These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18266628)

  • 1. The mating game: do opposites really attract?
    Gow JL
    Mol Ecol; 2008 Mar; 17(6):1399-400. PubMed ID: 18266628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reproductive success by large, closely related males facilitated by sperm storage in an aggregate breeding amphibian.
    Chandler CH; Zamudio KR
    Mol Ecol; 2008 Mar; 17(6):1564-76. PubMed ID: 18179431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The good-genes and compatible-genes benefits of mate choice.
    Puurtinen M; Ketola T; Kotiaho JS
    Am Nat; 2009 Nov; 174(5):741-52. PubMed ID: 19772439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Female mate-choice drives the evolution of male-biased dispersal in a social mammal.
    Höner OP; Wachter B; East ML; Streich WJ; Wilhelm K; Burke T; Hofer H
    Nature; 2007 Aug; 448(7155):798-801. PubMed ID: 17700698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Complexity and context of MHC-correlated mating preferences in wild populations.
    Roberts SC
    Mol Ecol; 2009 Aug; 18(15):3121-3. PubMed ID: 19682244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bias in studies of heterozygosity and mate choice.
    Slate J
    Mol Ecol; 2009 May; 18(9):1815-7. PubMed ID: 19302362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Condition-dependent mate choice and a reproductive disadvantage for MHC-divergent male tiger salamanders.
    Bos DH; Williams RN; Gopurenko D; Bulut Z; DeWoody JA
    Mol Ecol; 2009 Aug; 18(15):3307-15. PubMed ID: 19508451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evolution of mate choice for genome-wide heterozygosity.
    Fromhage L; Kokko H; Reid JM
    Evolution; 2009 Mar; 63(3):684-94. PubMed ID: 19220455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Outbreeding depression, but no inbreeding depression in haplodiploid Ambrosia beetles with regular sibling mating.
    Peer K; Taborsky M
    Evolution; 2005 Feb; 59(2):317-23. PubMed ID: 15807418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mate choice for nonadditive genetic benefits and the maintenance of genetic diversity in song sparrows.
    Neff BD; Pitcher TE
    J Evol Biol; 2009 Feb; 22(2):424-9. PubMed ID: 19032502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An integrative view of sexual selection in Tribolium flour beetles.
    Fedina TY; Lewis SM
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2008 May; 83(2):151-71. PubMed ID: 18429767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Post-mating sexual selection increases lifetime fitness of polyandrous females in the wild.
    Fisher DO; Double MC; Blomberg SP; Jennions MD; Cockburn A
    Nature; 2006 Nov; 444(7115):89-92. PubMed ID: 17080089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evidence of multiple paternity and mate selection for inbreeding avoidance in wild eastern chipmunks.
    Bergeron P; Réale D; Humphries MM; Garant D
    J Evol Biol; 2011 Aug; 24(8):1685-94. PubMed ID: 21585586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A spatial genetic structure and effects of relatedness on mate choice in a wild bird population.
    Foerster K; Valcu M; Johnsen A; Kempenaers B
    Mol Ecol; 2006 Dec; 15(14):4555-67. PubMed ID: 17107482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can non-directional male mating preferences facilitate honest female ornamentation?
    Chenoweth SF; Doughty P; Kokko H
    Ecol Lett; 2006 Feb; 9(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 16958883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Male mating constraints affect mutual mate choice: prudent male courting and sperm-limited females.
    Härdling R; Gosden T; Aguilée R
    Am Nat; 2008 Aug; 172(2):259-71. PubMed ID: 18588428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Should females prefer to mate with low-quality males?
    Cotar C; McNamara JM; Collins EJ; Houston AI
    J Theor Biol; 2008 Oct; 254(3):561-7. PubMed ID: 18625245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assortative mating for relatedness in a large naturally occurring population of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Robinson SP; Kennington WJ; Simmons LW
    J Evol Biol; 2012 Apr; 25(4):716-25. PubMed ID: 22321157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mate choice for non-additive genetic benefits: a resolution to the lek paradox.
    Neff BD; Pitcher TE
    J Theor Biol; 2008 Sep; 254(1):147-55. PubMed ID: 18589454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Role of familiarity and preference in reproductive success in ex situ breeding programs.
    Martin MS; Shepherdson DJ
    Conserv Biol; 2012 Aug; 26(4):649-56. PubMed ID: 22809353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.