BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18264521)

  • 1. Evaluating the effect of a sloping shoulder and a shoulder bevel on the marginal integrity of porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM) veneer crowns.
    Jalalian E; Jannati H; Mirzaei M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Feb; 9(2):17-24. PubMed ID: 18264521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Marginal adaptation of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM composite crowns using two different finish line preparation designs.
    Akbar JH; Petrie CS; Walker MP; Williams K; Eick JD
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):155-63. PubMed ID: 16681497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of the crown preparation margin and die type on the marginal accuracy of fiber-reinforced composite crowns.
    Ayad MF
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Feb; 9(2):9-16. PubMed ID: 18264520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of marginal fit between all-porcelain margin versus alumina-supported margin on Procera Alumina crowns.
    Limkangwalmongkol P; Kee E; Chiche GJ; Blatz MB
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):162-6. PubMed ID: 19178619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of finish line design on marginal adaptation of electroformed metal-ceramic crowns.
    Shiratsuchi H; Komine F; Kakehashi Y; Matsumura H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):237-42. PubMed ID: 16543022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Precision of fit of two margin designs for metal-ceramic crowns.
    Limkangwalmongkol P; Chiche GJ; Blatz MB
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):233-7. PubMed ID: 17451481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the marginal fit of pressable ceramic to metal ceramic restorations.
    Holden JE; Goldstein GR; Hittelman EL; Clark EA
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Dec; 18(8):645-8. PubMed ID: 19682215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of multiple firings on the marginal integrity of pressable ceramic single crowns.
    Cho SH; Nagy WW; Goodman JT; Solomon E; Koike M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jan; 107(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 22230912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Marginal adaption of two esthetic complete crowns.
    Nourallah H
    Egypt Dent J; 1995 Jul; 41(3):1277-82. PubMed ID: 9497669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Marginal fit of leucite-glass pressable ceramic restorations and ceramic-pressed-to-metal restorations.
    Goldin EB; Boyd NW; Goldstein GR; Hittelman EL; Thompson VP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Feb; 93(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 15674224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of marginal fit of 3 different metal-ceramic systems: an in vitro study.
    Pettenò D; Schierano G; Bassi F; Bresciano ME; Carossa S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(5):405-8. PubMed ID: 11203662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of recasting palladium-silver alloy on the fit of crowns with different marginal configurations.
    Lopes MB; Consani S; Sinhoreti MA; Correr-Sobrinho L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Nov; 94(5):430-4. PubMed ID: 16275302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the marginal fit of three margin designs of resin composite crowns using CAD/CAM.
    Tsitrou EA; Northeast SE; van Noort R
    J Dent; 2007 Jan; 35(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 16781043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Marginal and internal fit of metal-ceramic crowns fabricated with a new laser melting technology.
    Quante K; Ludwig K; Kern M
    Dent Mater; 2008 Oct; 24(10):1311-5. PubMed ID: 18384869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nondestructive, in vitro quantification of crown margins.
    Mitchell CA; Pintado MR; Douglas WH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):575-84. PubMed ID: 11404758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of all-ceramic and porcelain-fused-to-metal restorations on marginal peri-implant soft tissue color: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Jung RE; Holderegger C; Sailer I; Khraisat A; Suter A; Hämmerle CH
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Aug; 28(4):357-65. PubMed ID: 18717374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An in vitro assessment of a ceramic-pressed-to-metal system as an alternative to conventional metal ceramic systems.
    Fahmy NZ; Salah E
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Dec; 20(8):621-7. PubMed ID: 22182223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of occlusal surface relief of dies on marginal adaptation of metal-ceramic casting copings.
    Saber FS; Abolfazli N; Mahboub F; Razavi FE
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Jun; 22(4):287-91. PubMed ID: 23279044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of porcelain veneer extension on strength of metal ceramic crowns.
    Lund PS; Barber BA
    Int J Prosthodont; 1992; 5(3):237-43. PubMed ID: 1524646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of preparation convergence on retention and seating discrepancy of complete veneer crowns.
    Chan DC; Wilson AH; Barbe P; Cronin RJ; Chung C; Chung K
    J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Jan; 32(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 15634303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.