116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18267305)
1. A modified T-test feature selection method and its application on the HapMap genotype data.
Zhou N; Wang L
Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics; 2007 Dec; 5(3-4):242-9. PubMed ID: 18267305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effective selection of informative SNPs and classification on the HapMap genotype data.
Zhou N; Wang L
BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Dec; 8():484. PubMed ID: 18093342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The whole genome tagSNP selection and transferability among HapMap populations.
Mägi R; Kaplinski L; Remm M
Pac Symp Biocomput; 2006; ():535-43. PubMed ID: 17094267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. FIFS: A data mining method for informative marker selection in high dimensional population genomic data.
Kavakiotis I; Samaras P; Triantafyllidis A; Vlahavas I
Comput Biol Med; 2017 Nov; 90():146-154. PubMed ID: 28992453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of measures of marker informativeness for ancestry and admixture mapping.
Ding L; Wiener H; Abebe T; Altaye M; Go RC; Kercsmar C; Grabowski G; Martin LJ; Khurana Hershey GK; Chakorborty R; Baye TM
BMC Genomics; 2011 Dec; 12():622. PubMed ID: 22185208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Selection of highly informative SNP markers for population affiliation of major US populations.
Zeng X; Chakraborty R; King JL; LaRue B; Moura-Neto RS; Budowle B
Int J Legal Med; 2016 Mar; 130(2):341-52. PubMed ID: 26645290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. TRES: Identification of Discriminatory and Informative SNPs from Population Genomic Data.
Kavakiotis I; Triantafyllidis A; Ntelidou D; Alexandri P; Megens HJ; Crooijmans RP; Groenen MA; Tsoumakas G; Vlahavas I
J Hered; 2015; 106(5):672-6. PubMed ID: 26137847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of three statistical approaches for feature selection for fine-scale genetic population assignment in four pig breeds.
Hayah I; Ababou M; Botti S; Badaoui B
Trop Anim Health Prod; 2021 Jul; 53(3):395. PubMed ID: 34245361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of aggregators for multi-objective SNP selection.
Gormez Z; Gumus E; Sertbas A; Kursun O
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():3062-5. PubMed ID: 24110374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genetic differences among ethnic groups.
Huang T; Shu Y; Cai YD
BMC Genomics; 2015 Dec; 16():1093. PubMed ID: 26690364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Highly scalable genotype phasing by entropy minimization.
Gusev A; Măndoiu II; Paşaniuc B
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2008; 5(2):252-61. PubMed ID: 18451434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tag SNP selection for candidate gene association studies using HapMap and gene resequencing data.
Xu Z; Kaplan NL; Taylor JA
Eur J Hum Genet; 2007 Oct; 15(10):1063-70. PubMed ID: 17568388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How well do HapMap haplotypes identify common haplotypes of genes? A comparison with haplotypes of 334 genes resequenced in the environmental genome project.
Taylor JA; Xu ZL; Kaplan NL; Morris RW
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2006 Jan; 15(1):133-7. PubMed ID: 16434598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of 96 SNPs in 14 populations for worldwide individual identification.
Zeng Z; Wang L; Feng Q; Zhang L; Lee L; Wang L; Yue Y; Fang Y; Yang W; Qiu H; Dong Z
J Forensic Sci; 2012 Jul; 57(4):1031-5. PubMed ID: 22390235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of genetic similarity on imputation accuracy.
Roshyara NR; Scholz M
BMC Genet; 2015 Jul; 16():90. PubMed ID: 26193934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tag SNP selection in genotype data for maximizing SNP prediction accuracy.
Halperin E; Kimmel G; Shamir R
Bioinformatics; 2005 Jun; 21 Suppl 1():i195-203. PubMed ID: 15961458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Discovery of significant porcine SNPs for swine breed identification by a hybrid of information gain, genetic algorithm, and frequency feature selection technique.
Pasupa K; Rathasamuth W; Tongsima S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 May; 21(1):216. PubMed ID: 32456608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A tool for selecting SNPs for association studies based on observed linkage disequilibrium patterns.
De La Vega FM; Isaac HI; Scafe CR
Pac Symp Biocomput; 2006; ():487-98. PubMed ID: 17094263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of classification methods for predicting Chronic Fatigue Syndrome based on genetic data.
Huang LC; Hsu SY; Lin E
J Transl Med; 2009 Sep; 7():81. PubMed ID: 19772600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficient techniques for genotype-phenotype correlational analysis.
Saha S; Rajasekaran S; Bi J; Pathak S
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2013 Apr; 13():41. PubMed ID: 23557276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
