134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18267311)
1. Experimental methodology for digital breast shape analysis and objective surgical outcome evaluation.
Catanuto G; Spano A; Pennati A; Riggio E; Farinella GM; Impoco G; Spoto S; Gallo G; Nava MB
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2008; 61(3):314-8. PubMed ID: 18267311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative analysis of the reconstructed breast using a 3-dimensional laser light scanner.
Isogai N; Sai K; Kamiishi H; Watatani M; Inui H; Shiozaki H
Ann Plast Surg; 2006 Mar; 56(3):237-42. PubMed ID: 16508350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Virtual 3-dimensional modeling as a valuable adjunct to aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery.
Tepper OM; Small K; Rudolph L; Choi M; Karp N
Am J Surg; 2006 Oct; 192(4):548-51. PubMed ID: 16978973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional laser imaging as a valuable tool for specifying changes in breast shape after augmentation mammaplasty.
Esme DL; Bucksch A; Beekman WH
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2009 Mar; 33(2):191-5. PubMed ID: 18982384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Indications and technical procedures of mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction].
Mazouni C; Pachet C; Rimareix F
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2009 Sep; 37(9):742-8. PubMed ID: 19682937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The use of 3D laser imaging and a new breast replica cast as a method to optimize autologous breast reconstruction after mastectomy.
Ahcan U; Bracun D; Zivec K; Pavlic R; Butala P
Breast; 2012 Apr; 21(2):183-9. PubMed ID: 21982542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pocket work for optimising outcomes in prosthetic breast reconstruction.
Loustau HD; Mayer HF; Sarrabayrouse M
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2009 May; 62(5):626-32. PubMed ID: 18356126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Breast reconstruction. Restoring a natural shape after mastectomy.
Mayo Clin Womens Healthsource; 2009 Jan; 13(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 19043342
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Customized planning of augmentation mammaplasty with silicon implants using three-dimensional optical body scans and biomechanical modeling of soft tissue outcome.
Gladilin E; Gabrielova B; Montemurro P; Hedén P
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2011 Aug; 35(4):494-501. PubMed ID: 21184065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rotation mastopexy: an anatomical approach.
Corduff N; Taylor GI
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2009 May; 33(3):377-85; discussion 386-7. PubMed ID: 19437074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nipple areola reconstruction.
Vendemia N; Mesbahi AN; McCarthy CM; Disa JJ
Cancer J; 2008; 14(4):253-7. PubMed ID: 18677134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Magnetic resonance tomography in the diagnostics of breast implants: a survey].
Hauth EA; Hoffmann O; Zadow-Eulerich T; Kimmig R; Forsting M
Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 2008; 48(2):76-83. PubMed ID: 18431047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Aesthetic remodeling of the healthy breast in breast reconstruction using expanders and implants.
Mayo F; Vecino MG
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2009 Mar; 33(2):220-7. PubMed ID: 19156459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Partial reconstruction after conservative treatment for breast cancer: classification of sequelae and treatment options].
Clough KB; Nos C; Fitoussi A; Couturaud B; Inguenault C; Sarfati I
Ann Chir Plast Esthet; 2008 Apr; 53(2):88-101. PubMed ID: 18387726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cosmetic outcome and patient satisfaction after skin-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer with immediate reconstruction of the breast.
Ueda S; Tamaki Y; Yano K; Okishiro N; Yanagisawa T; Imasato M; Shimazu K; Kim SJ; Miyoshi Y; Tanji Y; Taguchi T; Noguchi S
Surgery; 2008 Mar; 143(3):414-25. PubMed ID: 18291263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Re: Virtual 3-dimensional modeling as a valuable adjunct to aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery.
Eder M; Papadopulos NA; Kovacs L
Am J Surg; 2007 Oct; 194(4):563-5; author reply 565-6. PubMed ID: 17826081
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. 3D analysis of breast augmentation defines operative changes and their relationship to implant dimensions.
Tepper OM; Small KH; Unger JG; Feldman DL; Kumar N; Choi M; Karp NS
Ann Plast Surg; 2009 May; 62(5):570-5. PubMed ID: 19387164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: evaluation of patient satisfaction, aesthetic results, and sensation.
Yueh JH; Houlihan MJ; Slavin SA; Lee BT; Pories SE; Morris DJ
Ann Plast Surg; 2009 May; 62(5):586-90. PubMed ID: 19387167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast asymmetry: a new vision of this malformation.
Onesti MG; Mezzana P; Martano A; Scuderi N
Acta Chir Plast; 2004; 46(1):8-11. PubMed ID: 15274471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is breast reduction a functional or a cosmetic operation? Proposal of an objective discriminating criterion.
Nicoletti G; Scevola S; Faga A
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2009 Dec; 62(12):1644-6. PubMed ID: 19010749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
