These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18263954)

  • 1. Megavoltage cone beam digital tomosynthesis (MV-CBDT) for image-guided radiotherapy: a clinical investigational system.
    Pang G; Bani-Hashemi A; Au P; O'Brien PF; Rowlands JA; Morton G; Lim T; Cheung P; Loblaw A
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Feb; 53(4):999-1013. PubMed ID: 18263954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The adaptation of megavoltage cone beam CT for use in standard radiotherapy treatment planning.
    Thomas TH; Devakumar D; Purnima S; Ravindran BP
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Apr; 54(7):2067-77. PubMed ID: 19287087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A feasibility study on the use of digital tomosynthesis with individually-acquired megavoltage portal images for target localization.
    Sarkar V; Shi C; Rassiah-Szegedi P; Eng T; Diaz A; Papanikolaou N
    J BUON; 2009; 14(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 19365878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Phantom and in-vivo measurements of dose exposure by image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT): MV portal images vs. kV portal images vs. cone-beam CT.
    Walter C; Boda-Heggemann J; Wertz H; Loeb I; Rahn A; Lohr F; Wenz F
    Radiother Oncol; 2007 Dec; 85(3):418-23. PubMed ID: 18023491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Online planning and delivery technique for radiotherapy of spinal metastases using cone-beam CT: image quality and system performance.
    Létourneau D; Wong R; Moseley D; Sharpe MB; Ansell S; Gospodarowicz M; Jaffray DA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Mar; 67(4):1229-37. PubMed ID: 17336223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dose calculation on kV cone beam CT images: an investigation of the Hu-density conversion stability and dose accuracy using the site-specific calibration.
    Rong Y; Smilowitz J; Tewatia D; Tomé WA; Paliwal B
    Med Dosim; 2010; 35(3):195-207. PubMed ID: 19931031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Image distortion and spatial resolution of a commercially available cone-beam computed tomography machine.
    Ballrick JW; Palomo JM; Ruch E; Amberman BD; Hans MG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Oct; 134(4):573-82. PubMed ID: 18929276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of patient organ doses and effective doses using the VIP-Man adult male phantom for selected cone-beam CT imaging procedures during image guided radiation therapy.
    Gu J; Bednarz B; Xu XG; Jiang SB
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(4):431-43. PubMed ID: 18667400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measurement of cone beam CT coincidence with megavoltage isocentre and image sharpness using the QUASAR Penta-Guide phantom.
    Sykes JR; Lindsay R; Dean CJ; Brettle DS; Magee DR; Thwaites DI
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Oct; 53(19):5275-93. PubMed ID: 18758000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiation dose from cone beam computed tomography for image-guided radiation therapy.
    Kan MW; Leung LH; Wong W; Lam N
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Jan; 70(1):272-9. PubMed ID: 17980510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Megavoltage cone-beam CT: Recent developments and clinical applications].
    Pouliot J; Morin O; Aubin M; Aubry JF; Chen J; Speight J; Roach M
    Cancer Radiother; 2006 Sep; 10(5):258-68. PubMed ID: 16861025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A quantitative image quality comparison of four different image guided radiotherapy devices.
    Stützel J; Oelfke U; Nill S
    Radiother Oncol; 2008 Jan; 86(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 18031854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acquisition of MV-scatter-free kilovoltage CBCT images during RapidArc™ or VMAT.
    Ling C; Zhang P; Etmektzoglou T; Star-Lack J; Sun M; Shapiro E; Hunt M
    Radiother Oncol; 2011 Jul; 100(1):145-9. PubMed ID: 21821301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Shading correction algorithm for improvement of cone-beam CT images in radiotherapy.
    Marchant TE; Moore CJ; Rowbottom CG; MacKay RI; Williams PC
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Oct; 53(20):5719-33. PubMed ID: 18824785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Megavoltage cone-beam CT: system description and clinical applications.
    Morin O; Gillis A; Chen J; Aubin M; Bucci MK; Roach M; Pouliot J
    Med Dosim; 2006; 31(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 16551529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dose reduction for kilovotage cone-beam computed tomography in radiation therapy.
    Wang J; Li T; Liang Z; Xing L
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jun; 53(11):2897-909. PubMed ID: 18460749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality assurance for the geometric accuracy of cone-beam CT guidance in radiation therapy.
    Bissonnette JP; Moseley D; White E; Sharpe M; Purdie T; Jaffray DA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008; 71(1 Suppl):S57-61. PubMed ID: 18406939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Real-time 3D internal marker tracking during arc radiotherapy by the use of combined MV-kV imaging.
    Liu W; Wiersma RD; Mao W; Luxton G; Xing L
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Dec; 53(24):7197-213. PubMed ID: 19043177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Geometric accuracy of digital volume tomography and conventional computed tomography.
    Eggers G; Klein J; Welzel T; Mühling J
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Dec; 46(8):639-44. PubMed ID: 18490090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cone beam computerized tomography: the effect of calibration of the Hounsfield unit number to electron density on dose calculation accuracy for adaptive radiation therapy.
    Hatton J; McCurdy B; Greer PB
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):N329-46. PubMed ID: 19590116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.