These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18259814)

  • 41. Pediatric thoracic CT angiography at 70 kV: a phantom study to investigate the effects on image quality and radiation dose.
    MacDougall RD; Kleinman PL; Yu L; Lee EY
    Pediatr Radiol; 2016 Jul; 46(8):1114-9. PubMed ID: 26987734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The Use of Model-based Iterative Reconstruction to Optimize Chest CT Examinations for Diagnosing Lung Metastases in Patients with Sarcoma: A Phantom Study.
    Kaasalainen T; Mäkelä T; Kelaranta A; Kortesniemi M
    Acad Radiol; 2019 Jan; 26(1):50-61. PubMed ID: 29724675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. 1024-pixel image matrix for chest CT - Impact on image quality of bronchial structures in phantoms and patients.
    Euler A; Martini K; Baessler B; Eberhard M; Schoeck F; Alkadhi H; Frauenfelder T
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0234644. PubMed ID: 32544172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The reduction of image noise and streak artifact in the thoracic inlet during low dose and ultra-low dose thoracic CT.
    Paul NS; Blobel J; Prezelj E; Burey P; Ursani A; Menezes RJ; Kashani H; Siewerdsen JH
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Mar; 55(5):1363-80. PubMed ID: 20145292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effects of radiographic techniques on the low-contrast detail detectability performance of digital radiography systems.
    Alsleem H; U P; Mong KS; Davidson R
    Radiol Technol; 2014; 85(6):614-22. PubMed ID: 25002641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Radiation dose reduction in abdominal computed tomography during the late hepatic arterial phase using a model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm: how low can we go?
    Husarik DB; Marin D; Samei E; Richard S; Chen B; Jaffe TA; Bashir MR; Nelson RC
    Invest Radiol; 2012 Aug; 47(8):468-74. PubMed ID: 22717881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Effects of dose reduction on digital chest imaging using a selenium detector: a study of detecting simulated diffuse interstitial pulmonary disease.
    van Heesewijk HP; van der Graaf Y; de Valois JC; Feldberg MA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Aug; 167(2):403-8. PubMed ID: 8686616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparison of clinical and physical measures of image quality in chest and pelvis computed radiography at different tube voltages.
    Sandborg M; Tingberg A; Ullman G; Dance DR; Alm Carlsson G
    Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4169-75. PubMed ID: 17153395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Image quality, threshold contrast and mean glandular dose in CR mammography.
    Jakubiak RR; Gamba HR; Neves EB; Peixoto JE
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Sep; 58(18):6565-83. PubMed ID: 24002695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Modification of chest radiography exposure parameters using a neonatal chest phantom.
    Schäfer SB; Papst S; Fiebich M; Rudolph C; de Laffolie J; Krombach GA
    Pediatr Radiol; 2020 Jan; 50(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 31583441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Chest radiography: a comparison of image quality and effective dose using four digital systems.
    Pascoal A; Lawinski CP; Mackenzie A; Tabakov S; Lewis CA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):273-7. PubMed ID: 15933121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A method to incorporate the effect of beam quality on image noise in a digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR) based computer simulation for optimisation of digital radiography.
    Moore CS; Wood TJ; Saunderson JR; Beavis AW
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(18):7379-7393. PubMed ID: 28742062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Image quality of conventional images of dual-layer SPECTRAL CT: A phantom study.
    van Ommen F; Bennink E; Vlassenbroek A; Dankbaar JW; Schilham AMR; Viergever MA; de Jong HWAM
    Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3031-3042. PubMed ID: 29749624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: part of image background acting as pure noise.
    Båth M; Håkansson M; Börjesson S; Kheddache S; Grahn A; Bochud FO; Verdun FR; Månsson LG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):102-8. PubMed ID: 15933089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A projection image database to investigate factors affecting image quality in weight-based dosing: application to pediatric renal SPECT.
    Li Y; O'Reilly S; Plyku D; Treves ST; Du Y; Fahey F; Cao X; Jha AK; Sgouros G; Bolch WE; Frey EC
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jul; 63(14):145004. PubMed ID: 29893291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Dose efficiency and low-contrast detectability of an amorphous silicon x-ray detector for digital radiography.
    Aufrichtig R; Xue P
    Phys Med Biol; 2000 Sep; 45(9):2653-69. PubMed ID: 11008963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Distributions of scatter-to-primary and signal-to-noise ratios per pixel in digital chest imaging.
    Ullman G; Sandborg M; Dance DR; Hunt R; Alm Carlsson G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):355-8. PubMed ID: 15933136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Optimal beam quality for chest flat panel detector system: realistic phantom study.
    Kuwahara C; Aoki T; Oda N; Kawabata J; Sugimoto K; Kobayashi M; Fujii M; Korogi Y
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Sep; 29(9):4538-4543. PubMed ID: 30737566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Chest radiography with a digital flat-panel detector: experimental receiver operating characteristic analysis.
    Metz S; Damoser P; Hollweck R; Roggel R; Engelke C; Woertler K; Renger B; Rummeny EJ; Link TM
    Radiology; 2005 Mar; 234(3):776-84. PubMed ID: 15734933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Computed chest radiography for total body irradiation: image quality and clinical feasibility.
    Bouchez Q; Vandenbroucke D; Pittomvils G; Boterberg T; van Eijkeren M; Leblans P; Vanderstraeten B
    Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2024 Jun; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 38788700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.