1982 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18262015)
1. Tensile bond strength of cast commercially pure titanium and cast gold-alloy posts and cores cemented with two luting agents.
Menani LR; Ribeiro RF; Antunes RP
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 18262015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of surface treatment of titanium posts on the tensile bond strength.
Schmage P; Sohn J; Ozcan M; Nergiz I
Dent Mater; 2006 Feb; 22(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 16039707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of two luting agents used for the retention of cast dowel and cores.
Habib B; von Fraunhofer JA; Driscoll CF
J Prosthodont; 2005 Sep; 14(3):164-9. PubMed ID: 16336233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with glass fiber reinforced posts and cast gold post and cores cemented with three cements.
Torres-Sánchez C; Montoya-Salazar V; Córdoba P; Vélez C; Guzmán-Duran A; Gutierrez-Pérez JL; Torres-Lagares D
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 23929374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An in vitro comparison of cast metal dowel retention using various luting agents and tensile loading.
Ertugrul HZ; Ismail YH
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 May; 93(5):446-52. PubMed ID: 15867754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Retention strengths of five luting cements on prefabricated dowels after root canal obturation with a zinc oxide/eugenol sealer: 1. Dowel space preparation/cementation at one week after obturation.
Hagge MS; Wong RD; Lindemuth JS
J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 12237797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of titanium dowel retention using four different luting agents.
Balbosh A; Ludwig K; Kern M
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Sep; 94(3):227-33. PubMed ID: 16126075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Retention of prefabricated and individually cast root canal posts in vitro.
Hedlund SO; Johansson NG; Sjögren G
Br Dent J; 2003 Aug; 195(3):155-8; discussion 147. PubMed ID: 12907984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The use of reinforced composite resin cement as compensation for reduced post length.
Nissan J; Dmitry Y; Assif D
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):304-8. PubMed ID: 11552168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of core diameter and surface treatment on the retention of resin composite cores to prefabricated endodontic posts.
Artopoulou II; O'Keefe KL; Powers JM
J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):172-9. PubMed ID: 16681499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An evaluation of retention and marginal seating of Ni-Cr alloy cast restorations using three different luting cements: an in vitro study.
Pattanaik BK; Nagda SJ
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 22842244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Various conditioning methods for root canals influencing the tensile strength of titanium posts.
Schmage P; Sohn J; Nergiz I; Ozcan M
J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Sep; 31(9):890-4. PubMed ID: 15369471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of airborne-particle abrasion on mechanical properties and bond strength of carbon/epoxy and glass/bis-GMA fiber-reinforced resin posts.
Soares CJ; Santana FR; Pereira JC; Araujo TS; Menezes MS
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jun; 99(6):444-54. PubMed ID: 18514666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of a resin-based sealer on crown retention for three types of cement.
Johnson GH; Hazelton LR; Bales DJ; Lepe X
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 May; 91(5):428-35. PubMed ID: 15153849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of endodontic post type (glass fiber, quartz fiber or gold) and luting material on push-out bond strength to dentin in vitro.
Kremeier K; Fasen L; Klaiber B; Hofmann N
Dent Mater; 2008 May; 24(5):660-6. PubMed ID: 17719082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of surface treatment on retention of glass-fiber endodontic posts.
Balbosh A; Kern M
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):218-23. PubMed ID: 16543019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of surface configuration on the retention of posts designed for use with a cast-on technique.
Rosin M; Fleissner P; Welk A; Steffen H; Heine B
Quintessence Int; 2001 Feb; 32(2):119-30. PubMed ID: 12066672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Retentive properties of five different luting cements on base and noble metal copings.
Ergin S; Gemalmaz D
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Nov; 88(5):491-7. PubMed ID: 12473998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effects of abutment taper, length and cement type on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
Bernal G; Okamura M; Muñoz CA
J Prosthodont; 2003 Jun; 12(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 12964683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tensile bond strength of dual curing resin-based cements to commercially pure titanium.
Schneider R; de Goes MF; Henriques GE; Chan DC
Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 16442156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
