154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18259784)
1. The diagnostic value of a treadmill test in predicting lumbar spinal stenosis.
Barz T; Melloh M; Staub L; Roeder C; Lange J; Smiszek FG; Theis JC; Merk HR
Eur Spine J; 2008 May; 17(5):686-90. PubMed ID: 18259784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Correlation of lateral stenosis in MRI with symptoms, walking capacity and EMG findings in patients with surgically confirmed lateral lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
Kuittinen P; Sipola P; Aalto TJ; Määttä S; Parviainen A; Saari T; Sinikallio S; Savolainen S; Turunen V; Kröger H; Airaksinen O; Leinonen V
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2014 Jul; 15():247. PubMed ID: 25051886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Gait analysis does not correlate with clinical and MR imaging parameters in patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis.
Zeifang F; Schiltenwolf M; Abel R; Moradi B
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2008 Jun; 9():89. PubMed ID: 18570636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the predictive value of myelography, computed tomography and MRI on the treadmill test in lumbar spinal stenosis.
Moon ES; Kim HS; Park JO; Shin DE; Ha JW; Shim DJ; Kwak YH; Lee KI
Yonsei Med J; 2005 Dec; 46(6):806-11. PubMed ID: 16385657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lumbar Canal Stenosis: A Prospective Clinicoradiologic Analysis.
Jain N; Acharya S; Adsul NM; Haritwal MK; Kumar M; Chahal RS; Kalra KL
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg; 2020 Sep; 81(5):387-391. PubMed ID: 32107754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical symptoms of lumbar spinal stenosis associated with morphological parameters on magnetic resonance images.
Kim YU; Kong YG; Lee J; Cheong Y; Kim Sh; Kim HK; Park JY; Suh JH
Eur Spine J; 2015 Oct; 24(10):2236-43. PubMed ID: 26292958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Increased Facet Fluid Predicts Dynamic Changes in the Dural Sac Size on Axial-Loaded MRI in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis.
Kanno H; Ozawa H; Koizumi Y; Morozumi N; Aizawa T; Itoi E
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2016 Apr; 37(4):730-5. PubMed ID: 26564439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Axial loading during magnetic resonance imaging in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis: does it reproduce the positional change of the dural sac detected by upright myelography?
Kanno H; Endo T; Ozawa H; Koizumi Y; Morozumi N; Itoi E; Ishii Y
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jul; 37(16):E985-92. PubMed ID: 21258271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reversibility of nerve root sedimentation sign in lumbar spinal stenosis patients after decompression surgery.
Barz C; Melloh M; Staub LP; Lord SJ; Merk HR; Barz T
Eur Spine J; 2017 Oct; 26(10):2573-2580. PubMed ID: 28161752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Visually assessed severity of lumbar spinal canal stenosis is paradoxically associated with leg pain and objective walking ability.
Kuittinen P; Sipola P; Saari T; Aalto TJ; Sinikallio S; Savolainen S; Kröger H; Turunen V; Leinonen V; Airaksinen O
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2014 Oct; 15():348. PubMed ID: 25319184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dynamic change of dural sac cross-sectional area in axial loaded magnetic resonance imaging correlates with the severity of clinical symptoms in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
Kanno H; Ozawa H; Koizumi Y; Morozumi N; Aizawa T; Kusakabe T; Ishii Y; Itoi E
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Feb; 37(3):207-13. PubMed ID: 21301392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Changes in dural sac caliber with standing MRI improve correlation with symptoms of lumbar spinal stenosis.
Lau YYO; Lee RKL; Griffith JF; Chan CLY; Law SW; Kwok KO
Eur Spine J; 2017 Oct; 26(10):2666-2675. PubMed ID: 28702785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term clinical and magnetic resonance imaging follow-up assessment of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis after laminectomy.
Herno A; Partanen K; Talaslahti T; Kaukanen E; Turunen V; Suomalainen O; Airaksinen O
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Aug; 24(15):1533-7. PubMed ID: 10457572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comprehensive study of patients with surgically treated lumbar spinal stenosis with neurogenic claudication.
Yukawa Y; Lenke LG; Tenhula J; Bridwell KH; Riew KD; Blanke K
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 Nov; 84(11):1954-9. PubMed ID: 12429755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Test-retest reproducibility of the exercise treadmill examination in lumbar spinal stenosis.
Deen HG; Zimmerman RS; Lyons MK; McPhee MC; Verheijde JL; Lemens SM
Mayo Clin Proc; 2000 Oct; 75(10):1002-7. PubMed ID: 11040847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: correlation with Oswestry Disability Index and MR imaging.
Sirvanci M; Bhatia M; Ganiyusufoglu KA; Duran C; Tezer M; Ozturk C; Aydogan M; Hamzaoglu A
Eur Spine J; 2008 May; 17(5):679-85. PubMed ID: 18324426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Verification of measurements of lumbar spinal dimensions in T1- and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging sequences.
Cheung JP; Shigematsu H; Cheung KM
Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1476-83. PubMed ID: 24314906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic advancement of axial loaded lumbar spine MRI in patients with clinically suspected central spinal canal stenosis.
Kim YK; Lee JW; Kim HJ; Yeom JS; Kang HS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Oct; 38(21):E1342-7. PubMed ID: 23797506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The sedimentation sign for differential diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis.
Macedo LG; Wang Y; Battié MC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 May; 38(10):827-31. PubMed ID: 23197008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Correlation Between Dural Sac Size in Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Symptoms in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
Zhou Z; Jin Z; Zhang P; Shan B; Zhou Z; Zhang Y; Deng Y; Zhou X
World Neurosurg; 2020 Feb; 134():e866-e873. PubMed ID: 31715409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
