These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18262829)

  • 1. How position dependent is visual object recognition?
    Kravitz DJ; Vinson LD; Baker CI
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2008 Mar; 12(3):114-22. PubMed ID: 18262829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The recognition of partially visible natural objects in the presence and absence of their occluders.
    Johnson JS; Olshausen BA
    Vision Res; 2005 Nov; 45(25-26):3262-76. PubMed ID: 16043208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nonaccidental properties underlie shape recognition in Mammalian and nonmammalian vision.
    Gibson BM; Lazareva OF; Gosselin F; Schyns PG; Wasserman EA
    Curr Biol; 2007 Feb; 17(4):336-40. PubMed ID: 17275301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual, haptic and cross-modal recognition of objects and scenes.
    Woods AT; Newell FN
    J Physiol Paris; 2004; 98(1-3):147-59. PubMed ID: 15477029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the role of medial geometry in human vision.
    Kimia BB
    J Physiol Paris; 2003; 97(2-3):155-90. PubMed ID: 14766140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Object recognition by artificial cortical maps.
    Plebe A; Domenella RG
    Neural Netw; 2007 Sep; 20(7):763-80. PubMed ID: 17604954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recognition invariance obtained by extended and invariant features.
    Ullman S; Bart E
    Neural Netw; 2004; 17(5-6):833-48. PubMed ID: 15288901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The neuropsychology of object constancy.
    Turnbull OH; Carey DP; McCarthy RA
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 1997 May; 3(3):288-98. PubMed ID: 9161108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prior experience of rotation is not required for recognizing objects seen from different angles.
    Wang G; Obama S; Yamashita W; Sugihara T; Tanaka K
    Nat Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 8(12):1768-75. PubMed ID: 16299500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Combining feature- and correspondence-based methods for visual object recognition.
    Westphal G; Würtz RP
    Neural Comput; 2009 Jul; 21(7):1952-89. PubMed ID: 19292649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Object recognition and segmentation by a fragment-based hierarchy.
    Ullman S
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2007 Feb; 11(2):58-64. PubMed ID: 17188555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 'Breaking' position-invariant object recognition.
    Cox DD; Meier P; Oertelt N; DiCarlo JJ
    Nat Neurosci; 2005 Sep; 8(9):1145-7. PubMed ID: 16116453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: a critical assessment of recent research.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Oct; 47(12):2341-53. PubMed ID: 18723038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Top-down facilitation of visual object recognition: object-based and context-based contributions.
    Fenske MJ; Aminoff E; Gronau N; Bar M
    Prog Brain Res; 2006; 155():3-21. PubMed ID: 17027376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Shared computational mechanism for tilt compensation accounts for biased verticality percepts in motion and pattern vision.
    De Vrijer M; Medendorp WP; Van Gisbergen JA
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Feb; 99(2):915-30. PubMed ID: 18094098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Learning transform invariant object recognition in the visual system with multiple stimuli present during training.
    Stringer SM; Rolls ET
    Neural Netw; 2008 Sep; 21(7):888-903. PubMed ID: 18440774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Induced gamma band responses predict recognition delays during object identification.
    Martinovic J; Gruber T; Müller MM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jun; 19(6):921-34. PubMed ID: 17536963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Age of acquisition affects object recognition: evidence from visual duration thresholds.
    Dent K; Catling JC; Johnston RA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Jul; 125(3):301-18. PubMed ID: 17055443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Class information predicts activation by object fragments in human object areas.
    Lerner Y; Epshtein B; Ullman S; Malach R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 20(7):1189-206. PubMed ID: 18284342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mutual information of image fragments predicts categorization in humans: electrophysiological and behavioral evidence.
    Harel A; Ullman S; Epshtein B; Bentin S
    Vision Res; 2007 Jul; 47(15):2010-20. PubMed ID: 17499835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.