1303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18259077)
21. Vibroplasty in mixed and conductive hearing loss: comparison of different coupling methods.
Vyskocil E; Riss D; Honeder C; Arnoldner C; Hamzavi JS; Baumgartner WD; Flak S; Gstoettner W
Laryngoscope; 2014 Jun; 124(6):1436-43. PubMed ID: 24338550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Revision stapes surgery: the malleus to oval window wire-piston technique.
Kohan D; Sorin A
Laryngoscope; 2003 Sep; 113(9):1520-4. PubMed ID: 12972927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Cochlear implantation in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 and bilateral vestibular schwannoma.
Lustig LR; Yeagle J; Driscoll CL; Blevins N; Francis H; Niparko JK
Otol Neurotol; 2006 Jun; 27(4):512-8. PubMed ID: 16791043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Treatment of mixed hearing losses via implantation of a vibratory transducer on the round window.
Colletti V; Soli SD; Carner M; Colletti L
Int J Audiol; 2006 Oct; 45(10):600-8. PubMed ID: 17062502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Functional results of Vibrant Soundbridge middle ear implants in conductive and mixed hearing losses.
Bernardeschi D; Hoffman C; Benchaa T; Labassi S; Beliaeff M; Sterkers O; Grayeli AB
Audiol Neurootol; 2011; 16(6):381-7. PubMed ID: 21228566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Our auditory results using the Vibrant Soundbridge on the long process of the incus: 20 years of data.
Grégoire A; Van Damme JP; Gilain C; Bihin B; Garin P
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2018 Feb; 45(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 28285827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Long-term outcome of round window Vibrant SoundBridge implantation in extensive ossicular chain defects.
Colletti L; Mandalà M; Colletti V
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Jul; 149(1):134-41. PubMed ID: 23585147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [The Vibrant Soundbridge System: a new kind of hearing aid for sensorineural hearing loss. 1: Function and initial clinical experiences].
Lenarz T; Weber BP; Mack KF; Battmer RD; Gnadeberg D
Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 May; 77(5):247-55. PubMed ID: 9644671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Hearing results after stapedotomy: role of the prosthesis diameter.
Marchese MR; Cianfrone F; Passali GC; Paludetti G
Audiol Neurootol; 2007; 12(4):221-5. PubMed ID: 17389788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Mixed hearing loss in otosclerosis: indication for long-term follow-up.
Ramsay HA; Linthicum FH
Am J Otol; 1994 Jul; 15(4):536-9. PubMed ID: 8588610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Otologics fully implantable hearing system: Phase I trial 1-year results.
Jenkins HA; Atkins JS; Horlbeck D; Hoffer ME; Balough B; Alexiades G; Garvis W
Otol Neurotol; 2008 Jun; 29(4):534-41. PubMed ID: 18317397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Partial deafness treatment with the nucleus straight research array cochlear implant.
Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Matusiak M; Porowski M; Skarzynski PH; James CJ
Audiol Neurootol; 2012; 17(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 21846981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The middle ear bioelectronic microphone for a totally implantable cochlear hearing device for profound and total hearing loss.
Maniglia AJ; Abbass H; Azar T; Kane M; Amantia P; Garverick S; Ko WH; Frenz W; Falk T
Am J Otol; 1999 Sep; 20(5):602-11. PubMed ID: 10503582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Direct acoustic cochlear stimulation for therapy of severe to profound mixed hearing loss: Codacs™ Direct Acoustic Cochlear Implant System].
Lenarz T; Schwab B; Maier H; Kludt E
HNO; 2014 Jul; 62(7):481-9. PubMed ID: 25056645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Revision stapedectomy.
Langman AW; Lindeman RC
Laryngoscope; 1993 Sep; 103(9):954-8. PubMed ID: 8361314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Audiometric analyses confirm a cochlear component, disproportional to age, in stapedial otosclerosis.
Topsakal V; Fransen E; Schmerber S; Declau F; Yung M; Gordts F; Van Camp G; Van de Heyning P
Otol Neurotol; 2006 Sep; 27(6):781-7. PubMed ID: 16885785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Active middle ear implant compared with open-fit hearing aid in sloping high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
Boeheim K; Pok SM; Schloegel M; Filzmoser P
Otol Neurotol; 2010 Apr; 31(3):424-9. PubMed ID: 20042907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Application of active middle ear implants in patients with severe mixed hearing loss.
Verhaegen VJ; Mulder JJ; Cremers CW; Snik AF
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Apr; 33(3):297-301. PubMed ID: 22366752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A middle ear implant with a titanium canal wall prosthesis for a case of an open mastoid cavity.
Deveze A; Rameh C; Sanjuan M; Lavieille JP; Magnan J
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2010 Oct; 37(5):631-5. PubMed ID: 20167445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A prospective evaluation of the Essen titanium stapes prosthesis.
Dost P; Arweiler-Harbeck D; Jahnke K
Clin Otolaryngol; 2005 Feb; 30(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 15748184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
