1410 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18262014)
1. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stress distributions in adhesively cemented ceramic and resin-composite Class II inlay restorations: a 3D-FEA study.
Ausiello P; Rengo S; Davidson CL; Watts DC
Dent Mater; 2004 Nov; 20(9):862-72. PubMed ID: 15451242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Strength estimation of different designs of ceramic inlays and onlays in molars based on the Tsai-Wu failure criterion.
Dejak B; Mlotkowski A; Romanowicz M
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Aug; 98(2):89-100. PubMed ID: 17692590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Porcelain versus composite inlays/onlays: effects of mechanical loads on stress distribution, adhesion, and crown flexure.
Magne P; Belser UC
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2003 Dec; 23(6):543-55. PubMed ID: 14703758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro evaluation of push-out bond strength of direct ceramic inlays to tooth surface with fiber-reinforced composite at the interface.
Cekic I; Ergun G; Uctasli S; Lassila LV
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):271-8. PubMed ID: 17547945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement.
Palacios RP; Johnson GH; Phillips KM; Raigrodski AJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):104-14. PubMed ID: 16911887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efficient 3D finite element analysis of dental restorative procedures using micro-CT data.
Magne P
Dent Mater; 2007 May; 23(5):539-48. PubMed ID: 16730058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of zirconium-oxide ceramic surface treatments on the bond strength to adhesive resin.
Atsu SS; Kilicarslan MA; Kucukesmen HC; Aka PS
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):430-6. PubMed ID: 16765155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the biomechanical behavior of maxillary central incisors restored by means of endocrowns compared to a natural tooth: a 3D static linear finite elements analysis.
Zarone F; Sorrentino R; Apicella D; Valentino B; Ferrari M; Aversa R; Apicella A
Dent Mater; 2006 Nov; 22(11):1035-44. PubMed ID: 16406084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Finite element analysis of stresses in endodontically treated, dowel-restored teeth.
Asmussen E; Peutzfeldt A; Sahafi A
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):321-9. PubMed ID: 16198168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fracture resistance of maxillary premolars restored with direct and indirect adhesive techniques.
Santos MJ; Bezerra RB
J Can Dent Assoc; 2005 Sep; 71(8):585. PubMed ID: 16202199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays.
Hannig C; Westphal C; Becker K; Attin T
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 16198171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Finite element analysis of mechanism of cervical lesion formation in simulated molars during mastication and parafunction.
Dejak B; Mlotkowski A; Romanowicz M
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Dec; 94(6):520-9. PubMed ID: 16316798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Luting of ceramic inlays in vitro: marginal quality of self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesives versus self-etch cements.
Frankenberger R; Lohbauer U; Schaible RB; Nikolaenko SA; Naumann M
Dent Mater; 2008 Feb; 24(2):185-91. PubMed ID: 17544101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with indirect-composite and ceramic inlay systems.
Soares CJ; Martins LR; Pfeifer JM; Giannini M
Quintessence Int; 2004 Apr; 35(4):281-6. PubMed ID: 15119713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of cement type on the marginal adaptation of all-ceramic MOD inlays.
Rosentritt M; Behr M; Lang R; Handel G
Dent Mater; 2004 Jun; 20(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 15081553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Shear bond strength of tooth-colored indirect restorations bonded to coronal and cervical enamel.
Shimada Y; Tomimatsu N; Suzuki T; Uzzaman MA; Burrow MF; Tagami J
Oper Dent; 2005; 30(4):468-73. PubMed ID: 16130867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of different etching times of acidulated phosphate fluoride gel on the shear bond strength of high-leucite ceramics bonded to composite resin.
Kukiattrakoon B; Thammasitboon K
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jul; 98(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 17631170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of ceramic surface treatments on the tensile bond strength of composite resin to all-ceramic coping materials.
Kim BK; Bae HE; Shim JS; Lee KW
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):357-62. PubMed ID: 16198173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
