613 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18262129)
1. Clinical evaluation of direct aperture optimization when applied to head-and-neck IMRT.
Jones S; Williams M
Med Dosim; 2008; 33(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 18262129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of IMRT planning with two-step and one-step optimization: a way to simplify IMRT.
Ludlum E; Xia P
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Feb; 53(3):807-21. PubMed ID: 18199916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of IMRT and leaf width on stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver and lung lesions.
Dvorak P; Georg D; Bogner J; Kroupa B; Dieckmann K; Pötter R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Apr; 61(5):1572-81. PubMed ID: 15817364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Verification of a rounded leaf-end MLC model used in a radiotherapy treatment planning system.
Williams MJ; Metcalfe P
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Feb; 51(4):N65-78. PubMed ID: 16467576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A difference-matrix metaheuristic for intensity map segmentation in step-and-shoot IMRT delivery.
Gunawardena AD; D'Souza WD; Goadrich LD; Meyer RR; Sorensen KJ; Naqvi SA; Shi L
Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2517-36. PubMed ID: 16675867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of IMRT planning with two-step and one-step optimization: a strategy for improving therapeutic gain and reducing the integral dose.
Abate A; Pressello MC; Benassi M; Strigari L
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Dec; 54(23):7183-98. PubMed ID: 19920309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosimetric comparison of helical tomotherapy and linac-IMRT treatment plans for head and neck cancer patients.
Zhang X; Penagaricano J; Moros EG; Corry PM; Yan Y; Ratanatharathorn V
Med Dosim; 2010; 35(4):264-8. PubMed ID: 19944587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Re-planning for compensator-based IMRT with original compensators.
Zhang G; Feygelman V; Stevens C; Li W; Leuthold S; Springett G; Hoffe S
Med Dosim; 2011; 36(1):102-8. PubMed ID: 20207532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A feasibility study of using conventional jaws to deliver IMRT plans in the treatment of prostate cancer.
Kim Y; Verhey LJ; Xia P
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(8):2147-56. PubMed ID: 17404460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dosimetric comparison of split field and fixed jaw techniques for large IMRT target volumes in the head and neck.
Srivastava SP; Das IJ; Kumar A; Johnstone PA
Med Dosim; 2011; 36(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 19944592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multileaf collimator end leaf leakage: implications for wide-field IMRT.
Hardcastle N; Metcalfe P; Ceylan A; Williams MJ
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Nov; 52(21):N493-504. PubMed ID: 17951847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing 3DCRT and inversely optimized IMRT planning for head and neck cancer: equivalence between step-and-shoot and sliding window techniques.
Longobardi B; De Martin E; Fiorino C; Dell'oca I; Broggi S; Cattaneo GM; Calandrino R
Radiother Oncol; 2005 Nov; 77(2):148-56. PubMed ID: 16260056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An examination of the number of required apertures for step-and-shoot IMRT.
Jiang Z; Earl MA; Zhang GW; Yu CX; Shepard DM
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Dec; 50(23):5653-63. PubMed ID: 16306659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lens dose in MLC-based IMRT treatments of the head and neck.
Pawlicki T; Luxton G; Le QT; Findley D; Ma CM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 May; 59(1):293-9. PubMed ID: 15093926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. On comparing the quality of head and neck IMRT plans delivered with two different linear accelerator manufacturers.
Basran PS; Balogh J; Poon I; MacKenzie R; Chan T
Med Dosim; 2011; 36(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 20346644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Direct aperture optimization of breast IMRT and the dosimetric impact of respiration motion.
Zhang G; Jiang Z; Shepard D; Zhang B; Yu C
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(20):N357-69. PubMed ID: 17019024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patient-specific IMRT verification using independent fluence-based dose calculation software: experimental benchmarking and initial clinical experience.
Georg D; Stock M; Kroupa B; Olofsson J; Nyholm T; Ahnesjö A; Karlsson M
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(16):4981-92. PubMed ID: 17671348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of the number of control points has on isodose distributions in a dynamic multileaf collimator intensity-modulated radiation therapy delivery.
Goraj A; de Boer SF
Med Dosim; 2012; 37(4):412-6. PubMed ID: 22572212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using total-variation regularization for intensity modulated radiation therapy inverse planning with field-specific numbers of segments.
Zhu L; Lee L; Ma Y; Ye Y; Mazzeo R; Xing L
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Dec; 53(23):6653-72. PubMed ID: 18997262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
