BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18257372)

  • 1. [Comparative study of surgical efficacy in open versus laparoscopic prostatectomy: virtual prostate reconstruction and periprostatic tissue quantification].
    Diaz JI; Corica A; McKenzie R; Schellhammer PF
    Actas Urol Esp; 2007 Oct; 31(9):1045-55. PubMed ID: 18257372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computer modeling technology to assess extracapsular tissue coverage of whole mount sections after retropubic and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Schellhammer PF; Diaz JI; Fabrizio MD; Davis JW; Given RW; Main B; Chaganty NR; Hussein R; McKenzie R
    J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1301-5. PubMed ID: 17698100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
    Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
    J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The addition of robotic surgery to an established laparoscopic radical prostatectomy program: effect on positive surgical margins.
    Trabulsi EJ; Linden RA; Gomella LG; McGinnis DE; Strup SE; Lallas CD
    Can J Urol; 2008 Apr; 15(2):3994-9. PubMed ID: 18405448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Augmented-reality robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using hyper-accuracy three-dimensional reconstruction (HA3D™) technology: a radiological and pathological study.
    Porpiglia F; Checcucci E; Amparore D; Autorino R; Piana A; Bellin A; Piazzolla P; Massa F; Bollito E; Gned D; De Pascale A; Fiori C
    BJU Int; 2019 May; 123(5):834-845. PubMed ID: 30246936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: early outcomes from a randomised controlled phase 3 study.
    Yaxley JW; Coughlin GD; Chambers SK; Occhipinti S; Samaratunga H; Zajdlewicz L; Dunglison N; Carter R; Williams S; Payton DJ; Perry-Keene J; Lavin MF; Gardiner RA
    Lancet; 2016 Sep; 388(10049):1057-1066. PubMed ID: 27474375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A centralized comparison of radical perineal and retropubic prostatectomy specimens: is there a difference according to the surgical approach?
    Korman HJ; Leu PB; Huang RR; Goldstein NS
    J Urol; 2002 Sep; 168(3):991-4. PubMed ID: 12187206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Location of positive surgical margins after retropubic, perineal, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for organ-confined prostate cancer.
    Salomon L; Anastasiadis AG; Levrel O; Katz R; Saint F; de la Taille A; Cicco A; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Chopin D; Abbou CC
    Urology; 2003 Feb; 61(2):386-90. PubMed ID: 12597953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intraoperative frozen section of the prostate decreases positive margin rate while ensuring nerve sparing procedure during radical prostatectomy.
    von Bodman C; Brock M; Roghmann F; Byers A; Löppenberg B; Braun K; Pastor J; Sommerer F; Noldus J; Palisaar RJ
    J Urol; 2013 Aug; 190(2):515-20. PubMed ID: 23415965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Localization of positive surgical margins after retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy].
    Salomon L; Levrel O; de la Taille A; Hoznek A; Chopin D; Abbou CC
    Prog Urol; 2002 Sep; 12(4):628-34. PubMed ID: 12463122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Characteristics of positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, open retropubic radical prostatectomy, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a comparative histopathologic study from a single academic center.
    Albadine R; Hyndman ME; Chaux A; Jeong JY; Saab S; Tavora F; Epstein JI; Gonzalgo ML; Pavlovich CP; Netto GJ
    Hum Pathol; 2012 Feb; 43(2):254-60. PubMed ID: 21820147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: comparison of short-term biochemical recurrence-free survival.
    Barocas DA; Salem S; Kordan Y; Herrell SD; Chang SS; Clark PE; Davis R; Baumgartner R; Phillips S; Cookson MS; Smith JA
    J Urol; 2010 Mar; 183(3):990-6. PubMed ID: 20083261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: 24-month outcomes from a randomised controlled study.
    Coughlin GD; Yaxley JW; Chambers SK; Occhipinti S; Samaratunga H; Zajdlewicz L; Teloken P; Dunglison N; Williams S; Lavin MF; Gardiner RA
    Lancet Oncol; 2018 Aug; 19(8):1051-1060. PubMed ID: 30017351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tumor volume in radical prostatectomy specimens assessed by digital image analysis software correlates with other prognostic factors.
    Sherwin JC; Mirmilstein G; Pedersen J; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton D; Mills J
    J Urol; 2010 May; 183(5):1808-14. PubMed ID: 20303103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Obese men undergoing radical prostatectomy: Is robotic or retropubic better to limit positive surgical margins? Results from SEARCH.
    Nik-Ahd F; Howard LE; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Klaassen Z; Cooperberg MR; Amling CL; Kane CJ; Freedland SJ
    Int J Urol; 2020 Oct; 27(10):851-857. PubMed ID: 32681540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robot-assisted or pure laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: what is the optimal procedure for the surgical margins? A single center experience.
    Koutlidis N; Mourey E; Champigneulle J; Mangin P; Cormier L
    Int J Urol; 2012 Dec; 19(12):1076-81. PubMed ID: 22860572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outcome and complications of radical prostatectomy in patients with PSA <10 ng/ml: comparison between the retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic approach.
    Salomon L; Levrel O; Anastasiadis AG; Saint F; de La Taille A; Cicco A; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Chopin D; Abbou CC
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2002; 5(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 12627213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical significance of benign glands at surgical margins in robotic radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Kohl SK; Balaji KC; Smith LM; Wilson NP; Johansson SL; Sterrett SP; Abrahams NA
    Urology; 2007 Jun; 69(6):1112-6. PubMed ID: 17572197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of apical soft tissue margins during radical retropubic prostatectomy.
    Shah O; Melamed J; Lepor H
    J Urol; 2001 Jun; 165(6 Pt 1):1943-8; discussion 1948-9. PubMed ID: 11371886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Erectile Function and Oncologic Outcomes Following Open Retropubic and Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Results from the LAParoscopic Prostatectomy Robot Open Trial.
    Sooriakumaran P; Pini G; Nyberg T; Derogar M; Carlsson S; Stranne J; Bjartell A; Hugosson J; Steineck G; Wiklund PN
    Eur Urol; 2018 Apr; 73(4):618-627. PubMed ID: 28882327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.