177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18259814)
21. Comparison of eight different digital chest radiography systems: variation in detection of simulated chest disease.
Kroft LJ; Veldkamp WJ; Mertens BJ; Boot MV; Geleijns J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Aug; 185(2):339-46. PubMed ID: 16037503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Radiation dose reduction and improvement of image quality in digital chest radiography by new spatial noise reduction algorithm.
Lee W; Lee S; Chong S; Lee K; Lee J; Choi JC; Lim C
PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0228609. PubMed ID: 32084154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effects of optimization and image processing in digital chest radiography: an ROC study with an anthropomorphic phantom.
Kheddache S; Månsson LG; Angelhed JE; Denbratt L; Gottfridsson B; Schlossman D
Eur J Radiol; 1991; 13(2):143-50. PubMed ID: 1743193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Dose reduction in digital chest radiography and perceived image quality.
Kroft LJ; Veldkamp WJ; Mertens BJ; van Delft JP; Geleijns J
Br J Radiol; 2007 Dec; 80(960):984-8. PubMed ID: 17940130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Optimization of chest radiographic imaging parameters: a comparison of image quality and entrance skin dose for digital chest radiography systems.
Sun Z; Lin C; Tyan Y; Ng KH
Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 22726965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluating radiographic parameters for mobile chest computed radiography: phantoms, image quality and effective dose.
Rill LN; Brateman L; Arreola M
Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2727-35. PubMed ID: 14596311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Method for Simulating Dose Reduction in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
Borges LR; Guerrero I; Bakic PR; Foi A; Maidment ADA; Vieira MAC
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2017 Nov; 36(11):2331-2342. PubMed ID: 28641248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A comparative study based on image quality and clinical task performance for CT reconstruction algorithms in radiotherapy.
Li H; Dolly S; Chen HC; Anastasio MA; Low DA; Li HH; Michalski JM; Thorstad WL; Gay H; Mutic S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):377-390. PubMed ID: 27455472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Digital slot-scan charge-coupled device radiography versus AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography: comparison of image quality in a phantom study.
Veldkamp WJ; Kroft LJ; Mertens BJ; Geleijns J
Radiology; 2005 Jun; 235(3):857-66. PubMed ID: 15845787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Development and validation of a practical lower-dose-simulation tool for optimizing computed tomography scan protocols.
Yu L; Shiung M; Jondal D; McCollough CH
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(4):477-87. PubMed ID: 22805680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Development of DICOM image-based CT low dose simulator using fan-beam transform.
Horiuchi T; Yamamoto S; Murase K
Technol Health Care; 2013; 21(5):441-54. PubMed ID: 24004652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Synthetic CT: simulating low dose single and dual energy protocols from a dual energy scan.
Wang AS; Pelc NJ
Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5551-62. PubMed ID: 21992373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Relationship Between Tube Voltage and Physical Image Quality of Pulmonary Nodules on Chest Radiographs Obtained Using the Bone-Suppression Technique.
Takagi S; Yaegashi T; Ishikawa M
Acad Radiol; 2019 Jul; 26(7):e174-e179. PubMed ID: 30269955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Development of a digital chest phantom for studies on energy subtraction techniques].
Hayashi N; Taniguchi A; Noto K; Shimosegawa M; Ogura T; Doi K
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2014 Mar; 70(3):191-8. PubMed ID: 24647055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: effect of anatomical noise.
Båth M; Håkansson M; Börjesson S; Hoeschen C; Tischenko O; Kheddache S; Vikgren J; Månsson LG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):109-13. PubMed ID: 15933090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Computed radiography and direct radiography: influence of acquisition dose on the detection of simulated lung lesions.
Uffmann M; Prokop M; Eisenhuber E; Fuchsjäger M; Weber M; Schaefer-Prokop C
Invest Radiol; 2005 May; 40(5):249-56. PubMed ID: 15829821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Ultralow-dose chest computed tomography for pulmonary nodule detection: first performance evaluation of single energy scanning with spectral shaping.
Gordic S; Morsbach F; Schmidt B; Allmendinger T; Flohr T; Husarik D; Baumueller S; Raupach R; Stolzmann P; Leschka S; Frauenfelder T; Alkadhi H
Invest Radiol; 2014 Jul; 49(7):465-73. PubMed ID: 24598443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Technical Note: Phantom study to evaluate the dose and image quality effects of a computed tomography organ-based tube current modulation technique.
Gandhi D; Crotty DJ; Stevens GM; Schmidt TG
Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6572-8. PubMed ID: 26520748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of the image quality and dose reduction in digital radiography with an advanced spatial noise reduction algorithm in pediatric patients.
Oh S; Kim JH; Yoo SY; Jeon TY; Kim YJ
Eur Radiol; 2021 Dec; 31(12):8937-8946. PubMed ID: 34041570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Low contrast detectability and spatial resolution with model-based Iterative reconstructions of MDCT images: a phantom and cadaveric study.
Millon D; Vlassenbroek A; Van Maanen AG; Cambier SE; Coche EE
Eur Radiol; 2017 Mar; 27(3):927-937. PubMed ID: 27300195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
