These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

353 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18271373)

  • 1. Retention of zirconia ceramic copings bonded to titanium abutments.
    Ebert A; Hedderich J; Kern M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):921-7. PubMed ID: 18271373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement.
    Palacios RP; Johnson GH; Phillips KM; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):104-14. PubMed ID: 16911887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retention of zirconia on titanium in two-piece abutments with self-adhesive resin cements.
    Mehl C; Zhang Q; Lehmann F; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):214-219. PubMed ID: 29627210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Durability of the resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic after using different surface conditioning methods.
    Wolfart M; Lehmann F; Wolfart S; Kern M
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 16427692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retentive strength of two-piece CAD/CAM zirconia implant abutments.
    Gehrke P; Alius J; Fischer C; Erdelt KJ; Beuer F
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2014 Dec; 16(6):920-5. PubMed ID: 23527950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An in vitro evaluation of the long-term resin bond to a new densely sintered high-purity zirconium-oxide ceramic surface.
    Phark JH; Duarte S; Blatz M; Sadan A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jan; 101(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 19105989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns.
    Kim Y; Yamashita J; Shotwell JL; Chong KH; Wang HL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 16765158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of reduced airborne-particle abrasion pressure on the retention of zirconia copings resin bonded to titanium abutments.
    Hansen NA; Wille S; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jul; 124(1):60-67. PubMed ID: 31703916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of internal-gap width and cement type on the retentive force of zirconia copings in pullout testing.
    Son YH; Han CH; Kim S
    J Dent; 2012 Oct; 40(10):866-72. PubMed ID: 22819954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retention of zirconia copings on zirconia implant abutments cemented with provisional luting agents.
    Kokubo Y; Kano T; Tsumita M; Sakurai S; Itayama A; Fukushima S
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Jan; 37(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 19849775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of surface treatment on the retention of implant-supported zirconia restorations over short abutments.
    Nejatidanesh F; Savabi O; Jabbari E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jul; 112(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 24388717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bond strength of luting materials to ceramic crowns after different surface treatments.
    Derand T; Molin M; Kleven E; Haag P; Karlsson S
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2008 Mar; 16(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 18468323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of different surface treatments on the short-term bond strength and durability between a zirconia post and a composite resin core material.
    Akgungor G; Sen D; Aydin M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 May; 99(5):388-99. PubMed ID: 18456050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Panavia F 2.0 bonding to contaminated zirconia ceramic after different cleaning procedures.
    Quaas AC; Yang B; Kern M
    Dent Mater; 2007 Apr; 23(4):506-12. PubMed ID: 16893563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retention Forces between Titanium and Zirconia Components of Two-Part Implant Abutments with Different Techniques of Surface Modification.
    von Maltzahn NF; Holstermann J; Kohorst P
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2016 Aug; 18(4):735-44. PubMed ID: 25916969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retention of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns on prefabricated implant abutments: an in vitro comparative study of luting agents and abutment surface area.
    Carnaggio TV; Conrad R; Engelmeier RL; Gerngross P; Paravina R; Perezous L; Powers JM
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Oct; 21(7):523-8. PubMed ID: 22469271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fatigue resistance and failure mode of adhesively restored custom implant zirconia abutments.
    Oderich E; Boff LL; Cardoso AC; Magne P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Dec; 23(12):1360-8. PubMed ID: 22117899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of different convergence angles and resin cements on the retention of zirconia copings.
    Ali AO; Kelly JR; Zandparsa R
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Dec; 21(8):614-21. PubMed ID: 22823334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of air-abrasion on the retention of zirconia ceramic crowns luted with different cements before and after artificial aging.
    Shahin R; Kern M
    Dent Mater; 2010 Sep; 26(9):922-8. PubMed ID: 20655101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surface conditioning influences zirconia ceramic bonding.
    Kern M; Barloi A; Yang B
    J Dent Res; 2009 Sep; 88(9):817-22. PubMed ID: 19767578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.