178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18259814)
1. A technique for simulating the effect of dose reduction on image quality in digital chest radiography.
Veldkamp WJ; Kroft LJ; van Delft JP; Geleijns J
J Digit Imaging; 2009 Apr; 22(2):114-25. PubMed ID: 18259814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of scatter rejection and low-contrast performance of scan equalization digital radiography (SEDR), slot-scan digital radiography, and full-field digital radiography systems for chest phantom imaging.
Liu X; Shaw CC; Lai CJ; Wang T
Med Phys; 2011 Jan; 38(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 21361171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development of a chest digital tomosynthesis R/F system and implementation of low-dose GPU-accelerated compressed sensing (CS) image reconstruction.
Choi S; Lee H; Lee D; Choi S; Lee CL; Kwon W; Shin J; Seo CW; Kim HJ
Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):1871-1888. PubMed ID: 29500855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Method for simulating dose reduction in digital mammography using the Anscombe transformation.
Borges LR; Oliveira HCR; Nunes PF; Bakic PR; Maidment ADA; Vieira MAC
Med Phys; 2016 Jun; 43(6):2704-2714. PubMed ID: 27277017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Digital slot-scan charge-coupled device radiography versus AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography for detection of simulated nodules and interstitial disease in a chest phantom.
Kroft LJ; Geleijns J; Mertens BJ; Veldkamp WJ; Zonderland HM; de Roos A
Radiology; 2004 Apr; 231(1):156-63. PubMed ID: 14990807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development of a computer simulation technique for low-dose chest radiographs: a phantom study.
Murakami R; Katsuragawa S
Radiol Phys Technol; 2020 Mar; 13(1):111-118. PubMed ID: 32026403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Simulated dose reduction by adding artificial noise to measured raw data: a validation study.
Söderberg M; Gunnarsson M; Nilsson M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):71-7. PubMed ID: 20172933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Simulation of dose reduction in tomosynthesis.
Svalkvist A; Båth M
Med Phys; 2010 Jan; 37(1):258-69. PubMed ID: 20175489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Method of simulating dose reduction for digital radiographic systems.
Båth M; Håkansson M; Tingberg A; Månsson LG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):253-9. PubMed ID: 15933117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: effect of system noise.
Håkansson M; Båth M; Börjesson S; Kheddache S; Johnsson AA; Månsson LG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):97-101. PubMed ID: 15933088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. New developed DR detector performs radiographs of hand, pelvic and premature chest anatomies at a lower radiation dose and/or a higher image quality.
Precht H; Tingberg A; Waaler D; Outzen CB
J Digit Imaging; 2014 Feb; 27(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 24221693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A dual-view digital tomosynthesis imaging technique for improved chest imaging.
Zhong Y; Lai CJ; Wang T; Shaw CC
Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 42(9):5238-51. PubMed ID: 26328973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contrast-detail evaluation and dose assessment of eight digital chest radiography systems in clinical practice.
Veldkamp WJ; Kroft LJ; Boot MV; Mertens BJ; Geleijns J
Eur Radiol; 2006 Feb; 16(2):333-41. PubMed ID: 16132918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A method to produce and validate a digitally reconstructed radiograph-based computer simulation for optimisation of chest radiographs acquired with a computed radiography imaging system.
Moore CS; Liney GP; Beavis AW; Saunderson JR
Br J Radiol; 2011 Oct; 84(1006):890-902. PubMed ID: 21933979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Realistic simulation of reduced-dose CT with noise modeling and sinogram synthesis using DICOM CT images.
Won Kim C; Kim JH
Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 41(1):011901. PubMed ID: 24387509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detection of simulated nodules on clinical radiographs: dose reduction at digital posteroanterior chest radiography.
Kroft LJ; Veldkamp WJ; Mertens BJ; van Delft JP; Geleijns J
Radiology; 2006 Nov; 241(2):392-8. PubMed ID: 17057066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dose reduction and image quality improvement of chest radiography by using bone-suppression technique and low tube voltage: a phantom study.
Takagi S; Yaegashi T; Ishikawa M
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jan; 30(1):571-580. PubMed ID: 31385049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Conversion of mammographic images to appear with the noise and sharpness characteristics of a different detector and x-ray system.
Mackenzie A; Dance DR; Workman A; Yip M; Wells K; Young KC
Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2721-34. PubMed ID: 22559643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ultra-low dose chest computed tomography: Effect of iterative reconstruction levels on image quality.
Afadzi M; Lysvik EK; Andersen HK; Martinsen ACT
Eur J Radiol; 2019 May; 114():62-68. PubMed ID: 31005179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of flexible noise control (FNC) image processing parameters on portable chest radiography.
Kirby KM; Ren L; Daly TR; Tandon YK; Bartholmai BJ; Schueler BA; Long Z
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Dec; 23(12):e13812. PubMed ID: 36321326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
