These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18271376)

  • 21. Histomorphometric evaluation of implant design as a key factor in peri-implant bone response: a preliminary study in a dog model.
    Orsini E; Salgarello S; Bubalo M; Lazic Z; Trire A; Martini D; Franchi M; Ruggeri A
    Minerva Stomatol; 2009 Jun; 58(6):263-75. PubMed ID: 19516235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Influence of two different machined-collar heights on crestal bone loss.
    Herrero-Climent M; Romero Ruiz MM; Díaz-Castro CM; Bullón P; Ríos-Santos JV
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(6):1374-9. PubMed ID: 25397800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Heterotopic bone formation around sintered porous-surfaced Ti-6Al-4V implants coated with native bone morphogenetic proteins.
    Simon Z; Deporter DA; Pilliar RM; Clokie CM
    Implant Dent; 2006 Sep; 15(3):265-74. PubMed ID: 16966900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Immediately loaded titanium implant with a tissue-stabilizing/maintaining design ('beyond platform switch') retrieved from man after 4 weeks: a histological and histomorphometrical evaluation. A case report.
    Degidi M; Iezzi G; Scarano A; Piattelli A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Mar; 19(3):276-82. PubMed ID: 18081870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A prospective clinical study in humans of an endosseous dental implant partially covered with a powder-sintered porous coating: 3- to 4-year results.
    Deporter DA; Watson PA; Pilliar RM; Pharoah M; Smith DC; Chipman M; Locker D; Rydall A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(1):87-95. PubMed ID: 8820127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Surface treatment at the cervical region and its effect on bone maintenance after immediate implantation: an experimental study in dogs.
    Coelho PG; Marin C; Granato R; Bonfante EA; Lima CP; Suzuki M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Aug; 110(2):182-7. PubMed ID: 20418125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Bone changes around early loaded chemically modified sandblasted and acid-etched surfaced implants with and without a machined collar: a radiographic and resonance frequency analysis in the canine mandible.
    Valderrama P; Jones AA; Wilson TG; Higginbottom F; Schoolfield JD; Jung RE; Noujeim M; Cochran DL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):548-57. PubMed ID: 20556254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Endopore implant-enhanced osseointegration with a sintered porous-surfaced design.
    Pilliar RM; Deporter DA; Watson PA; Todescan R
    Oral Health; 1998 Jul; 88(7):61-4. PubMed ID: 9760931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Immediate implant placement into fresh extraction sites with chronic periapical pathologic features combined with plasma rich in growth factors: preliminary results of single-cohort study.
    Del Fabbro M; Boggian C; Taschieri S
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Nov; 67(11):2476-84. PubMed ID: 19837321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Modeling of the buccal and lingual bone walls of fresh extraction sites following implant installation.
    Araújo MG; Wennström JL; Lindhe J
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Dec; 17(6):606-14. PubMed ID: 17092217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effects of laser microtextured collars upon crestal bone levels of dental implants.
    Weiner S; Simon J; Ehrenberg DS; Zweig B; Ricci JL
    Implant Dent; 2008 Jun; 17(2):217-28. PubMed ID: 18545054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. AICRG, Part II: Crestal bone loss associated with the Ankylos implant: loading to 36 months.
    Chou CT; Morris HF; Ochi S; Walker L; DesRosiers D
    J Oral Implantol; 2004; 30(3):134-43. PubMed ID: 15255390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of implant geometry and surface treatment on osseointegration after functional loading: a dog study.
    Chung SH; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim SK; Lee JB; Han JS; Han CH; Rhyu IC; Lee SJ
    J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Mar; 35(3):229-36. PubMed ID: 18254802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Marginal bone stability using 3 different flap approaches for alveolar split expansion for dental implants: a 1-year clinical study.
    Jensen OT; Cullum DR; Baer D
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 67(9):1921-30. PubMed ID: 19686930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Immediate occlusal loading of implants in the partially edentate mandible: a prospective 1-year radiographic and 4-year clinical study.
    Ostman PO; Hellman M; Sennerby L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):315-22. PubMed ID: 18548929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Mandibles grafted with fresh-frozen bone: an evaluation of implant outcome.
    Carinci F; Brunelli G; Zollino I; Franco M; Viscioni A; Rigo L; Guidi R; Strohmenger L
    Implant Dent; 2009 Feb; 18(1):86-95. PubMed ID: 19212241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Performance of dental implants after staged sinus floor elevation procedures: 5-year results of a prospective study in partially edentulous patients.
    Bornstein MM; Chappuis V; von Arx T; Buser D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1034-43. PubMed ID: 18828820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Immediate provisionalization of single-tooth implants in fresh-extraction sites at the maxillary esthetic zone: up to 6 years of follow-up.
    Mijiritsky E; Mardinger O; Mazor Z; Chaushu G
    Implant Dent; 2009 Aug; 18(4):326-33. PubMed ID: 19667821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Replacement of mandibular molars with single-unit restorations supported by wide-body implants: immediate versus delayed loading. A randomized controlled study.
    Schincaglia GP; Marzola R; Giovanni GF; Chiara CS; Scotti R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(3):474-80. PubMed ID: 18700371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.