BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18256099)

  • 1. Impaction grafting with a bone-graft substitute in a sheep model of revision hip replacement.
    Coathup M; Smith N; Kingsley C; Buckland T; Dattani R; Ascroft GP; Blunn G
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Feb; 90(2):246-53. PubMed ID: 18256099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impaction bone grafting with hydroxyapatite: increased femoral component stability in experiments using Sawbones.
    Fujishiro T; Nishikawa T; Niikura T; Takikawa S; Nishiyama T; Mizuno K; Yoshiya S; Kurosaka M
    Acta Orthop; 2005 Aug; 76(4):550-4. PubMed ID: 16195073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of mesenchymal stem cells to enhance bone formation around revision hip replacements.
    Korda M; Blunn G; Goodship A; Hua J
    J Orthop Res; 2008 Jun; 26(6):880-5. PubMed ID: 18271017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A preclinical study of stem subsidence and graft incorporation after femoral impaction grafting using porous hydroxyapatite as a bone graft extender.
    Howie DW; McGee MA; Callary SA; Carbone A; Stamenkov RB; Bruce WJ; Findlay DM
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Oct; 26(7):1050-6. PubMed ID: 21802252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A hydroxyapatite graft substitute reduces subsidence in a femoral impaction grafting model.
    Munro NA; Downing MR; Meakin JR; Lee AJ; Ashcroft GP
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Feb; 455():246-52. PubMed ID: 16967033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Histological and biomechanical study of impacted cancellous allografts with cement in the femur: a canine model.
    Omoto O; Yasunaga Y; Adachi N; Deie M; Ochi M
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Dec; 128(12):1357-64. PubMed ID: 18758792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The use of OP-1 in femoral impaction grafting in a sheep model.
    McGee MA; Findlay DM; Howie DW; Carbone A; Ward P; Stamenkov R; Page TT; Bruce WJ; Wildenauer CI; Toth C
    J Orthop Res; 2004 Sep; 22(5):1008-15. PubMed ID: 15304273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impaction grafting of the acetabulum with a mixture of frozen, ground irradiated bone graft and porous synthetic bone substitute (Apapore 60).
    McNamara I; Deshpande S; Porteous M
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 May; 92(5):617-23. PubMed ID: 20435995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Structural characteristics of impaction allografting for revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Robinson MC; Fernlund G; Dominic Meek RM; Masri BA; Duncan CP; Oxland TR
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Oct; 20(8):853-5. PubMed ID: 16023774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A laboratory simulation for morselized bone graft fusion: apparent modulus under operatively based femoral impaction kinetics.
    Heiner AD; Callaghan JJ; Brown TD
    J Biomech; 2005 Apr; 38(4):811-8. PubMed ID: 15713302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biological and mechanical changes of the bone graft-cement interface after impaction allografting.
    Frei H; O'Connell J; Masri BA; Duncan CP; Oxland TR
    J Orthop Res; 2005 Nov; 23(6):1271-9. PubMed ID: 15964167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Management of the bone defects in revision total hip arthroplasty].
    Wang Y; Zhou YG
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Oct; 43(20):1309-12. PubMed ID: 16271241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adjuvant therapies of bone graft around non-cemented experimental orthopedic implants stereological methods and experiments in dogs.
    Baas J
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2008 Aug; 79(330):1-43. PubMed ID: 19065776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biological effects of calcium sulfate as a bone graft substitute in ovine metaphyseal defects.
    Peters CL; Hines JL; Bachus KN; Craig MA; Bloebaum RD
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2006 Mar; 76(3):456-62. PubMed ID: 16278868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stem micromotion after femoral impaction grafting using irradiated allograft bone: a time zero in vitro study.
    Costi JJ; Edmonds-Wilson RH; Howie DW; Stamenkov R; Field JR; Stanley RM; Hearn TC; Callary SA; McGee MA
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2013 Aug; 28(7):770-6. PubMed ID: 23896432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Vibration-assisted bone-graft compaction in impaction bone grafting of the femur.
    Bolland BJ; New AM; Madabhushi SP; Oreffo RO; Dunlop DG
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 May; 89(5):686-92. PubMed ID: 17540758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Cemented versus cementless revision femoral stems using morselized allograft--a prospective, randomized study with 5 years follow-up].
    Nesse E; Nielsen EW; Bastian D
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(6):678-83. PubMed ID: 14679434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reconstruction of femoral defects in revision hip surgery: risk of fracture and stem migration after impaction bone grafting.
    Barker R; Takahashi T; Toms A; Gregson P; Kuiper JH
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Jun; 88(6):832-6. PubMed ID: 16720783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Subsidence in impaction grafting: the effect of adding a ceramic bone graft extender to bone.
    Blom AW; Grimm B; Miles AW; Cunningham JL; Learmonth ID
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2002; 216(4):265-70. PubMed ID: 12206523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Reconstruction of femoral defects with particulate bone grafting in revision total hip arthroplasty].
    Shen Y; Wang W; Song D
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2009 Nov; 34(11):1148-50. PubMed ID: 19952407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.