These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
13. Performance in specular reflection and slit-imaging corneal topography. Braaf B; Dubbelman M; van der Heijde RG; Sicam VA Optom Vis Sci; 2009 May; 86(5):467-75. PubMed ID: 19342978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of corneal power measurements by a new Scheimpflug camera combined with Placido-disk corneal topography for intraocular lens power calculation in unoperated eyes. Savini G; Barboni P; Carbonelli M; Hoffer KJ J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 May; 38(5):787-92. PubMed ID: 22386277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of a support vector machine for keratoconus and subclinical keratoconus detection by topographic and tomographic data. Arbelaez MC; Versaci F; Vestri G; Barboni P; Savini G Ophthalmology; 2012 Nov; 119(11):2231-8. PubMed ID: 22892148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Role of Ocular Response Analyzer in Differentiation of Forme Fruste Keratoconus From Corneal Astigmatism. Kirgiz A; Karaman Erdur S; Atalay K; Gurez C Eye Contact Lens; 2019 Mar; 45(2):83-87. PubMed ID: 30265255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mild topographic abnormalities that become more suspicious on Scheimpflug imaging. Wolf A; Abdallat W; Kollias A; Frohlich SJ; Grueterich M; Lackerbauer CA Eur J Ophthalmol; 2009; 19(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 19123143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of keratoconus grades on repeatability of keratometry readings: Comparison of 5 devices. Hashemi H; Yekta A; Khabazkhoob M J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 May; 41(5):1065-72. PubMed ID: 26049838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]