These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18266210)

  • 1. Commonly cited website quality criteria are not effective at identifying inaccurate online information about breast cancer.
    Bernstam EV; Walji MF; Sagaram S; Sagaram D; Johnson CW; Meric-Bernstam F
    Cancer; 2008 Mar; 112(6):1206-13. PubMed ID: 18266210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficacy of quality criteria to identify potentially harmful information: a cross-sectional survey of complementary and alternative medicine web sites.
    Walji M; Sagaram S; Sagaram D; Meric-Bernstam F; Johnson C; Mirza NQ; Bernstam EV
    J Med Internet Res; 2004 Jun; 6(2):e21. PubMed ID: 15249270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Searching for cancer-related information online: unintended retrieval of complementary and alternative medicine information.
    Walji M; Sagaram S; Meric-Bernstam F; Johnson CW; Bernstam EV
    Int J Med Inform; 2005 Aug; 74(7-8):685-93. PubMed ID: 16027034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What do evaluation instruments tell us about the quality of complementary medicine information on the internet?
    Breckons M; Jones R; Morris J; Richardson J
    J Med Internet Res; 2008 Jan; 10(1):e3. PubMed ID: 18244894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Systematic internet-based review of complementary and alternative medicine for glaucoma.
    Gunasekera V; Ernst E; Ezra DG
    Ophthalmology; 2008 Mar; 115(3):435-439.e2. PubMed ID: 17900696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Currency of online breast cancer information.
    Meric-Bernstam F; Walji M; Sagaram S; Sagaram D; Bernstam E
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2007; 129(Pt 2):973-6. PubMed ID: 17911860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cancer-related complementary and alternative medicine online: factors affecting information retrieval.
    Walji M; Sagaram S; Meric-Bernstam F; Johnson C; Bernstam E
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 2):1318-22. PubMed ID: 15361028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing cancer treatment related information online: unintended retrieval of complementary and alternative medicine web sites.
    Kim DY; Lee HR; Nam EM
    Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2009 Jan; 18(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 18771532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Introducing a composite index of information quality for medical web sites.
    Cabitza F
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 180():1162-4. PubMed ID: 22874387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relative quality of internet-derived gastrointestinal cancer information.
    Chan DS; Willicombe A; Reid TD; Beaton C; Arnold D; Ward J; Davies IL; Lewis WG
    J Cancer Educ; 2012 Dec; 27(4):676-9. PubMed ID: 22918796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Indicators of accuracy of consumer health information on the Internet: a study of indicators relating to information for managing fever in children in the home.
    Fallis D; Frické M
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2002; 9(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 11751805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patient-oriented methotrexate information sites on the Internet: a review of completeness, accuracy, format, reliability, credibility, and readability.
    Thompson AE; Graydon SL
    J Rheumatol; 2009 Jan; 36(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 19004031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Complementary and alternative medicine and supportive care at leading cancer centers: a systematic analysis of websites.
    Brauer JA; El Sehamy A; Metz JM; Mao JJ
    J Altern Complement Med; 2010 Feb; 16(2):183-6. PubMed ID: 20180691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Crowdsourcing and the Accuracy of Online Information Regarding Weight Gain in Pregnancy: A Descriptive Study.
    Chang T; Verma BA; Shull T; Moniz MH; Kohatsu L; Plegue MA; Collins-Thompson K
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Apr; 18(4):e81. PubMed ID: 27056465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of Online Information on Complementary and Alternative Treatments for Dry Eye Disease.
    Rapata MEJ; Meyer JJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2021 Apr; 98(4):355-361. PubMed ID: 33852552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Partial nephrectomy online: a preliminary evaluation of the quality of health information on the Internet.
    Fast AM; Deibert CM; Boyer C; Hruby GW; McKiernan JM
    BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt B):E765-9. PubMed ID: 23107114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inter-observer agreement for quality measures applied to online health information.
    Sagaram S; Walji M; Meric-Bernstam F; Johnson C; Bernstam E
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 2):1308-12. PubMed ID: 15361026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surfing for juvenile idiopathic arthritis: perspectives on quality and content of information on the Internet.
    Stinson JN; Tucker L; Huber A; Harris H; Lin C; Cohen L; Gill N; Lukas-Bretzler J; Proulx L; Prowten D
    J Rheumatol; 2009 Aug; 36(8):1755-62. PubMed ID: 19531749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality of chronic pain websites.
    Washington TA; Fanciullo GJ; Sorensen JA; Baird JC
    Pain Med; 2008 Nov; 9(8):994-1000. PubMed ID: 18346065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of osteoporosis-website quality.
    Lewiecki EM; Rudolph LA; Kiebzak GM; Chavez JR; Thorpe BM
    Osteoporos Int; 2006; 17(5):741-52. PubMed ID: 16447010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.