143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18265606)
1. How implicitly activated and explicitly acquired knowledge contribute to the effectiveness of retrieval cues.
Nelson DL; Fisher SL; Akirmak U
Mem Cognit; 2007 Dec; 35(8):1892-904. PubMed ID: 18265606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. What is preexisting strength? Predicting free association probabilities, similarity ratings, and cued recall probabilities.
Nelson DL; Dyrdal GM; Goodmon LB
Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Aug; 12(4):711-9. PubMed ID: 16447386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Selective access in cued recall: the roles of retrieval cues and domains of encoding.
McEvoy CL; Nelson DL
Mem Cognit; 1990 Jan; 18(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 2314223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Implicitly activated memories are associated to general context cues.
Nelson DL; Goodmon LB; Akirmak U
Mem Cognit; 2007 Dec; 35(8):1878-91. PubMed ID: 18265605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prior knowledge: the effects of natural category size on memory for implicitly encoded concepts.
Nelson DL; Bajo MT; McEvoy CL; Schreiber TA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Sep; 15(5):957-67. PubMed ID: 2528608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Altering memory through recall: the effects of cue-guided retrieval processing.
McDaniel MA; Kowitz MD; Dunay PK
Mem Cognit; 1989 Jul; 17(4):423-34. PubMed ID: 2761400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lexical and semantic search in cued recall, fragment completion, perceptual identification, and recognition.
Nelson DL; McEvoy CL; Bajo MT
Am J Psychol; 1988; 101(4):465-80. PubMed ID: 3232723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing word fragment completion and cued recall with letter cues.
Nelson DL; Canas JJ; Bajo MT; Keelean PD
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1987 Oct; 13(4):542-52. PubMed ID: 2959738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of implicit memory on explicit recall: set size and word-frequency effects.
Nelson DL; Xu J
Psychol Res; 1995; 57(3-4):203-14. PubMed ID: 7753950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Generation and associative encoding in young and old adults: the effect of the strength of association between cues and targets on a cued recall task.
Taconnat L; Froger C; Sacher M; Isingrini M
Exp Psychol; 2008; 55(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 18271350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cued recall from image and sentence memory: a shift from episodic to identical elements representation.
Rickard TC; Bajic D
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):734-48. PubMed ID: 16822144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Implicit processing in the cued recall of young and old adults.
McEvoy CL; Nelson DL; Holley PE; Stelnicki GS
Psychol Aging; 1992 Sep; 7(3):401-8. PubMed ID: 1388861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Recency effects in direct and indirect memory tasks.
McKenzie WA; Humphreys MS
Mem Cognit; 1991 Jul; 19(4):321-31. PubMed ID: 1895942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Transfer of Test-Enhanced Learning.
DiMarco D; Marmurek H
Exp Psychol; 2022 May; 69(3):119-131. PubMed ID: 35975624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of backward priming on word recognition in single-word and sentence contexts.
Peterson RR; Simpson GB
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Nov; 15(6):1020-32. PubMed ID: 2530304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. One step is not enough: making better use of association norms to predict cued recall.
Nelson DL; Bennett DJ; Leibert TW
Mem Cognit; 1997 Nov; 25(6):785-96. PubMed ID: 9421564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Generation enhances semantic processing? The role of distinctiveness in the generation effect.
Kinoshita S
Mem Cognit; 1989 Sep; 17(5):563-71. PubMed ID: 2796741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In search of cross-talk facilitation in a dual-cued recall task.
Rickard TC; Bajic D
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jul; 31(4):750-67. PubMed ID: 16060778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Testing an associative account of semantic satiation.
Tian X; Huber DE
Cogn Psychol; 2010 Jun; 60(4):267-90. PubMed ID: 20156620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Retrieval processes in recognition and cued recall.
Nobel PA; Shiffrin RM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Mar; 27(2):384-413. PubMed ID: 11294440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
