These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18266628)

  • 21. The relative role of male vs. female mate choice in maintaining assortative pairing among discrete colour morphs.
    Pryke SR; Griffith SC
    J Evol Biol; 2007 Jul; 20(4):1512-21. PubMed ID: 17584244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Gentlemen prefer blondes: the evolution of mate preference among strategically allocated males.
    Rowell JT; Servedio MR
    Am Nat; 2009 Jan; 173(1):12-25. PubMed ID: 19063659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Do female hyaenas choose mates based on tenure?
    Van Horn RC; Watts HE; Holekamp KE
    Nature; 2008 Jul; 454(7201):E1; discussion E2. PubMed ID: 18615020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Are old males still good males and can females tell the difference? Do hidden advantages of mating with old males off-set costs related to fertility, or are we missing something else?
    Johnson SL; Gemmell NJ
    Bioessays; 2012 Jul; 34(7):609-19. PubMed ID: 22581618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Influence of genetic dissimilarity in the reproductive success and mate choice of brown trout - females fishing for optimal MHC dissimilarity.
    Forsberg LA; Dannewitz J; Petersson E; Grahn M
    J Evol Biol; 2007 Sep; 20(5):1859-69. PubMed ID: 17714303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of a parasitic nematode on male mate choice in a livebearing fish with a coercive mating system (western mosquitofish, Gambusia affinis).
    Deaton R
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jan; 80(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18765273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The role of marker traits in the assortative mating within red crossbills, Loxia curvirostra complex.
    Snowberg LK; Benkman CW
    J Evol Biol; 2007 Sep; 20(5):1924-32. PubMed ID: 17714309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Male fish deceive competitors about mating preferences.
    Plath M; Richter S; Tiedemann R; Schlupp I
    Curr Biol; 2008 Aug; 18(15):1138-41. PubMed ID: 18674912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Genetic incompatibility drives sex allocation and maternal investment in a polymorphic finch.
    Pryke SR; Griffith SC
    Science; 2009 Mar; 323(5921):1605-7. PubMed ID: 19299618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Females benefit from multiple mating but not multiple mates in the burying beetle Nicrophorus vespilloides.
    House CM; Walling CA; Stamper CE; Moore AJ
    J Evol Biol; 2009 Sep; 22(9):1961-6. PubMed ID: 19682308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Sex differences in mate recognition and conspecific preference in species with mutual mate choice.
    Kozak GM; Reisland M; Boughmann JW
    Evolution; 2009 Feb; 63(2):353-65. PubMed ID: 19154359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Mix and match - hybridization reveals hidden complexity in seal breeding behaviour.
    Amos W
    Mol Ecol; 2007 Aug; 16(15):3066-8. PubMed ID: 17651187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sexual selection in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus: no good genes?
    Rodríguez-Muñoz R; Bretman A; Hadfield JD; Tregenza T
    Genetica; 2008 Mar; 132(3):287-94. PubMed ID: 17647083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Heritable variation in the timing of spermatophore removal, a mechanism of post-copulatory female choice in crickets.
    Mautz BS; Sakaluk SK
    J Evol Biol; 2008 Sep; 21(5):1366-70. PubMed ID: 18544069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assortative mating through a mechanism of sexual selection.
    Castro L; Toro MA
    J Theor Biol; 2006 Dec; 243(3):386-92. PubMed ID: 16928384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Postmating sexual selection favors males that sire offspring with low fitness.
    Bilde T; Foged A; Schilling N; Arnqvist G
    Science; 2009 Jun; 324(5935):1705-6. PubMed ID: 19556506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Direct benefits and costs for hybridizing Ficedula flycatchers.
    Wiley C; Fogelberg N; Saether SA; Veen T; Svedin N; Kehlenbeck JV; Qvarnström A
    J Evol Biol; 2007 May; 20(3):854-64. PubMed ID: 17465896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Active inbreeding in a cichlid fish and its adaptive significance.
    Thünken T; Bakker TC; Baldauf SA; Kullmann H
    Curr Biol; 2007 Feb; 17(3):225-9. PubMed ID: 17276915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Ecological separation in a polymorphic terrestrial salamander.
    Anthony CD; Venesky MD; Hickerson CA
    J Anim Ecol; 2008 Jul; 77(4):646-53. PubMed ID: 18479343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Indirect mate choice, direct mate choice and species recognition in a bower-building cichlid fish lek.
    Genner MJ; Young KA; Haesler MP; Joyce DA
    J Evol Biol; 2008 Sep; 21(5):1387-96. PubMed ID: 18547351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.