These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1826317)

  • 1. Integral processing of visual place and auditory voicing information during phonetic perception.
    Green KP; Kuhl PK
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Feb; 17(1):278-88. PubMed ID: 1826317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of visual information in the processing of place and manner features in speech perception.
    Green KP; Kuhl PK
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Jan; 45(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 2913568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of visual information in speech perception: evidence for a visual rate effect both with and without a McGurk effect.
    Brancazio L; Miller JL
    Percept Psychophys; 2005 Jul; 67(5):759-69. PubMed ID: 16334050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Facial identity and facial speech processing: familiar faces and voices in the McGurk effect.
    Walker S; Bruce V; O'Malley C
    Percept Psychophys; 1995 Nov; 57(8):1124-33. PubMed ID: 8539088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. McGurk effect in non-English listeners: few visual effects for Japanese subjects hearing Japanese syllables of high auditory intelligibility.
    Sekiyama K; Tohkura Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Oct; 90(4 Pt 1):1797-805. PubMed ID: 1960275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Integral processing of phonemes: evidence for a phonetic mode of perception.
    Tomiak GR; Mullennix JW; Sawusch JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Mar; 81(3):755-64. PubMed ID: 3584684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Temporal constraints on the McGurk effect.
    Munhall KG; Gribble P; Sacco L; Ward M
    Percept Psychophys; 1996 Apr; 58(3):351-62. PubMed ID: 8935896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lexical influences in audiovisual speech perception.
    Brancazio L; Brancazio L
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Jun; 30(3):445-63. PubMed ID: 15161378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A sex difference in visual influence on heard speech.
    Irwin JR; Whalen DH; Fowler CA
    Percept Psychophys; 2006 May; 68(4):582-92. PubMed ID: 16933423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visual influences on the internal structure of phonetic categories.
    Brancazio L; Miller JL; Paré MA
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 May; 65(4):591-601. PubMed ID: 12812281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Audio-visual identification of place of articulation and voicing in white and babble noise.
    Alm M; Behne DM; Wang Y; Eg R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jul; 126(1):377-87. PubMed ID: 19603894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neural Mechanisms Underlying Cross-Modal Phonetic Encoding.
    Shahin AJ; Backer KC; Rosenblum LD; Kerlin JR
    J Neurosci; 2018 Feb; 38(7):1835-1849. PubMed ID: 29263241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Auditory and visual cueing of the [+/- rounded] feature of vowels.
    Lisker L; Rossi M
    Lang Speech; 1992; 35 ( Pt 4)():391-417. PubMed ID: 1339920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sound location can influence audiovisual speech perception when spatial attention is manipulated.
    Tiippana K; Puharinen H; Möttönen R; Sams M
    Seeing Perceiving; 2011; 24(1):67-90. PubMed ID: 21406157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auditory-visual speech recognition by hearing-impaired subjects: consonant recognition, sentence recognition, and auditory-visual integration.
    Grant KW; Walden BE; Seitz PF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 May; 103(5 Pt 1):2677-90. PubMed ID: 9604361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Audio-visual speech perception is special.
    Tuomainen J; Andersen TS; Tiippana K; Sams M
    Cognition; 2005 May; 96(1):B13-22. PubMed ID: 15833302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of phonetic dimensions on aphasic speech perception.
    Hessler D; Jonkers R; Bastiaanse R
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2010 Dec; 24(12):980-96. PubMed ID: 20887215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cultural and linguistic factors in audiovisual speech processing: the McGurk effect in Chinese subjects.
    Sekiyama K
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Jan; 59(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 9038409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Degradation of labial information modifies audiovisual speech perception in cochlear-implanted children.
    Huyse A; Berthommier F; Leybaert J
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):110-21. PubMed ID: 23059850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Integrating speech information across talkers, gender, and sensory modality: female faces and male voices in the McGurk effect.
    Green KP; Kuhl PK; Meltzoff AN; Stevens EB
    Percept Psychophys; 1991 Dec; 50(6):524-36. PubMed ID: 1780200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.