229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18266888)
1. A new nonparametric approach for baseline covariate adjustment for two-group comparative studies.
Schacht A; Bogaerts K; Bluhmki E; Lesaffre E
Biometrics; 2008 Dec; 64(4):1110-6. PubMed ID: 18266888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Two new covariate adjustment methods for non-inferiority assessment of binary clinical trials data.
Hou Y; Ding V; Li K; Zhou XH
J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Jan; 21(1):77-93. PubMed ID: 21191856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A note on non-parametric ANCOVA for covariate adjustment in randomized clinical trials.
Lesaffre E; Senn S
Stat Med; 2003 Dec; 22(23):3583-96. PubMed ID: 14652862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nonparametric tests for continuous covariate effects with multistate survival data.
Peng L; Fine JP
Biometrics; 2008 Dec; 64(4):1080-9. PubMed ID: 18266896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The type I error and power of non-parametric logrank and Wilcoxon tests with adjustment for covariates--a simulation study.
Jiang H; Symanowski J; Paul S; Qu Y; Zagar A; Hong S
Stat Med; 2008 Dec; 27(28):5850-60. PubMed ID: 18759373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The appropriateness of the Wilcoxon test in ordinal data.
Hilton JF
Stat Med; 1996 Mar; 15(6):631-45. PubMed ID: 8731005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Randomized controlled trials with time-to-event outcomes: how much does prespecified covariate adjustment increase power?
Hernández AV; Eijkemans MJ; Steyerberg EW
Ann Epidemiol; 2006 Jan; 16(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 16275011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Nonparametric comparison for panel count data with unequal observation processes.
Zhao X; Sun J
Biometrics; 2011 Sep; 67(3):770-9. PubMed ID: 21114659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Semiparametric approaches for joint modeling of longitudinal and survival data with time-varying coefficients.
Song X; Wang CY
Biometrics; 2008 Jun; 64(2):557-66. PubMed ID: 17725812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Nonparametric confidence intervals for Tmax in sequence-stratified crossover studies.
Willavize SA; Morgenthien EA
Pharm Stat; 2008; 7(1):9-19. PubMed ID: 17256803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Covariate adjustment in randomized controlled trials with dichotomous outcomes increases statistical power and reduces sample size requirements.
Hernández AV; Steyerberg EW; Habbema JD
J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 May; 57(5):454-60. PubMed ID: 15196615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sample size calculation for the van Elteren test adjusting for ties.
Zhao YD; Rahardja D; Mei Y
J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(6):1112-9. PubMed ID: 18991111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A note on P-values under group sequential testing and nonproportional hazards.
Gillen DL; Emerson SS
Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):546-51. PubMed ID: 16011703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Empirical likelihood for cumulative hazard ratio estimation with covariate adjustment.
Dong B; Matthews DE
Biometrics; 2012 Jun; 68(2):408-18. PubMed ID: 22059527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Nonparametric covariate adjustment in estimating hazard ratios.
Jiang H; Kulkarni PM; Wang Y; Mallinckrodt CH
Pharm Stat; 2016; 15(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 26610282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modeling and inference for an ordinal effect size measure.
Ryu E; Agresti A
Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(10):1703-17. PubMed ID: 17918752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Balancing continuous and categorical baseline covariates in sequential clinical trials using the area between empirical cumulative distribution functions.
Lin Y; Su Z
Stat Med; 2012 Aug; 31(18):1961-71. PubMed ID: 22532082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Increasing the power of the Mann-Whitney test in randomized experiments through flexible covariate adjustment.
Vermeulen K; Thas O; Vansteelandt S
Stat Med; 2015 Mar; 34(6):1012-30. PubMed ID: 25475954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Applying the law of iterated logarithm to control type I error in cumulative meta-analysis of binary outcomes.
Hu M; Cappelleri JC; Lan KK
Clin Trials; 2007; 4(4):329-40. PubMed ID: 17848494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adaptive covariate adjustment in clinical trials.
Wang SJ; Hung HM
J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(4):605-11. PubMed ID: 16022166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
