291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18268415)
1. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the definition of threshold levels to diagnose coronary artery disease on electrocardiographic stress testing. Part II: the use of ROC curves in the choice of electrocardiographic stress test markers of ischaemia.
Marazìa S; Barnabei L; De Caterina R
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2008 Jan; 9(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 18268415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the definition of threshold levels to diagnose coronary artery disease on electrocardiographic stress testing. Part I: The use of ROC curves in diagnostic medicine and electrocardiographic markers of ischaemia.
Barnabei L; Marazìa S; De Caterina R
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2007 Nov; 8(11):873-81. PubMed ID: 17906471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Exercise electrocardiography for diagnosis of coronary artery disease: impact of sampling rate on the diagnostic performance of ST/HR-loop based on data from early recovery phase.
Kronander H; Fischer-Colbrie W; Nowak J; Brodin LA; Elmqvist H
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2008 Mar; 28(2):96-100. PubMed ID: 18005163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A new parametric method based on S-distributions for computing receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
Sorribas A; March J; Trujillano J
Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1213-35. PubMed ID: 12111875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The cotton swab test. Receiver-operating characteristic curves.
Fedorkow DM; Sand PK; Retzky SS; Johnson DC
J Reprod Med; 1995 Jan; 40(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 7722975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Heart rate variability derived from exercise ECG in the detection of coronary artery disease.
Virtanen M; Kähönen M; Nieminen T; Karjalainen P; Tarvainen M; Lehtimäki T; Lehtinen R; Nikus K; Kööbi T; Niemi M; Niemelä K; Turjanmaa V; Malmivuo J; Viik J
Physiol Meas; 2007 Oct; 28(10):1189-200. PubMed ID: 17906387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Cycle ergometer stress testing for identification of significant coronary artery disease: improved accuracy by the use of chronotropic reserve adjustment of ST-segment depression].
Palmieri V; Pezzullo S; Arezzi E; Russo C; Martino S; D'Andrea C; Cassese S; Celentano A
G Ital Cardiol (Rome); 2008 Sep; 9(9):627-36. PubMed ID: 18783083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A principled approach to setting optimal diagnostic thresholds: where ROC and indifference curves meet.
Irwin RJ; Irwin TC
Eur J Intern Med; 2011 Jun; 22(3):230-4. PubMed ID: 21570638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Diagnostic accuracy of exercise testing for diagnosis of coronary artery disease: the need for a critical review].
Vallebona A; Gigli G
Ital Heart J Suppl; 2000 Jul; 1(7):897-904. PubMed ID: 10935734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of correlated receiver operating characteristic curves derived from repeated diagnostic test data.
Zou KH
Acad Radiol; 2001 Mar; 8(3):225-33. PubMed ID: 11249086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Receiver operating characteristic analysis: a tool for the quantitative evaluation of observer performance and imaging systems.
Metz CE
J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Jun; 3(6):413-22. PubMed ID: 17412096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adjusting the generalized ROC curve for covariates.
Schisterman EF; Faraggi D; Reiser B
Stat Med; 2004 Nov; 23(21):3319-31. PubMed ID: 15490426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Apolipoproteins and lipids in coronary artery disease. Analysis of diagnostic accuracy using receiver operating characteristic plots and areas.
Zweig MH
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1994 Feb; 118(2):141-4. PubMed ID: 8311652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [The application of medical decision making to the mass screening: the basic principles on ROC analysis].
Tsji I
Rinsho Byori; 1990 May; 38(5):597-600. PubMed ID: 2199711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Receiver operating characteristic analysis and the cost--benefit analysis in determination of the optimal cut-off point].
Vránová J; Horák J; Krátká K; Hendrichová M; Kovaírková K
Cas Lek Cesk; 2009; 148(9):410-5. PubMed ID: 19899729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A permutation test sensitive to differences in areas for comparing ROC curves from a paired design.
Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Gur D
Stat Med; 2005 Sep; 24(18):2873-93. PubMed ID: 16134144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Diagnostic performance of immunologic tests in amebic liver abscess using receiver operating characteristic curves].
Garduño-Espinosa J; Martínez-García MC; Rendón-Macías E; Fajardo-Gutiérrez A; Hernández-Hernández DM; Muñoz-Hernández O
Rev Invest Clin; 1992; 44(3):373-82. PubMed ID: 1488581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Three approaches to regression analysis of receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous test results.
Pepe MS
Biometrics; 1998 Mar; 54(1):124-35. PubMed ID: 9544511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cardiopulmonary exercise test evidence of isolated right coronary artery disease.
Contini M; Andreini D; Agostoni P
Int J Cardiol; 2006 Nov; 113(2):281-2. PubMed ID: 16316693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic tests: a statistical review.
Schulzer M
Muscle Nerve; 1994 Jul; 17(7):815-9. PubMed ID: 8008012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
