BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18259178)

  • 1. Assessment of risk of insect-resistant transgenic crops to nontarget arthropods.
    Romeis J; Bartsch D; Bigler F; Candolfi MP; Gielkens MM; Hartley SE; Hellmich RL; Huesing JE; Jepson PC; Layton R; Quemada H; Raybould A; Rose RI; Schiemann J; Sears MK; Shelton AM; Sweet J; Vaituzis Z; Wolt JD
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Feb; 26(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 18259178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nontarget effects of transgenic insecticidal crops: implications of source-sink population dynamics.
    Sisterson MS; Carrière Y; Dennehy TJ; Tabashnik BE
    Environ Entomol; 2007 Feb; 36(1):121-7. PubMed ID: 17349125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Deriving criteria to select arthropod species for laboratory tests to assess the ecological risks from cultivating arthropod-resistant genetically engineered crops.
    Romeis J; Raybould A; Bigler F; Candolfi MP; Hellmich RL; Huesing JE; Shelton AM
    Chemosphere; 2013 Jan; 90(3):901-9. PubMed ID: 23062830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recommendations for the design of laboratory studies on non-target arthropods for risk assessment of genetically engineered plants.
    Romeis J; Hellmich RL; Candolfi MP; Carstens K; De Schrijver A; Gatehouse AM; Herman RA; Huesing JE; McLean MA; Raybould A; Shelton AM; Waggoner A
    Transgenic Res; 2011 Feb; 20(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 20938806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing environmental risks of transgenic plants.
    Andow DA; Zwahlen C
    Ecol Lett; 2006 Feb; 9(2):196-214. PubMed ID: 16958885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recent developments and future prospects in insect pest control in transgenic crops.
    Christou P; Capell T; Kohli A; Gatehouse JA; Gatehouse AM
    Trends Plant Sci; 2006 Jun; 11(6):302-8. PubMed ID: 16690346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Are Bt crops safe?
    Mendelsohn M; Kough J; Vaituzis Z; Matthews K
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Sep; 21(9):1003-9. PubMed ID: 12949561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How to cope with insect resistance to Bt toxins?
    Bravo A; Soberón M
    Trends Biotechnol; 2008 Oct; 26(10):573-9. PubMed ID: 18706722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A tiered system for assessing the risk of genetically modified plants to non-target organisms.
    Garcia-Alonso M; Jacobs E; Raybould A; Nickson TE; Sowig P; Willekens H; Van der Kouwe P; Layton R; Amijee F; Fuentes AM; Tencalla F
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2006; 5(2):57-65. PubMed ID: 17328852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Insect-resistant transgenic plants in a multi-trophic context.
    Groot AT; Dicke M
    Plant J; 2002 Aug; 31(4):387-406. PubMed ID: 12182699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Insect resistance to Bt crops: evidence versus theory.
    Tabashnik BE; Gassmann AJ; Crowder DW; Carriére Y
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Feb; 26(2):199-202. PubMed ID: 18259177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Problem formulation and hypothesis testing for environmental risk assessments of genetically modified crops.
    Raybould A
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2006; 5(3):119-25. PubMed ID: 17445509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Conservation biology, genetically modified organisms, and the biosafety protocol.
    Hill R; Sendashonga C
    Conserv Biol; 2006 Dec; 20(6):1620-5. PubMed ID: 17181797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Representative taxa in field trials for environmental risk assessment of genetically modified maize.
    Albajes R; Lumbierres B; Pons X; Comas J
    Bull Entomol Res; 2013 Dec; 103(6):724-33. PubMed ID: 23987801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Derivation and interpretation of hazard quotients to assess ecological risks from the cultivation of insect-resistant transgenic crops.
    Raybould A; Caron-Lormier G; Bohan DA
    J Agric Food Chem; 2011 Jun; 59(11):5877-85. PubMed ID: 21247173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transgenic plants as vital components of integrated pest management.
    Kos M; van Loon JJ; Dicke M; Vet LE
    Trends Biotechnol; 2009 Nov; 27(11):621-7. PubMed ID: 19783315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gaps, inexperience, inconsistencies, and overlaps: crisis in the regulation of genetically modified plants and animals.
    Mandal GN
    William Mary Law Rev; 2004 Apr; 45(5):2167-259. PubMed ID: 16329219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reducing uncertainty in regulatory decision-making for transgenic crops: more ecological research or clearer environmental risk assessment?
    Raybould A
    GM Crops; 2010; 1(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 21912209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Potential side effects of insect-resistant transgenic plants on arthropod natural enemies.
    Schuler TH; Poppy GM; Kerry BR; Denholm I
    Trends Biotechnol; 1999 May; 17(5):210-6. PubMed ID: 10322447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.