These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18266164)

  • 1. Reasons for non-attendance at cervical screening as reported by non-attendees in Sweden.
    Oscarsson MG; Benzein EG; Wijma BE
    J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Mar; 29(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 18266164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reasons women do not attend screening for cervical cancer: a population-based study in Sweden.
    Eaker S; Adami HO; Sparén P
    Prev Med; 2001 Jun; 32(6):482-91. PubMed ID: 11394952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How do women who choose not to participate in population-based cervical cancer screening reason about their decision?
    Blomberg K; Ternestedt BM; Törnberg S; Tishelman C
    Psychooncology; 2008 Jun; 17(6):561-9. PubMed ID: 17886262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden.
    Andrae B; Kemetli L; Sparén P; Silfverdal L; Strander B; Ryd W; Dillner J; Törnberg S
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(9):622-9. PubMed ID: 18445828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A population-based study of primary care predictors of non-attendance for cervical screening.
    Webb R; Richardson J; Pickles A
    J Med Screen; 2004; 11(3):135-40. PubMed ID: 15333272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reasons for non-attendance in cervical cancer screening programmes: an application of the Integrated Model for Behavioural Change.
    Knops-Dullens T; de Vries N; de Vries H
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2007 Oct; 16(5):436-45. PubMed ID: 17923815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Who attends skin cancer clinics within a randomized melanoma screening program?
    Youl PH; Janda M; Elwood M; Lowe JB; Ring IT; Aitken JF
    Cancer Detect Prev; 2006; 30(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 16457967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predictors and effectiveness of diabetes self-management education in clinical practice.
    Shah BR; Booth GL
    Patient Educ Couns; 2009 Jan; 74(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 18805668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cervical cancer screening in the Ferrara Local Health Authority catchment area.
    Bergamini M; Buriani O; Cucchi A; De Togni A; Carpanelli MC; Cervato K; Gigli F; Pizzo F; Ravasini G; Rauli G; Rizzello R; Gregorio P
    J Prev Med Hyg; 2007 Dec; 48(4):141-8. PubMed ID: 18557309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Social support and cervical and breast cancer screening in Argentinean women from a rural population.
    Gamarra CJ; Paz EP; Griep RH
    Public Health Nurs; 2009; 26(3):269-76. PubMed ID: 19386062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Response patterns to a postal survey using a cervical screening register as the sampling frame.
    Olowokure B; Caswell M; Duggal HV
    Public Health; 2004 Oct; 118(7):508-12. PubMed ID: 15351224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attending cervical cancer screening, opportunities and obstacles: a qualitative study on midwives' experiences telephoning non-attendees in Sweden.
    Broberg G; Strander B; Ellis J; Adolfsson A
    Scand J Public Health; 2014 Nov; 42(7):691-7. PubMed ID: 25013212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Knowledge, attitude and practice of screening for cervical cancer among female students of a tertiary institution in South Eastern Nigeria.
    Akujobi CN; Ikechebelu JI; Onunkwo I; Onyiaorah IV
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2008 Sep; 11(3):216-9. PubMed ID: 19140357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Strong discomfort during vaginal examination: why consider a history of abuse?
    Swahnberg K; Wijma B; Siwe K
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Aug; 157(2):200-5. PubMed ID: 21470763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Barriers to cervical cancer screening attendance in England: a population-based survey.
    Waller J; Bartoszek M; Marlow L; Wardle J
    J Med Screen; 2009; 16(4):199-204. PubMed ID: 20054095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Why do women participate in the English cervical cancer screening programme?
    Whynes DK; Philips Z; Avis M
    J Health Econ; 2007 Mar; 26(2):306-25. PubMed ID: 17010459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of a history of child sexual assault on women's decisions and experiences of cervical screening.
    Harsanyi A; Mott S; Kendall S; Blight A
    Aust Fam Physician; 2003 Sep; 32(9):761-2. PubMed ID: 14524223
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inadequate cervical cancer screening among mid-aged Australian women who have experienced partner violence.
    Loxton D; Powers J; Schofield M; Hussain R; Hosking S
    Prev Med; 2009 Feb; 48(2):184-8. PubMed ID: 19026675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marrying research, clinical practice and cervical screening in Australian Aboriginal women in western New South Wales, Australia.
    Read CM; Bateson DJ
    Rural Remote Health; 2009; 9(2):1117. PubMed ID: 19459723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. 'I got a letter...' a qualitative study of women's reasoning about attendance in a cervical cancer screening programme in urban Sweden.
    Forss A; Tishelman C; Widmark C; Lundgren E; Sachs L; Törnberg S
    Psychooncology; 2001; 10(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 11180579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.