These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1826914)

  • 1. Glass-ceramic inserts anticipated for 'megafilled' composite restorations. Research moves into the office.
    Bowen RL; Eichmiller FC; Marjenhoff WA
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1991 Mar; 122(3):71, 73, 75. PubMed ID: 1826914
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fatigue load of teeth restored with bonded direct composite and indirect ceramic inlays in MOD class II cavity preparations.
    Shor A; Nicholls JI; Phillips KM; Libman WJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 12675458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays compared to composite restorations.
    Lange RT; Pfeiffer P
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(3):263-72. PubMed ID: 19544814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro marginal leakage around Class II resin composite restorations with glass-ceramic inserts.
    Coli P; Derhami K; Brännström M
    Quintessence Int; 1997 Nov; 28(11):755-60. PubMed ID: 9573868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A ceramic "sandwich" technique.
    DeFelice R
    Gen Dent; 1990; 38(5):370-3. PubMed ID: 2088943
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modern alternatives to amalgam: cementable restorations and inlays.
    Wirz J; Jaeger K
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Aug; 30(8):551-6. PubMed ID: 10635268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Combining bonded and cemented restorations: a multitechnique case study.
    Shannon A
    Dent Today; 2000 Apr; 19(4):54, 56, 58-61; quiz 61, 151. PubMed ID: 19750729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A long-term clinical evaluation of class IV acid-etched composite resin restorations.
    Dogon IL; Nathanson D; Van Leeuwen MJ
    Compend Contin Educ Dent (Lawrenceville); 1980; 1(6):385-90. PubMed ID: 6461471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Composite resin restorations: "in vitro" evaluation of three dentin adhesive systems].
    Toca E; Bonfil JJ; Pignoly C
    Inf Dent; 1991 Jun; 73(23):1865-73. PubMed ID: 1830292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Marginal seal comparisons between resin-bonded Class II porcelain inlays, posterior composite restorations, and direct composite resin inlays.
    Shortall AC; Baylis RL; Baylis MA; Grundy JR
    Int J Prosthodont; 1989; 2(3):217-23. PubMed ID: 2699418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Repairing porcelain restorations intraorally: techniques and materials.
    Zhukovsky L; Godder B; Settembrini L; Scherer W
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1996 Jan; 17(1):18, 20, 22 passim; quiz 30. PubMed ID: 8598028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of cavity design and restorative material on the fracture resistance of maxillary premolars.
    Cubas GB; Camacho GB; Pereira-Cenci T; Nonaka T; Barbin EL
    Gen Dent; 2010; 58(2):e84-8. PubMed ID: 20236909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Proximal direct composite restorations and chairside CAD/CAM inlays: marginal adaptation of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel conditioning.
    Bortolotto T; Onisor I; Krejci I
    Clin Oral Investig; 2007 Mar; 11(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 17031673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Effects of dentin bonding agents on the proximal margins of ceramic inlays].
    Kostka EC; Noack MJ; Blunck U; Roulet JF
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1991 Sep; 46(9):615-7. PubMed ID: 1817944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro evaluation of push-out bond strength of direct ceramic inlays to tooth surface with fiber-reinforced composite at the interface.
    Cekic I; Ergun G; Uctasli S; Lassila LV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):271-8. PubMed ID: 17547945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with indirect composite resins: the effect of alternative luting procedures.
    Burke FJ; Wilson NH; Watts DC
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Apr; 25(4):269-75. PubMed ID: 8058900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conservative restoration of posterior teeth: an introspective.
    Lowe RA
    Dent Today; 2001 Jan; 20(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 12524886
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Management of extensive carious lesions in permanent molars of a child with nonmetallic bonded restorations--a case report.
    el-Mowafy O
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2000 Jun; 66(6):302-7. PubMed ID: 10927895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Repair of ceramic materials--is the bond strength of composite repair systems sufficient?].
    Marx R; Stoss T; Herrmann M
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1991 Mar; 46(3):194-6. PubMed ID: 1839979
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.