103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18266586)
1. 3-D telestration: a teaching tool for robotic surgery.
Ali MR; Loggins JP; Fuller WD; Miller BE; Hasser CJ; Yellowlees P; Vidovszky TJ; Rasmussen JJ; Pierce J
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2008 Feb; 18(1):107-12. PubMed ID: 18266586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Beyond 2D telestration: an evaluation of novel proctoring tools for robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery.
Jarc AM; Shah SH; Adebar T; Hwang E; Aron M; Gill IS; Hung AJ
J Robot Surg; 2016 Jun; 10(2):103-9. PubMed ID: 26914650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Augmented reality to the rescue of the minimally invasive surgeon. The usefulness of the interposition of stereoscopic images in the Da Vinci™ robotic console.
Volonté F; Buchs NC; Pugin F; Spaltenstein J; Schiltz B; Jung M; Hagen M; Ratib O; Morel P
Int J Med Robot; 2013 Sep; 9(3):e34-8. PubMed ID: 23239589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robotic total thyroidectomy with modified radical neck dissection via unilateral retroauricular approach.
Byeon HK; Holsinger FC; Tufano RP; Chung HJ; Kim WS; Koh YW; Choi EC
Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Nov; 21(12):3872-5. PubMed ID: 25227305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Telementoring in robotic surgery.
Santomauro M; Reina GA; Stroup SP; L'Esperance JO
Curr Opin Urol; 2013 Mar; 23(2):141-5. PubMed ID: 23357931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The benefits of stereoscopic vision in robotic-assisted performance on bench models.
Munz Y; Moorthy K; Dosis A; Hernandez JD; Bann S; Bello F; Martin S; Darzi A; Rockall T
Surg Endosc; 2004 Apr; 18(4):611-6. PubMed ID: 14752629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robotic arm enhancement to accommodate improved efficiency and decreased resource utilization in complex minimally invasive surgical procedures.
Geis WP; Kim HC; Brennan EJ; McAfee PC; Wang Y
Stud Health Technol Inform; 1996; 29():471-81. PubMed ID: 10172847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Telestration with augmented reality for visual presentation of intraoperative target structures in minimally invasive surgery: a randomized controlled study.
Wild C; Lang F; Gerhäuser AS; Schmidt MW; Kowalewski KF; Petersen J; Kenngott HG; Müller-Stich BP; Nickel F
Surg Endosc; 2022 Oct; 36(10):7453-7461. PubMed ID: 35266048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Telestration with augmented reality improves surgical performance through gaze guidance.
Felinska EA; Fuchs TE; Kogkas A; Chen ZW; Otto B; Kowalewski KF; Petersen J; Müller-Stich BP; Mylonas G; Nickel F
Surg Endosc; 2023 May; 37(5):3557-3566. PubMed ID: 36609924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dual-console robotic surgery compared to laparoscopic surgery with respect to surgical outcomes in a gynecologic oncology fellowship program.
Smith AL; Krivak TC; Scott EM; Rauh-Hain JA; Sukumvanich P; Olawaiye AB; Richard SD
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Sep; 126(3):432-6. PubMed ID: 22613352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Training in minimally invasive lobectomy: thoracoscopic versus robotic approaches.
Ferguson MK; Umanskiy K; Warnes C; Celauro AD; Vigneswaran WT; Prachand VN
Ann Thorac Surg; 2014 Jun; 97(6):1885-92. PubMed ID: 24681034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Augmented environments for the targeting of hepatic lesions during image-guided robotic liver surgery.
Buchs NC; Volonte F; Pugin F; Toso C; Fusaglia M; Gavaghan K; Majno PE; Peterhans M; Weber S; Morel P
J Surg Res; 2013 Oct; 184(2):825-31. PubMed ID: 23684617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic-assisted closure of atrial septal defect under real-time three-dimensional echo guide: in vitro study.
Suematsu Y; Kiaii B; Bainbridge DT; del Nido PJ; Novick RJ
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2007 Oct; 32(4):573-6. PubMed ID: 17702588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of 2D and 3D vision on performance of novice subjects using da Vinci robotic system.
Blavier A; Gaudissart Q; Cadière GB; Nyssen AS
Acta Chir Belg; 2006; 106(6):662-4. PubMed ID: 17290690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotic ocular surgery.
Tsirbas A; Mango C; Dutson E
Br J Ophthalmol; 2007 Jan; 91(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 17020903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Face, content and construct validity of a novel robotic surgery simulator.
Hung AJ; Zehnder P; Patil MB; Cai J; Ng CK; Aron M; Gill IS; Desai MM
J Urol; 2011 Sep; 186(3):1019-24. PubMed ID: 21784469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robust hand tracking for surgical telestration.
Müller LR; Petersen J; Yamlahi A; Wise P; Adler TJ; Seitel A; Kowalewski KF; Müller B; Kenngott H; Nickel F; Maier-Hein L
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2022 Aug; 17(8):1477-1486. PubMed ID: 35624404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of visual feedback on surgical performance using the da Vinci surgical system.
Oleynikov D; Solomon B; Hallbeck S
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2006 Oct; 16(5):503-8. PubMed ID: 17004878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robotic surgical education: a systematic approach to training urology residents to perform robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Rashid HH; Leung YY; Rashid MJ; Oleyourryk G; Valvo JR; Eichel L
Urology; 2006 Jul; 68(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 16844450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Face, content, construct and concurrent validity of dry laboratory exercises for robotic training using a global assessment tool.
Ramos P; Montez J; Tripp A; Ng CK; Gill IS; Hung AJ
BJU Int; 2014 May; 113(5):836-42. PubMed ID: 24224500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
