BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

471 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18259164)

  • 1. FDA on transgenic animals--a dog's breakfast?
    Miller HI
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Feb; 26(2):159-60. PubMed ID: 18259164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Action needed to harmonize regulation of low-level presence of biotech traits.
    Krueger R; Le Buanec B
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Feb; 26(2):161-2. PubMed ID: 18259165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The WTO complaint--why now?
    Kinderlerer J
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Jul; 21(7):735-6. PubMed ID: 12833086
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. EU reflects European public opinion.
    Borch K; Lassen J; Jørgensen RB
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Sep; 21(9):976. PubMed ID: 12949553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. First salvo in transatlantic food fight is far from last word.
    Miller HI
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Jul; 21(7):737-8. PubMed ID: 12833087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Codex guidelines for GM foods include the analysis of unintended effects.
    Haslberger AG
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Jul; 21(7):739-41. PubMed ID: 12833088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. GM confusion in Brazil.
    Bonalume Neto R
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Nov; 21(11):1257-8. PubMed ID: 14595342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. US academia held accountable for GM products.
    Powell K
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Jul; 21(7):720-1. PubMed ID: 12833077
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. US animal biotech regulations "may not be adequate".
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Oct; 20(10):959. PubMed ID: 12355099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The science and politics of plant biotechnology--a personal perspective.
    Vasil IK
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Aug; 21(8):849-51. PubMed ID: 12894193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A framework for designing transgenic crops--science, safety and citizen's concerns.
    König A
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Nov; 21(11):1274-9. PubMed ID: 14595351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. EU reflects European public opinion.
    Barnes MH
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Sep; 21(9):975-6. PubMed ID: 12949552
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. GM labeling in China beset by problems.
    Jia H
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Aug; 21(8):835-6. PubMed ID: 12894183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Animal cloning and the FDA--the risk assessment paradigm under public scrutiny.
    Rudenko L; Matheson JC; Sundlof SF
    Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Jan; 25(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 17211392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Supervision of genetically modified foods by the international community].
    Wang R; Yang X
    Wei Sheng Yan Jiu; 2007 Mar; 36(2):245-8. PubMed ID: 17555112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. USDA scrutinizes GM organism regulations.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Mar; 22(3):254-5. PubMed ID: 14990936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Model pigs face messy path.
    Maxmen A
    Nature; 2012 Jun; 486(7404):453. PubMed ID: 22739291
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. NAS issues mixed message on unintended effects of GM food.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Sep; 22(9):1062. PubMed ID: 15340456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. EU to monitor for Chinese GM rice.
    Huggett B
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 May; 26(5):478. PubMed ID: 18464757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Safety assessment, detection and traceability, and societal aspects of genetically modified foods. European Network on Safety Assessment of Genetically Modified Food Crops (ENTRANSFOOD). Concluding remarks.
    Kuiper HA; König A; Kleter GA; Hammes WP; Knudsen I;
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2004 Jul; 42(7):1195-202. PubMed ID: 15123387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.