These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18259205)

  • 1. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and noncontact tonometry in ocular hypertension and glaucoma.
    Erdurmus M; Totan Y; Hepsen IF; Yagci R
    Eye (Lond); 2009 Mar; 23(3):663-8. PubMed ID: 18259205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The relative effects of corneal thickness and age on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.
    Kotecha A; White ET; Shewry JM; Garway-Heath DF
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Dec; 89(12):1572-5. PubMed ID: 16299132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers.
    Kotecha A; White E; Schlottmann PG; Garway-Heath DF
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):730-7. PubMed ID: 20122737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes.
    Ceruti P; Morbio R; Marraffa M; Marchini G
    Eye (Lond); 2009 Feb; 23(2):262-9. PubMed ID: 18219335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of central corneal thickness and corneal curvature radius on the intraocular pressure as measured by different tonometers: noncontact and goldmann applanation tonometers.
    Harada Y; Hirose N; Kubota T; Tawara A
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Dec; 17(8):619-25. PubMed ID: 19092456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Varying effects of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with different tonometers.
    Ko YC; Liu CJ; Hsu WM
    Eye (Lond); 2005 Mar; 19(3):327-32. PubMed ID: 15258603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes.
    Hager A; Loge K; Schroeder B; Füllhas MO; Wiegand W
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Aug; 17(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 18703945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma practice.
    Halkiadakis I; Patsea E; Chatzimichali K; Skouriotis S; Chalkidou S; Amariotakis G; Papakonstadinou D; Theodossiadis G; Amariotakis A; Georgopoulos G
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 87(3):323-8. PubMed ID: 18631335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The relationship between diurnal variations in intraocular pressure measurements and central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis.
    Kotecha A; Crabb DP; Spratt A; Garway-Heath DF
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Sep; 50(9):4229-36. PubMed ID: 19407025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of goldmann applanation tonometer, noncontact tonometer, and TonoPen XL for intraocular pressure measurement in different types of glaucomatous, ocular hypertensive, and normal eyes.
    Kim NR; Kim CY; Kim H; Seong GJ; Lee ES
    Curr Eye Res; 2011 Apr; 36(4):295-300. PubMed ID: 21284505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dynamic contour tonometry in comparison to intracameral IOP measurements.
    Boehm AG; Weber A; Pillunat LE; Koch R; Spoerl E
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Jun; 49(6):2472-7. PubMed ID: 18316699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Agreement of rebound tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure with three types of applanation tonometers.
    Nakamura M; Darhad U; Tatsumi Y; Fujioka M; Kusuhara A; Maeda H; Negi A
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Aug; 142(2):332-4. PubMed ID: 16876523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in deep lamellar and penetrating keratoplasties.
    Ceruti P; Morbio R; Marraffa M; Marchini G
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 145(2):215-221. PubMed ID: 18222191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of corneal thickness on dynamic contour, rebound, and goldmann tonometry.
    Martinez-de-la-Casa JM; Garcia-Feijoo J; Vico E; Fernandez-Vidal A; Benitez del Castillo JM; Wasfi M; Garcia-Sanchez J
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Dec; 113(12):2156-62. PubMed ID: 16996599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical comparison of pascal dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in asymmetric open-angle glaucoma.
    Sullivan-Mee M; Halverson KD; Qualls C
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Dec; 16(8):694-9. PubMed ID: 18091457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements and assessment of intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility with the portable ICare rebound tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients.
    Salim S; Du H; Wan J
    J Glaucoma; 2013; 22(4):325-9. PubMed ID: 23542696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Kaufmann C; Bachmann LM; Thiel MA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Sep; 45(9):3118-21. PubMed ID: 15326129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical use of a new position-independent rebound tonometer.
    Jablonski KS; Rosentreter A; Gaki S; Lappas A; Dietlein TS
    J Glaucoma; 2013 Dec; 22(9):763-7. PubMed ID: 23172572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dynamic contour tonometry: handheld versus slit-lamp-mounted.
    Knecht PB; Bosch MM; Menke MN; Bachmann LM; Funk J; Kaufmann C
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Aug; 116(8):1450-4. PubMed ID: 19500848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of factors affecting the difference in intraocular pressure measurements between dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Wang J; Cayer MM; Descovich D; Kamdeu-Fansi A; Harasymowycz PJ; Li G; Lesk MR
    J Glaucoma; 2011 Oct; 20(8):482-7. PubMed ID: 21048515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.