These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18265606)

  • 41. Are implicitly activated associates selectively activated?
    Nelson DL; McKinney VM; McEvoy CL
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Mar; 10(1):118-24. PubMed ID: 12747498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A dissociation in the effects of study modality on tests of implicit and explicit memory.
    Hayman CA; Rickards C
    Mem Cognit; 1995 Jan; 23(1):95-112. PubMed ID: 7885269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Support for an auto-associative model of spoken cued recall: evidence from fMRI.
    de Zubicaray G; McMahon K; Eastburn M; Pringle AJ; Lorenz L; Humphreys MS
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Mar; 45(4):824-35. PubMed ID: 16989874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. How does delayed testing reduce effects of implicit memory: context infusion or cuing with context?
    Nelson DL; Goodmon LB; Ceo D
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Jul; 35(5):1014-23. PubMed ID: 17910185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Conjunction errors, recollection-based rejections, and forgetting in a continuous recognition task.
    Jones TC; Atchley P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):70-8. PubMed ID: 16478341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Are independent probes truly independent?
    Camp G; Pecher D; Schmidt HG; Zeelenberg R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):934-42. PubMed ID: 19586262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. What types of learning are enhanced by a cued recall test?
    Carpenter SK; Pashler H; Vul E
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Oct; 13(5):826-30. PubMed ID: 17328380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Retrieval-induced forgetting in item recognition: evidence for a reduction in general memory strength.
    Spitzer B; Bäuml KH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):863-75. PubMed ID: 17723065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Disrupting attention: the need for retrieval cues in working memory theories.
    Nelson DL; Goodmon LB
    Mem Cognit; 2003 Jan; 31(1):65-76. PubMed ID: 12699144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Retrieval constraints on associative elaborations.
    Marks W
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1987 Apr; 13(2):301-9. PubMed ID: 2952759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Implicit memory: effects of network size and interconnectivity on cued recall.
    Nelson DL; Bennett DJ; Gee NR; Schreiber TA; McKinney VM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1993 Jul; 19(4):747-64. PubMed ID: 8345322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Semantic organization and verbal episodic memory in patients with mild and moderate Alzheimer's disease.
    Herlitz A; Viitanen M
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1991 Jul; 13(4):559-74. PubMed ID: 1918286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Generation effects in free recall: further support for a three-factor theory.
    McDaniel MA; Riegler GL; Waddill PJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 Sep; 16(5):789-98. PubMed ID: 2147443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Reinstating higher order properties of a study list by retrieving a list item.
    Humphreys MS; Murray KL; Koh JY
    Mem Cognit; 2014 May; 42(4):570-82. PubMed ID: 24307169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Word-fragment cuing: the lexical search hypothesis.
    Nelson DL; Keelean PD; Negrao M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 May; 15(3):388-97. PubMed ID: 2524544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Sequential effects in lexical decision: tests of compound-cue retrieval theory.
    Ratcliff R; McKoon G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 Sep; 21(5):1380-8. PubMed ID: 8744970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The generation effect: a test between single- and multifactor theories.
    Burns DJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 Nov; 16(6):1060-7. PubMed ID: 2148579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Word associations are formed incidentally during sentential semantic integration.
    Prior A; Bentin S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jan; 127(1):57-71. PubMed ID: 17367741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. In a Concurrent Memory and Auditory Perception Task, the Pupil Dilation Response Is More Sensitive to Memory Load Than to Auditory Stimulus Characteristics.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Rönnberg J; Rudner M
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(2):272-286. PubMed ID: 29923867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Attentional limits in memory retrieval.
    Carrier LM; Pashler H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 Sep; 21(5):1339-48. PubMed ID: 8744967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.