These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18265846)

  • 1. Perception of novel faces: the parts have it!
    Lobmaier JS; Mast FW
    Perception; 2007; 36(11):1660-73. PubMed ID: 18265846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Featural, configural, and holistic face-processing strategies evoke different scan patterns.
    Bombari D; Mast FW; Lobmaier JS
    Perception; 2009; 38(10):1508-21. PubMed ID: 19950482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Face imagery is based on featural representations.
    Lobmaier JS; Mast FW
    Exp Psychol; 2008; 55(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 18271353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Emotion recognition: the role of featural and configural face information.
    Bombari D; Schmid PC; Schmid Mast M; Birri S; Mast FW; Lobmaier JS
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(12):2426-42. PubMed ID: 23679155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of geometric distortions on face-recognition performance.
    Hole GJ; George PA; Eaves K; Rasek A
    Perception; 2002; 31(10):1221-40. PubMed ID: 12430949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Categorical perception effects for facial identity in robustly represented familiar and self-faces: the role of configural and featural information.
    Keyes H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(4):760-72. PubMed ID: 22248095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The face inversion effect--parts and wholes: individual features and their configuration.
    Civile C; McLaren RP; McLaren IP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(4):728-46. PubMed ID: 24063659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Losing face: impaired discrimination of featural and configural information in the mouth region of an inverted face.
    Tanaka JW; Kaiser MD; Hagen S; Pierce LJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 May; 76(4):1000-14. PubMed ID: 24477773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spatial-frequency thresholds for configural and featural discriminations in upright and inverted faces.
    Watier NN; Collin CA; Boutet I
    Perception; 2010; 39(4):502-13. PubMed ID: 20514998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does face inversion qualitatively change face processing: an eye movement study using a face change detection task.
    Xu B; Tanaka JW
    J Vis; 2013 Feb; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 23420421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The movement advantage in famous and unfamiliar faces: a comparison of point-light displays and shape-normalised avatar stimuli.
    Bennetts RJ; Kim J; Burke D; Brooks KR; Lucey S; Saragih J; Robbins RA
    Perception; 2013; 42(9):950-70. PubMed ID: 24386715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Processing of configural and componential information in face-selective cortical areas.
    Zhao M; Cheung SH; Wong AC; Rhodes G; Chan EK; Chan WW; Hayward WG
    Cogn Neurosci; 2014; 5(3-4):160-7. PubMed ID: 24784503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Two routes to face perception: evidence from psychophysics and computational modeling.
    Schwaninger A; Lobmaier JS; Wallraven C; Collishaw S
    Cogn Sci; 2009 Nov; 33(8):1413-40. PubMed ID: 21585511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Featural and configurational processes in the recognition of faces of different familiarity.
    Collishaw SM; Hole GJ
    Perception; 2000; 29(8):893-909. PubMed ID: 11145082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Featural and configural face processing strategies: evidence from a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.
    Lobmaier JS; Klaver P; Loenneker T; Martin E; Mast FW
    Neuroreport; 2008 Feb; 19(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 18303568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tolerance for distorted faces: challenges to a configural processing account of familiar face recognition.
    Sandford A; Burton AM
    Cognition; 2014 Sep; 132(3):262-8. PubMed ID: 24853629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The shape of the face template: geometric distortions of faces and their detection in natural scenes.
    Pongakkasira K; Bindemann M
    Vision Res; 2015 Apr; 109(Pt A):99-106. PubMed ID: 25727491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Configural features in the context of upright and inverted faces.
    Leder H; Candrian G; Huber O; Bruce V
    Perception; 2001; 30(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 11257979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Configural processing and face viewpoint.
    McKone E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):310-27. PubMed ID: 18377173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is there a linear or a nonlinear relationship between rotation and configural processing of faces?
    Collishaw SM; Hole GJ
    Perception; 2002; 31(3):287-96. PubMed ID: 11954691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.