These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18272343)

  • 1. Biomechanical evaluation of the consolidation period of alveolar distraction osteogenesis with three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Veziroglu F; Yilmaz D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 May; 37(5):448-52. PubMed ID: 18272343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of different inter-implant distances on the stress distribution around endosseous implants in posterior mandible: a 3D finite element analysis.
    Simşek B; Erkmen E; Yilmaz D; Eser A
    Med Eng Phys; 2006 Apr; 28(3):199-213. PubMed ID: 15979921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of horizontal alveolar distraction osteogenesis for implant placement in a narrow alveolar ridge: a case report.
    Takahashi T; Funaki K; Shintani H; Haruoka T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):291-4. PubMed ID: 15101603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Selection of the distraction implant length with improved biomechanical properties by three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Gao J; Li T; Hou XC; Wang Z; Kong L; Chen JH
    J Oral Rehabil; 2011 Apr; 38(4):270-7. PubMed ID: 20819137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical effect of crestal bone osteoplasty before implant placement: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Hudieb M; Kasugai S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Feb; 40(2):200-6. PubMed ID: 21131179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Alveolar ridge augmentation by distraction osteogenesis.
    Rachmiel A; Srouji S; Peled M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Dec; 30(6):510-7. PubMed ID: 11829233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.
    Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Results and complications of alveolar distraction osteogenesis to enhance vertical bone height.
    Günbay T; Koyuncu BO; Akay MC; Sipahi A; Tekin U
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 May; 105(5):e7-13. PubMed ID: 18442738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computer-simulated bi-directional alveolar distraction osteogenesis.
    Kanno T; Mitsugi M; Sukegawa S; Hosoe M; Furuki Y
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Dec; 19(12):1211-8. PubMed ID: 19040435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Immediate loading of dental implants placed in distracted bone: a case report.
    Degidi M; Pieri F; Marchetti C; Piattelli A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(3):448-54. PubMed ID: 15214233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical effects of a maxillary implant in the augmented sinus: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Huang HL; Fuh LJ; Ko CC; Hsu JT; Chen CC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):455-62. PubMed ID: 19587867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Distraction osteogenesis versus autogenous onlay grafting. Part I: outcome of implant integration.
    Perry M; Hodges N; Hallmon DW; Rees T; Opperman LA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(5):695-702. PubMed ID: 16274142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Osteogenesis distraction and platelet-rich plasma: combined use in restoration of severe atrophic mandible. Long-term results.
    Robiony M; Zorzan E; Polini F; Sembronio S; Toro C; Politi M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1202-10. PubMed ID: 18983325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of extraosseous devices designed for vertical distraction of extreme resorbed mandibles on backward rotation of upper bone segments.
    Perdijk FB; Meijer GJ; van Strijen PJ; Koole R
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 47(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 18547695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Histomorphometric analysis of delayed implantation after horizontal distraction osteogenesis of the mandible in dogs.
    Sun JR; Kim SG; Moon SY; Lim SC; Ong JL
    Implant Dent; 2009 Oct; 18(5):413-9. PubMed ID: 22129959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the cylinder implant thread height and width: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Kong L; Hu K; Li D; Song Y; Yang J; Wu Z; Liu B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 18416414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical optimisation of the length ratio of the two endosseous portions in distraction implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Gao Y; Li YF; Shao B; Li T; Xia N; Xu LX; Wang ZY; Kong L
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 50(6):e86-92. PubMed ID: 22153654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bone response to functioning implants in dog mandibular alveolar ridges augmented with distraction osteogenesis.
    Block MS; Almerico B; Crawford C; Gardiner D; Chang A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(3):342-51. PubMed ID: 9638004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of different orthodontic devices for mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis: a finite element study.
    Boccaccio A; Lamberti L; Pappalettere C; Cozzani M; Siciliani G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Aug; 134(2):260-9. PubMed ID: 18675208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.