These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1827132)
21. Bond strength of prosthodontic luting materials to titanium after localized cyclic loading. Taira Y; Suzuki S; Givan DA; Lacefield W; Atsuta M Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):251-4. PubMed ID: 11764111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The effect of adhesive luting agent-dentinal surface interactions on film thickness. White SN; Yu Z J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Jul; 68(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 1403918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The influence of different cements on the pull-out bond strength of fiber posts. Pereira JR; da Rosa RA; do Valle AL; Ghizoni JS; Só MV; Shiratori FK J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jul; 112(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 24423461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effect of light-emitting diode (LED) curing modes on resin/dentin bond strength. Fahmy N; Naguib H; Guindy JE J Prosthodont; 2009 Dec; 18(8):670-5. PubMed ID: 19682222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effects of curing mode and moisture on nanoindentation mechanical properties and bonding of a self-adhesive resin cement to pulp chamber floor. Moosavi H; Hariri I; Sadr A; Thitthaweerat S; Tagami J Dent Mater; 2013 Jun; 29(6):708-17. PubMed ID: 23608759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effects of conventional and high-intensity light-curing on enamel shear bond strength of composite resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer. Sfondrini MF; Cacciafesta V; Pistorio A; Sfondrini G Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jan; 119(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 11174537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The effect of local interfacial geometry on the measurement of the tensile bond strength to dentin. Van Noort R; Cardew GE; Howard IC; Noroozi S J Dent Res; 1991 May; 70(5):889-93. PubMed ID: 1827133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Bonding potential of self-adhesive luting agents used at different temperatures to lute composite onlays. Cantoro A; Goracci C; Carvalho CA; Coniglio I; Ferrari M J Dent; 2009 Jun; 37(6):454-61. PubMed ID: 19339100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Tensile strength of thin resin composite layers as a function of layer thickness. Alster D; Feilzer AJ; De Gee AJ; Davidson CL J Dent Res; 1995 Nov; 74(11):1745-8. PubMed ID: 8530735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Bond strength of newer dentin bonding agents in different clinical situations. Hegde MN; Manjunath J Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 21777099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Microtensile bond strength of new self-adhesive luting agents and conventional multistep systems. Viotti RG; Kasaz A; Pena CE; Alexandre RS; Arrais CA; Reis AF J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Nov; 102(5):306-12. PubMed ID: 19853172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Acoustic emission analysis of tooth-composite interfacial debonding. Cho NY; Ferracane JL; Lee IB J Dent Res; 2013 Jan; 92(1):76-81. PubMed ID: 23100273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Dentin and enamel bond strengths of dual-cure composite luting agents used with dual-cure dental adhesives. Ritter AV; Ghaname E; Pimenta LA J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 18926614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Stresses generated by luting resins during cementation of composite and ceramic inlays. Rees JS; Jacobsen PH J Oral Rehabil; 1992 Mar; 19(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 1517872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effect of resin-modified glass-ionomer cement lining and composite layering technique on the adhesive interface of lateral wall. Azevedo LM; Casas-Apayco LC; Villavicencio Espinoza CA; Wang L; Navarro MF; Atta MT J Appl Oral Sci; 2015; 23(3):315-20. PubMed ID: 26221927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effect of cavity configuration and aging on the bonding effectiveness of six adhesives to dentin. Shirai K; De Munck J; Yoshida Y; Inoue S; Lambrechts P; Suzuki K; Shintani H; Van Meerbeek B Dent Mater; 2005 Feb; 21(2):110-24. PubMed ID: 15681009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A clinical evaluation of adhesively luted ceramic inlays. A two year follow-up study. Höglund C; van Dijken J; Olofsson AL Swed Dent J; 1992; 16(4):169-71. PubMed ID: 1455328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Curing mode affects bond strength of adhesively luted composite CAD/CAM restorations to dentin. Lührs AK; Pongprueksa P; De Munck J; Geurtsen W; Van Meerbeek B Dent Mater; 2014 Mar; 30(3):281-91. PubMed ID: 24424092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The morphology and stability of resin-modified glass-ionomer adhesive at the dentin/resin-based composite interface. Sidhu SK; Pilecki P; Cheng PC; Watson TF Am J Dent; 2002 Apr; 15(2):129-36. PubMed ID: 12092991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]