These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18265845)

  • 1. Sensitivity to feature displacement in familiar and unfamiliar faces: beyond the internal/external feature distinction.
    Brooks KR; Kemp RI
    Perception; 2007; 36(11):1646-59. PubMed ID: 18265845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of familiarity on spatial frequency thresholds for face matching.
    Watier NN; Collin CA
    Perception; 2009; 38(10):1497-507. PubMed ID: 19950481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Revisiting the processing of internal and external features of unfamiliar faces: the headscarf effect.
    Megreya AM; Bindemann M
    Perception; 2009; 38(12):1831-48. PubMed ID: 20192132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Familiar and unfamiliar face recognition: a review.
    Johnston RA; Edmonds AJ
    Memory; 2009 Jul; 17(5):577-96. PubMed ID: 19548173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The importance of internal facial features in learning new faces.
    Longmore CA; Liu CH; Young AW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(2):249-60. PubMed ID: 25203612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identification of familiar and unfamiliar faces from internal and external features: some implications for theories of face recognition.
    Ellis HD; Shepherd JW; Davies GM
    Perception; 1979; 8(4):431-9. PubMed ID: 503774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An adaptation study of internal and external features in facial representations.
    Hills C; Romano K; Davies-Thompson J; Barton JJ
    Vision Res; 2014 Jul; 100():18-28. PubMed ID: 24747020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Matching familiar and unfamiliar faces on internal and external features.
    Young AW; Hay DC; McWeeny KH; Flude BM; Ellis AW
    Perception; 1985; 14(6):737-46. PubMed ID: 3837875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of inversion and eye displacements of familiar and unknown faces on early and late-stage ERPs.
    Caharel S; Fiori N; Bernard C; Lalonde R; Rebaï M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Oct; 62(1):141-51. PubMed ID: 16678927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of feature displacement on the perception of well-known faces.
    Hosie JA; Ellis HD; Haig ND
    Perception; 1988; 17(4):461-74. PubMed ID: 3244519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A contextual effect of 2nd-order configural processing of non-face objects by non-experts.
    Matheson HE; McMullen PA
    Perception; 2009; 38(7):1072-86. PubMed ID: 19764308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exploring levels of face familiarity by using an indirect face-matching measure.
    Clutterbuck R; Johnston RA
    Perception; 2002; 31(8):985-94. PubMed ID: 12269591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attention to internal face features in unfamiliar face matching.
    Fletcher KI; Butavicius MA; Lee MD
    Br J Psychol; 2008 Aug; 99(Pt 3):379-94. PubMed ID: 17706001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 7-11-year-old children show an advantage for matching and recognizing the internal features of familiar faces: evidence against a developmental shift.
    Bonner L; Burton M
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Aug; 57(6):1019-29. PubMed ID: 15370514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-term information and distributed neural activation are relevant for the "internal features advantage" in face processing: electrophysiological and source reconstruction evidence.
    Olivares EI; Saavedra C; Trujillo-Barreto NJ; Iglesias J
    Cortex; 2013; 49(10):2735-47. PubMed ID: 24025156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recovering faces from memory: the distracting influence of external facial features.
    Frowd CD; Skelton F; Atherton C; Pitchford M; Hepton G; Holden L; McIntyre AH; Hancock PJ
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2012 Jun; 18(2):224-38. PubMed ID: 22545929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Configurational information in face perception.
    Young AW; Hellawell D; Hay DC
    Perception; 1987; 16(6):747-59. PubMed ID: 3454432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How macaques view familiarity and gaze in conspecific faces.
    Leonard TK; Blumenthal G; Gothard KM; Hoffman KL
    Behav Neurosci; 2012 Dec; 126(6):781-91. PubMed ID: 23067381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of scanpaths in facial recognition and learning.
    Rizzo M; Hurtig R; Damasio AR
    Ann Neurol; 1987 Jul; 22(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 3631920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Familiar Face Detection in 180 ms.
    Visconti di Oleggio Castello M; Gobbini MI
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0136548. PubMed ID: 26305788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.