixty and over.
Fox KV; Shah CA; Swisher EM; Garcia RL; Mandel LS; Gray HJ; Swensen RE; Goff BA
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Apr; 109(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 18255127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prognostic factors affecting the outcome of early cervical cancer treated with radical hysterectomy and post-operative adjuvant therapy.
Liu MT; Hsu JC; Liu WS; Wang AY; Huang WT; Chang TH; Pi CP; Huang CY; Huang CC; Chou PH; Chen TH
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2008 Mar; 17(2):174-81. PubMed ID: 18302655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cervical cancer: women aged 35 and younger compared to women aged 36 and older.
Clark MA; Naahas W; Markert RJ; Dodson MG
Am J Clin Oncol; 1991 Aug; 14(4):352-6. PubMed ID: 1862767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden.
Andrae B; Kemetli L; Sparén P; Silfverdal L; Strander B; Ryd W; Dillner J; Törnberg S
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(9):622-9. PubMed ID: 18445828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Conservative surgical management of small-volume stage IB1 cervical cancer.
Naik R; Cross P; Nayar A; Mayadevi S; Lopes A; Godfrey K; Hatem H
BJOG; 2007 Aug; 114(8):958-63. PubMed ID: 17578471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of cervical cancer screening program at a rural community of South Africa.
Hoque M; Hoque E; Kader SB
East Afr J Public Health; 2008 Aug; 5(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 19024420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Papanicolaou smear history of patients developing cervical cancer: an assessment of screening protocols.
Bearman DM; MacMillan JP; Creasman WT
Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Feb; 69(2):151-5. PubMed ID: 3808501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of an antepartum Pap smear on the coverage of a cervical cancer screening programme: a population-based prospective study.
Nygård M; Daltveit AK; Thoresen SO; Nygård JF
BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Jan; 7():10. PubMed ID: 17244348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differences in screening history, tumour characteristics and survival between women with screen-detected versus not screen-detected cervical cancer in the east of The Netherlands, 1992-2001.
van der Aa MA; Schutter EM; Looijen-Salamon M; Martens JE; Siesling S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Aug; 139(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 18093720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cervical cancer screening among elderly urban women in a primary care setting.
Wong QC; Collins R; Kalkstein K; Roth A; Gintautas J
Proc West Pharmacol Soc; 2005; 48():154-6. PubMed ID: 16416686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Incidence of subsequent abnormal cytology in cervical cancer patients completing five-years of post treatment surveillance without evidence of recurrence.
Orr JM; Barnett JC; Leath CA
Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Sep; 122(3):501-4. PubMed ID: 21714992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pathways to diagnosis of cervical cancer: screening history, delay in follow up, and smear reading.
Priest P; Sadler L; Peters J; Crengle S; Bethwaite P; Medley G; Jackson R
BJOG; 2007 Apr; 114(4):398-407. PubMed ID: 17166215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sentinel Pap smears in 261 invasive cervical cancer patients in Italy.
Igidbashian S; Maggioni A; Casadio C; Boveri S; Cristoforoni P; Sideri M
Vaccine; 2009 May; 27 Suppl 1():A34-8. PubMed ID: 19480959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cervical cancer screening in medically underserved California Latina and non-Latina women: effect of age and regularity of Pap testing.
Howell LP; Gurusinghe S; Tabnak F; Sciortino S
Cancer Detect Prev; 2009; 32(5-6):372-9. PubMed ID: 19264426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The cervical smear pattern in patients with chronic pelvic inflammatory disease.
Abdul MA; Shittu SO; Randawa JA; Shehu MS
Niger J Clin Pract; 2009 Sep; 12(3):289-93. PubMed ID: 19803028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The treatment of early stage cervical cancer: an assessment of pre-operative factors.
Buekers TE; Kao MS; Phillips NJ; Xynos FP
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Mar; 104(3):665-9. PubMed ID: 17112568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radical vaginal trachelectomy vs. radical hysterectomy for small early stage cervical cancer: a matched case-control study.
Beiner ME; Hauspy J; Rosen B; Murphy J; Laframboise S; Nofech-Mozes S; Ismiil N; Rasty G; Khalifa MA; Covens A
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Aug; 110(2):168-71. PubMed ID: 18539313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Invasive cervical cancer: a failure of screening.
Spayne J; Ackerman I; Milosevic M; Seidenfeld A; Covens A; Paszat L
Eur J Public Health; 2008 Apr; 18(2):162-5. PubMed ID: 17483491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is cytologic screening an effective surveillance method for detection of vaginal recurrence of uterine cancer?
Cooper AL; Dornfeld-Finke JM; Banks HW; Davey DD; Modesitt SC
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jan; 107(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 16394042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
