216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18257448)
1. Update: Standards improvement initiative.
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
Jt Comm Perspect; 2007 Dec; 27(12):7. PubMed ID: 18257448
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Joint Commission launches Standards Improvement Initiative.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2006 Oct; 26(10):1. PubMed ID: 17139923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. UPDATE: standards improvement initiative.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2007 Apr; 27(4):1, 3. PubMed ID: 17472125
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Approved: 2008 thresholds for conditional accreditation and preliminary denial of accreditation.
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
Jt Comm Perspect; 2007 Dec; 27(12):4, 11. PubMed ID: 18257445
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Developing RM standards.
Heidemann EG
Dimens Health Serv; 1990 Sep; 67(6):5-8, 16, 34. PubMed ID: 2265746
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Approved: 2007 Accreditation Decision Rules for all programs.
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
Jt Comm Perspect; 2006 Aug; 26(8):1, 3-6. PubMed ID: 16937839
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Upcoming changes to standards.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2006 Feb; 26(2):5, 9. PubMed ID: 16933546
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Clarification: details of elimination of four-month track record requirements decision.
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
Jt Comm Perspect; 2008 Jan; 28(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 18286919
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Update: Standards Improvement Initiative.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2008 Mar; 28(3):9. PubMed ID: 18411897
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. UPDATE: revised scoring for all 2009 accreditation manuals.
Joint Commission
Jt Comm Perspect; 2009 May; 29(5):3. PubMed ID: 19845205
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Standards review project hits its mark.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Jan; 24(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 14746091
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Update: additional scoring changes for all 2009 accreditation manuals.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2009 Jun; 29(6):8-9. PubMed ID: 19579473
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. GAO report affirms integrity of Joint Commission accreditation process.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2007 Feb; 27(2):3. PubMed ID: 17370750
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. How SII may affect your PPR.
Joint Commission
Jt Comm Perspect; 2008 Oct; 28(10):1, 3. PubMed ID: 19133597
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Do all health care institutions get a fair chance during the accreditation procedure?].
Daucourt V; Domecq S; Michel P
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2006 Oct; 54(5):463-8. PubMed ID: 17149167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. EP scoring category changes for disease-specific care.
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
Jt Comm Perspect; 2006 Aug; 26(8):7-8. PubMed ID: 16937840
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Ethics and quality improvement. Quality care and ethical principles cannot be separated when considering quality improvement activities.
Nelson WA; Gardent PB
Healthc Exec; 2008; 23(4):40-1. PubMed ID: 18724589
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Revised standards for Australian health care facilities.
Rotem W
Aust Clin Rev; 1986 Sep; 6(22):155-7. PubMed ID: 3767720
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. NCQA's new online survey tries to tame the paper tiger.
Berberabe T
Manag Care; 2004 Jul; 13(7):36-7. PubMed ID: 15347158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of accreditation in an era of market-driven accountability.
Pawlson LG; Torda P; Roski J; O'Kane ME
Am J Manag Care; 2005 May; 11(5):290-3. PubMed ID: 15898217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
