131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1825900)
1. The risks of death and of severe nonfatal reactions with high- vs low-osmolality contrast media: a meta-analysis.
Caro JJ; Trindade E; McGregor M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Apr; 156(4):825-32. PubMed ID: 1825900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The safety and cost-effectiveness of low osmolar contrast media. Can economic analysis determine the real worth of a new technology?
Henry DA; Evans DB; Robertson J
Med J Aust; 1991 Jun; 154(11):766-72. PubMed ID: 1828529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The cost-effectiveness of replacing high-osmolality with low-osmolality contrast media.
Caro JJ; Trindade E; McGregor M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Oct; 159(4):869-74. PubMed ID: 1529856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Safety and cost effectiveness of high-osmolality as compared with low-osmolality contrast material in patients undergoing cardiac angiography.
Steinberg EP; Moore RD; Powe NR; Gopalan R; Davidoff AJ; Litt M; Graziano S; Brinker JA
N Engl J Med; 1992 Feb; 326(7):425-30. PubMed ID: 1732769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Decision analysis to assess cost-effectiveness of low-osmolality contrast medium for intravenous urography.
Calvo MV; Pilar del Val M; Mar Alvarez M; Domínguez-Gil A
Am J Hosp Pharm; 1992 Mar; 49(3):577-84. PubMed ID: 1598930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of intravascular low-osmolality contrast agents.
Swanson DP; Thrall JH; Shetty PC
Clin Pharm; 1986 Nov; 5(11):877-91. PubMed ID: 3780159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of nonionic, low-osmolality radiocontrast agents with ionic, high-osmolality agents during cardiac catheterization.
Barrett BJ; Parfrey PS; Vavasour HM; O'Dea F; Kent G; Stone E
N Engl J Med; 1992 Feb; 326(7):431-6. PubMed ID: 1732770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Selective use of low-osmolality contrast agents for i.v. urography and CT: safety and effect on cost.
Hunter TB; Dye J; Duval JF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Oct; 163(4):965-8. PubMed ID: 8092044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nonionic low-osmolality versus ionic high-osmolality contrast material for intravenous use in patients perceived to be at high risk: randomized trial.
Barrett BJ; Parfrey PS; McDonald JR; Hefferton DM; Reddy ER; McManamon PJ
Radiology; 1992 Apr; 183(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 1549654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multicity study of air pollution and mortality in Latin America (the ESCALA study).
Romieu I; Gouveia N; Cifuentes LA; de Leon AP; Junger W; Vera J; Strappa V; Hurtado-Díaz M; Miranda-Soberanis V; Rojas-Bracho L; Carbajal-Arroyo L; Tzintzun-Cervantes G;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 Oct; (171):5-86. PubMed ID: 23311234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nonfatal adverse reactions to iodinated contrast media: spontaneous reporting to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 1978-1994.
Spring DB; Bettmann MA; Barkan HE
Radiology; 1997 Aug; 204(2):325-32. PubMed ID: 9240515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiocontrast media allergic reactions and interventional pain practice--a review.
Newmark JL; Mehra A; Singla AK
Pain Physician; 2012; 15(5):E665-75. PubMed ID: 22996860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effectiveness of unenhanced MR imaging vs contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen or pelvis.
Lessler DS; Sullivan SD; Stergachis A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 8010246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Reactions to iodinated contrast media].
Porri F; Vervloet D
Allerg Immunol (Paris); 1994 Dec; 26(10):374-6, 379. PubMed ID: 7702729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intravenous contrast media: use and associated mortality.
Cashman JD; McCredie J; Henry DA
Med J Aust; 1991 Nov; 155(9):618-23. PubMed ID: 1943961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Low-osmolality versus high-osmolality contrast material.
Korn WT; Bettmann MA
Curr Opin Radiol; 1992 Apr; 4(2):9-15. PubMed ID: 1554592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Acute reactions to intravascular contrast media: types, risk factors, recognition, and specific treatment.
Bush WH; Swanson DP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Dec; 157(6):1153-61. PubMed ID: 1950858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adverse reactions to contrast media: factors that determine the cost of treatment.
Powe NR; Moore RD; Steinberg EP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Nov; 161(5):1089-95. PubMed ID: 8273616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Breakthrough adverse reactions to low-osmolar contrast media after steroid premedication.
Freed KS; Leder RA; Alexander C; DeLong DM; Kliewer MA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Jun; 176(6):1389-92. PubMed ID: 11373198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
