761 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18269999)
1. Investigation of optimum electrode locations by using an automatized surface electromyography analysis technique.
Nishihara K; Kawai H; Gomi T; Terajima M; Chiba Y
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Feb; 55(2 Pt 1):636-42. PubMed ID: 18269999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effects of interelectrode distance on electromyographic amplitude and mean power frequency during isokinetic and isometric muscle actions of the biceps brachii.
Beck TW; Housh TJ; Johnson GO; Weir JP; Cramer JT; Coburn JW; Malek MH
J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2005 Oct; 15(5):482-95. PubMed ID: 15935960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A novel approach for estimating muscle fiber conduction velocity by spatial and temporal filtering of surface EMG signals.
Farina D; Merletti R
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Dec; 50(12):1340-51. PubMed ID: 14656063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Innervation zones of the upper and lower limb muscles estimated by using multichannel surface EMG.
Saitou K; Masuda T; Michikami D; Kojima R; Okada M
J Hum Ergol (Tokyo); 2000 Dec; 29(1-2):35-52. PubMed ID: 12696320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Experimental analysis of accuracy in the identification of motor unit spike trains from high-density surface EMG.
Holobar A; Minetto MA; Botter A; Negro F; Farina D
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2010 Jun; 18(3):221-9. PubMed ID: 20144921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Automated decomposition of intramuscular electromyographic signals.
Florestal JR; Mathieu PA; Malanda A
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 May; 53(5):832-9. PubMed ID: 16686405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability of measurement of muscle fiber conduction velocity using surface EMG.
Harba MI; Teng LY
Front Med Biol Eng; 1999; 9(1):31-47. PubMed ID: 10354908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An evaluation of the utility and limitations of counting motor unit action potentials in the surface electromyogram.
Zhou P; Rymer WZ
J Neural Eng; 2004 Dec; 1(4):238-45. PubMed ID: 15876644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Selectivity of spatial filters for surface EMG detection from the tibialis anterior muscle.
Farina D; Arendt-Nielsen L; Merletti R; Indino B; Graven-Nielsen T
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Mar; 50(3):354-64. PubMed ID: 12669992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Repeatability of surface EMG parameters at various isometric contraction levels and during fatigue using bipolar and Laplacian electrode configurations.
Ollivier K; Portero P; Maïsetti O; Hogrel JY
J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2005 Oct; 15(5):466-73. PubMed ID: 15935958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Surface EMG: the issue of electrode location.
Mesin L; Merletti R; Rainoldi A
J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2009 Oct; 19(5):719-26. PubMed ID: 18829347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Less is more: high pass filtering, to remove up to 99% of the surface EMG signal power, improves EMG-based biceps brachii muscle force estimates.
Potvin JR; Brown SH
J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2004 Jun; 14(3):389-99. PubMed ID: 15094152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effects of parallel versus perpendicular electrode orientations on EMG amplitude and mean power frequency from the biceps brachii.
Zuniga J; Housh TJ; Camic CL; Hendrix CR; Mielke M; Schmidt RJ; Johnson GO
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Mar; 50(2):87-96. PubMed ID: 20405784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automatic segmentation of surface EMG images: Improving the estimation of neuromuscular activity.
Vieira TM; Merletti R; Mesin L
J Biomech; 2010 Aug; 43(11):2149-58. PubMed ID: 20444452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Identification of isometric contractions based on High Density EMG maps.
Rojas-Martínez M; Mañanas MA; Alonso JF; Merletti R
J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2013 Feb; 23(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 22819519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fatigue analysis of the surface EMG signal in isometric constant force contractions using the averaged instantaneous frequency.
Georgakis A; Stergioulas LK; Giakas G
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Feb; 50(2):262-5. PubMed ID: 12665043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Noninvasive estimation of muscle fiber conduction velocity distribution using an electromyographic processing technique.
Nishihara K; Chiba Y; Moriyama H; Hosoda M; Suzuki Y; Gomi T
Med Sci Monit; 2009 Sep; 15(9):MT113-20. PubMed ID: 19721406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Blind separation of linear instantaneous mixtures of nonstationary surface myoelectric signals.
Farina D; Févotte C; Doncarli C; Merletti R
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Sep; 51(9):1555-67. PubMed ID: 15376504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improving EMG-based muscle force estimation by using a high-density EMG grid and principal component analysis.
Staudenmann D; Kingma I; Daffertshofer A; Stegeman DF; van Dieën JH
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Apr; 53(4):712-9. PubMed ID: 16602578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The cross-correlation and phase-difference methods are not equivalent under noninvasive estimation of the motor unit propagation velocity.
Arabadzhiev TI; Dimitrov GV; Dimitrova NA
J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2004 Jun; 14(3):295-305. PubMed ID: 15094143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
