These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18262510)

  • 21. Stopping while going! Response inhibition does not suffer dual-task interference.
    Yamaguchi M; Logan GD; Bissett PG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Feb; 38(1):123-34. PubMed ID: 21574740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Dual-task processing when task 1 is hard and task 2 is easy: reversed central processing order?
    Leonhard T; Fernández SR; Ulrich R; Miller J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Feb; 37(1):115-36. PubMed ID: 20718575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Are spatial responses to visuospatial stimuli and spoken responses to auditory letters ideomotor-compatible tasks? Examination of set-size effects on dual-task interference.
    Shin YK; Proctor RW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Nov; 129(3):352-64. PubMed ID: 18845280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Regarding time-sharing with convergent operations.
    Tsang PS
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Feb; 121(2):137-75. PubMed ID: 16150414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. How Social and Refractory Is the Social Psychological Refractory Period?
    Wühr P; Heuer H
    Exp Psychol; 2017 Jul; 64(4):273-281. PubMed ID: 28922997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A parallel distributed processing model of stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response compatibility.
    Zhang HH; Zhang J; Kornblum S
    Cogn Psychol; 1999 May; 38(3):386-432. PubMed ID: 10328858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. General cognitive ability and the psychological refractory period: individual differences in the mind's bottleneck.
    Lee JJ; Chabris CF
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Jul; 24(7):1226-33. PubMed ID: 23744874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Separating limits on preparation versus online processing in multitasking paradigms: Evidence for resource models.
    Mittelstädt V; Miller J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Jan; 43(1):89-102. PubMed ID: 27808552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Contingent capture of visual-spatial attention depends on capacity-limited central mechanisms: evidence from human electrophysiology and the psychological refractory period.
    Brisson B; Leblanc E; Jolicoeur P
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Feb; 80(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 19000734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Motor limitation in dual-task processing under ballistic movement conditions.
    Ulrich R; Fernández SR; Jentzsch I; Rolke B; Schröter H; Leuthold H
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Sep; 17(9):788-93. PubMed ID: 16984296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effects of aging on reaction time in a signal detection task.
    Ratcliff R; Thapar A; McKoon G
    Psychol Aging; 2001 Jun; 16(2):323-41. PubMed ID: 11405319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evidence for a response preparation bottleneck during dual-task performance: effect of a startling acoustic stimulus on the psychological refractory period.
    Maslovat D; Chua R; Spencer HC; Forgaard CJ; Carlsen AN; Franks IM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Nov; 144(3):481-7. PubMed ID: 24076331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Still no evidence for perfect timesharing with two ideomotor-compatible tasks: a reply to Greenwald (2003).
    Lien MC; Proctor RW; Ruthroff E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Dec; 29(6):1267-72. PubMed ID: 14640843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Locus of backward crosstalk effects on task 1 in a psychological refractory period task.
    Ko YT; Miller J
    Exp Psychol; 2014 Jan; 61(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 23948390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Information continuity across the response selection bottleneck: early parallel Task 2 response activation contributes to overt Task 2 performance.
    Thomson SJ; Watter S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Jul; 75(5):934-53. PubMed ID: 23592183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Investigating limits of task prioritization in dual-tasking: evidence from the prioritized processing and the psychological refractory period paradigms.
    Rieger T; Mittelstädt V; Dignath D; Kiesel A
    Psychol Res; 2021 Feb; 85(1):384-396. PubMed ID: 31552483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Asymmetric interference in concurrent time-to-contact estimation: Cousin or twin of the psychological refractory period effect?
    Baurès R; DeLucia PR; Olson M; Oberfeld D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):698-711. PubMed ID: 27896708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cognitive neuroscience: searching for the bottleneck in the brain.
    Spence C
    Curr Biol; 2008 Oct; 18(20):R965-8. PubMed ID: 18957255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Dissociations between reaction times and temporal order judgments: a diffusion model approach.
    Miller J; Schwarz W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):394-412. PubMed ID: 16634678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Rational adaptation under task and processing constraints: implications for testing theories of cognition and action.
    Howes A; Lewis RL; Vera A
    Psychol Rev; 2009 Oct; 116(4):717-51. PubMed ID: 19839682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.