BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18264184)

  • 1. The randomised controlled trial to meta-analysis ratio: original data versus systematic reviews in the medical literature.
    Bolland MJ; Grey A; Reid IR
    N Z Med J; 2007 Nov; 120(1265):U2804. PubMed ID: 18264184
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Randomised controlled trial to meta-analysis ratio: a reply from a group producing systematic reviews.
    Weir R; Bidwell S
    N Z Med J; 2007 Nov; 120(1266):U2843. PubMed ID: 18264210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.
    Leibovici L; Reeves D
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2005 Nov; 56(5):803-4. PubMed ID: 16166177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cochrane systematic reviews of treatments for peripheral nerve disorders.
    Hughes RA; Jewitt KM; Swan AV
    J Peripher Nerv Syst; 2004 Sep; 9(3):127-9. PubMed ID: 15363058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How to read and understand and use systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Leucht S; Kissling W; Davis JM
    Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2009 Jun; 119(6):443-50. PubMed ID: 19469725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Systematic reviews can be produced and published faster.
    Sampson M; Shojania KG; Garritty C; Horsley T; Ocampo M; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Jun; 61(6):531-6. PubMed ID: 18471656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Deconstructing evidence in orthodontics: making sense of systematic reviews, randomized clinical trials, and meta-analyses.
    Rinchuse DJ; Rinchuse DJ; Kandasamy S; Ackerman MB
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 18575311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study.
    Egger M; Juni P; Bartlett C; Holenstein F; Sterne J
    Health Technol Assess; 2003; 7(1):1-76. PubMed ID: 12583822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cochrane systematic reviews: time for an introduction and appraisal.
    Ling W; Farrell M; Ali R
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2004 Mar; 73(3):217-8. PubMed ID: 15036543
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Many reviews are systematic but some are more transparent and completely reported than others.
    PLoS Medicine Editors
    PLoS Med; 2007 Mar; 4(3):e147. PubMed ID: 17388685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Abecedary of the "Annales". Part 14].
    Slim K
    Ann Chir; 2006; 131(6-7):412-4. PubMed ID: 16806035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Introduction to systematic reviews.
    Goodwin GM; Geddes JR
    J Psychopharmacol; 2004 Jun; 18(2):249-50. PubMed ID: 15260914
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The reporting quality of meta-analyses improves: a random sampling study.
    Wen J; Ren Y; Wang L; Li Y; Liu Y; Zhou M; Liu P; Ye L; Li Y; Tian W
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 61(8):770-5. PubMed ID: 18411041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Should meta-analysts search Embase in addition to Medline?
    Robinson KA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Mar; 58(3):320; author reply 321. PubMed ID: 15718124
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How to read a review paper.
    Callcut RA; Branson RD
    Respir Care; 2009 Oct; 54(10):1379-85. PubMed ID: 19796419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How to use a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
    Tseng TY; Dahm P; Poolman RW; Preminger GM; Canales BJ; Montori VM
    J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1249-56. PubMed ID: 18707741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Growth and decentralization of the medical literature: implications for evidence-based medicine.
    Druss BG; Marcus SC
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2005 Oct; 93(4):499-501. PubMed ID: 16239948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intrapartum amnioinfusion for meconium-stained amniotic fluid: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.
    Sanchez-Ramos L
    BJOG; 2008 Feb; 115(3):409-10; author reply 410. PubMed ID: 18190380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Systematic reviews: much ado about a lot.
    Citrome L
    Int J Clin Pract; 2009 Jun; 63(6):832-3. PubMed ID: 19490190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.