These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18256041)

  • 1. Linear mixed models for longitudinal shape data with applications to facial modeling.
    Barry SJ; Bowman AW
    Biostatistics; 2008 Jul; 9(3):555-65. PubMed ID: 18256041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Three-dimensional geometric morphometrics applied to the study of children with cleft lip and/or palate from the North East of England.
    Bugaighis I; O'Higgins P; Tiddeman B; Mattick C; Ben Ali O; Hobson R
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Oct; 32(5):514-21. PubMed ID: 20097701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-dimensional analysis of facial symmetry in cleft lip and palate patients using optical surface data.
    Stauber I; Vairaktaris E; Holst A; Schuster M; Hirschfelder U; Neukam FW; Nkenke E
    J Orofac Orthop; 2008 Jul; 69(4):268-82. PubMed ID: 18797831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three-dimensional facial morphology following surgical repair of unilateral cleft lip and palate in patients after nasoalveolar molding.
    Singh GD; Levy-Bercowski D; Yáñez MA; Santiago PE
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2007 Aug; 10(3):161-6. PubMed ID: 17651132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pairwise fitting of mixed models for the joint modeling of multivariate longitudinal profiles.
    Fieuws S; Verbeke G
    Biometrics; 2006 Jun; 62(2):424-31. PubMed ID: 16918906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three-dimensional evaluation of facial asymmetry in cleft lip and palate.
    Ras F; Habets LL; van Ginkel FC; Prahl-Andersen B
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1994 Mar; 31(2):116-21. PubMed ID: 8186217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digital surface photogrammetry for anthropometric analysis of the cleft infant face.
    Krimmel M; Kluba S; Bacher M; Dietz K; Reinert S
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2006 May; 43(3):350-5. PubMed ID: 16681408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An unusual bilateral oblique facial cleft in a newborn.
    Olasoji HO; Tahir C; Isa A
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2005 Jul; 69(7):999-1001. PubMed ID: 15911022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stereo-assisted landmark detection for the analysis of changes in 3-D facial shape.
    Naftel AJ; Trenouth MJ
    Med Inform Internet Med; 2004 Jun; 29(2):137-55. PubMed ID: 15370994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Face shape of unaffected parents with cleft affected offspring: combining three-dimensional surface imaging and geometric morphometrics.
    Weinberg SM; Naidoo SD; Bardi KM; Brandon CA; Neiswanger K; Resick JM; Martin RA; Marazita ML
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2009 Nov; 12(4):271-81. PubMed ID: 19840279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measuring progressive soft tissue change with nasoalveolar molding using a three-dimensional system.
    Simanca E; Morris D; Zhao L; Reisberg D; Viana G
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Sep; 22(5):1622-5. PubMed ID: 21959400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative morphometrics of embryonic facial morphogenesis: implications for cleft-lip etiology.
    Young NM; Wat S; Diewert VM; Browder LW; Hallgrímsson B
    Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2007 Jan; 290(1):123-39. PubMed ID: 17441205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantitative 3D soft tissue analysis of symmetry prior to and after unilateral cleft lip repair compared with non-cleft persons (performed in Cambodia).
    Schwenzer-Zimmerer K; Chaitidis D; Berg-Boerner I; Krol Z; Kovacs L; Schwenzer NF; Zimmerer S; Holberg C; Zeilhofer HF
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2008 Dec; 36(8):431-8. PubMed ID: 18701312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Smooth random effects distribution in a linear mixed model.
    Ghidey W; Lesaffre E; Eilers P
    Biometrics; 2004 Dec; 60(4):945-53. PubMed ID: 15606415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Extended information criterion (EIC) approach for linear mixed effects models under restricted maximum likelihood (REML) estimation.
    Yafune A; Funatogawa T; Ishiguro M
    Stat Med; 2005 Nov; 24(22):3417-29. PubMed ID: 16237658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Craniofacial landmarks in young children: how reliable are measurements based on 3-dimensional imaging?
    Metzler P; Bruegger LS; Kruse Gujer AL; Matthews F; Zemann W; Graetz KW; Luebbers HT
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 23(6):1790-5. PubMed ID: 23147340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A high-dimensional joint model for longitudinal outcomes of different nature.
    Faes C; Aerts M; Molenberghs G; Geys H; Teuns G; Bijnens L
    Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(22):4408-27. PubMed ID: 18551509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimation and prediction in linear mixed models with skew-normal random effects for longitudinal data.
    Lin TI; Lee JC
    Stat Med; 2008 Apr; 27(9):1490-507. PubMed ID: 17708515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Two-stage functional mixed models for evaluating the effect of longitudinal covariate profiles on a scalar outcome.
    Zhang D; Lin X; Sowers M
    Biometrics; 2007 Jun; 63(2):351-62. PubMed ID: 17688488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Simple fitting of subject-specific curves for longitudinal data.
    Durbán M; Harezlak J; Wand MP; Carroll RJ
    Stat Med; 2005 Apr; 24(8):1153-67. PubMed ID: 15568201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.