These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18270295)

  • 1. Trends in compressed breast thickness and radiation dose in breast screening mammography.
    Robinson M; Kotre CJ
    Br J Radiol; 2008 Mar; 81(963):214-8. PubMed ID: 18270295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Determination of average glandular dose with modern mammography units for two large groups of patients.
    Klein R; Aichinger H; Dierker J; Jansen JT; Joite-Barfuss S; Säbel M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Zoetelief J
    Phys Med Biol; 1997 Apr; 42(4):651-71. PubMed ID: 9127443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of fixed and variable kVp technique protocols for film-screen mammography.
    McParland BJ; Boyd MM
    Br J Radiol; 2000 Jun; 73(870):613-26. PubMed ID: 10911785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Glandularity and mean glandular dose determined for individual women at four regional breast cancer screening units in the Netherlands.
    Zoetelief J; Veldkamp WJ; Thijssen MA; Jansen JT
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Apr; 51(7):1807-17. PubMed ID: 16552106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Breast thickness in routine mammograms: effect on image quality and radiation dose.
    Helvie MA; Chan HP; Adler DD; Boyd PG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Dec; 163(6):1371-4. PubMed ID: 7992731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of mean glandular dose in mammography.
    Faulkner K; Law J; Robson KJ
    Br J Radiol; 1995 Aug; 68(812):877-81. PubMed ID: 7551786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do women with dense breasts have higher radiation dose during screening mammography?
    Nguyen JV; Williams MB; Patrie JT; Harvey JA
    Breast J; 2018 Jan; 24(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 28590576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A pilot survey of radiation doses received in the United Kingdom Breast Screening Programme.
    Burch A; Goodman DA
    Br J Radiol; 1998 May; 71(845):517-27. PubMed ID: 9691897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diagnostic reference levels for digital mammography in New South Wales.
    Suleiman ME; McEntee MF; Cartwright L; Diffey J; Brennan PC
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2017 Feb; 61(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 27714925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prediction of glandularity and breast radiation dose from mammography results in Japanese women.
    Yamamuro M; Asai Y; Yamada K; Ozaki Y; Matsumoto M; Murakami T
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2019 Jan; 57(1):289-298. PubMed ID: 30099671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dosimetric evaluation of the mean glandular dose for mammography in Korean women: a preliminary report.
    Oh KK; Hur J; Kim EK; Choo SS
    Yonsei Med J; 2003 Oct; 44(5):863-8. PubMed ID: 14584104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiation doses received in the UK Breast Screening Programme in 1997 and 1998.
    Young KC; Burch A
    Br J Radiol; 2000 Mar; 73(867):278-87. PubMed ID: 10817044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Average glandular dose with amorphous silicon full-field digital mammography - Clinical results.
    Hermann KP; Obenauer S; Marten K; Kehbel S; Fischer U; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 2002 Jun; 174(6):696-9. PubMed ID: 12063597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigation of breast dose in five screening mammography centres in Greece.
    Tsapaki V; Tsalafoutas IA; Poga V; Louizi A; Kottou S; Koulentianos E
    J Radiol Prot; 2008 Sep; 28(3):337-46. PubMed ID: 18714130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adverse effects of increased body weight on quantitative measures of mammographic image quality.
    Guest AR; Helvie MA; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Bailey JE; Roubidoux MA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Sep; 175(3):805-10. PubMed ID: 10954471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Survey of doses in screening mammography.
    Heggie JC
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1996 Dec; 19(4):207-16. PubMed ID: 9060207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A method for estimating compressed breast thickness during mammography.
    Burch A; Law J
    Br J Radiol; 1995 Apr; 68(808):394-9. PubMed ID: 7795976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Radiation exposure in full-field digital mammography with a selenium flat-panel detector].
    Gosch D; Jendrass S; Scholz M; Kahn T
    Rofo; 2006 Jul; 178(7):693-7. PubMed ID: 16761214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dose and image quality in mammography with an automatic beam quality system.
    Young KC; Ramsdale ML; Rust A
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Jun; 69(822):555-62. PubMed ID: 8757659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimation of compressed breast thickness during mammography.
    Highnam RP; Brady JM; Shepstone BJ
    Br J Radiol; 1998 Jun; 71(846):646-53. PubMed ID: 9849389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.