BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

877 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18271368)

  • 1. A classification system to measure the implant-abutment microgap.
    Kano SC; Binon PP; Curtis DA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):879-85. PubMed ID: 18271368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of casting procedures on rotational misfit in castable abutments.
    Kano SC; Binon PP; Bonfante G; Curtis DA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):575-9. PubMed ID: 17929518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measurement of the rotational misfit and implant-abutment gap of all-ceramic abutments.
    Garine WN; Funkenbusch PD; Ercoli C; Wodenscheck J; Murphy WC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):928-38. PubMed ID: 18271374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro vertical misfit evaluation of cast frameworks for cement-retained implant-supported partial prostheses.
    Oyagüe RC; Turrión AS; Toledano M; Monticelli F; Osorio R
    J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 18951675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of eliminating implant/abutment rotational misfit on screw joint stability.
    Binon PP; McHugh MJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(6):511-9. PubMed ID: 9171488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of casting procedures on screw loosening in UCLA-type abutments.
    Kano SC; Binon P; Bonfante G; Curtis DA
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 16650006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A 16-year study of the microgap between 272 human titanium implants and their abutments.
    Scarano A; Assenza B; Piattelli M; Iezzi G; Leghissa GC; Quaranta A; Tortora P; Piattelli A
    J Oral Implantol; 2005; 31(6):269-75. PubMed ID: 16447899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The implant-abutment interface of alumina and zirconia abutments.
    Yüzügüllü B; Avci M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 May; 10(2):113-21. PubMed ID: 18218054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of gold-machined UCLA-type abutments and CAD/CAM titanium abutments with hexagonal external connection and with internal connection.
    Vigolo P; Fonzi F; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):247-52. PubMed ID: 18548920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An in vitro load evaluation of a conical implant system with 2 abutment designs and 3 different retaining-screw alloys.
    Erneklint C; Odman P; Ortengren U; Karlsson S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):733-7. PubMed ID: 17066634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of implant/abutment hexagonal misfit on screw joint stability.
    Binon PP
    Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(2):149-60. PubMed ID: 8639238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bacterial leakage along the implant-abutment interface of premachined or cast components.
    do Nascimento C; Barbosa RE; Issa JP; Watanabe E; Ito IY; Albuquerque RF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Feb; 37(2):177-80. PubMed ID: 17931833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of the misfit of dental implant-supported prostheses made with three manufacturing processes.
    Fernández M; Delgado L; Molmeneu M; García D; Rodríguez D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Feb; 111(2):116-23. PubMed ID: 24176182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro evaluation of reverse torque value of abutment screw and marginal opening in a screw- and cement-retained implant fixed partial denture design.
    Kim SG; Park JU; Jeong JH; Bae C; Bae TS; Chee W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1061-7. PubMed ID: 20162110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scanning electron microscope evaluation of vertical and horizontal discrepancy in cast copings for single-tooth implant-supported prostheses.
    Siadat H; Alikhasi M; Mirfazaelian A; Zade MM
    Implant Dent; 2008 Sep; 17(3):299-308. PubMed ID: 18784530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of a new method to achieve optimal passivity of implant-supported superstructures.
    Goossens IC; Herbst D
    SADJ; 2003 Aug; 58(7):279-85, 287. PubMed ID: 14649041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Vertical Misfit of Single-Implant Abutments Made from Different Materials Under Cyclic Loading.
    Butignon LE; de Almeida Basílio M; Santo JS; Arioli Filho JN
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(5):1017-22. PubMed ID: 27632255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of repeated torque in small diameter implants with machined and premachined abutments.
    Saboury A; Neshandar Asli H; Vaziri S
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e224-30. PubMed ID: 22376004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measurement of the dimensions and abutment rotational freedom of gold-machined 3i UCLA-type abutments in the as-received condition, after casting with a noble metal alloy and porcelain firing.
    Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Nov; 84(5):548-53. PubMed ID: 11105010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization to evaluate the internal contamination of dental implants and comparison of bacterial leakage with cast or pre-machined abutments.
    do Nascimento C; Barbosa RE; Issa JP; Watanabe E; Ito IY; de Albuquerque Junior RF
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jun; 20(6):571-7. PubMed ID: 19250244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 44.