These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18272854)

  • 1. Estimation of accuracy and bias in genetic evaluations with genetic groups using sampling.
    Hickey JM; Keane MG; Kenny DA; Cromie AR; Mulder HA; Veerkamp RF
    J Anim Sci; 2008 May; 86(5):1047-56. PubMed ID: 18272854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of methods for computing approximate accuracies of predicted breeding values in maternal random regression models for growth traits in beef cattle.
    Sánchez JP; Misztal I; Bertrand JK
    J Anim Sci; 2008 May; 86(5):1057-66. PubMed ID: 18203980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genetic parameters for EUROP carcass traits within different groups of cattle in Ireland.
    Hickey JM; Keane MG; Kenny DA; Cromie AR; Veerkamp RF
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Feb; 85(2):314-21. PubMed ID: 17235018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of an approximate REML algorithm for parameter estimation in a multitrait, multiple across-country evaluation model: a simulation study.
    Tarrés J; Liu Z; Ducrocq V; Reinhardt F; Reents R
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Oct; 90(10):4846-55. PubMed ID: 17881708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genetic evaluation of growth in a multibreed beef cattle population using random regression-linear spline models.
    Sánchez JP; Misztal I; Aguilar I; Bertrand JK
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Feb; 86(2):267-77. PubMed ID: 17965329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in crossbred beef cattle.
    Mujibi FD; Nkrumah JD; Durunna ON; Stothard P; Mah J; Wang Z; Basarab J; Plastow G; Crews DH; Moore SS
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Nov; 89(11):3353-61. PubMed ID: 21642493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Changes in connectedness over time in alternative sheep sire referencing schemes.
    Kuehn LA; Notter DR; Nieuwhof GJ; Lewis RM
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Mar; 86(3):536-44. PubMed ID: 18073292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Combining genetic test information and correlated phenotypic records for breeding value estimation.
    Spangler ML; Bertrand JK; Rekaya R
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Mar; 85(3):641-9. PubMed ID: 17085722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of prediction of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake and carcass and meat quality traits in Bos taurus, Bos indicus, and composite beef cattle.
    Bolormaa S; Pryce JE; Kemper K; Savin K; Hayes BJ; Barendse W; Zhang Y; Reich CM; Mason BA; Bunch RJ; Harrison BE; Reverter A; Herd RM; Tier B; Graser HU; Goddard ME
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Jul; 91(7):3088-104. PubMed ID: 23658330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genetic relationships between growth and carcass traits and profitability in Japanese Brown cattle.
    Kahi AK; Oguni T; Sumio Y; Hirooka H
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Feb; 85(2):348-55. PubMed ID: 17235019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The accuracies of DNA-based estimates of genetic merit derived from Angus or multibreed beef cattle training populations.
    Weber KL; Drake DJ; Taylor JF; Garrick DJ; Kuehn LA; Thallman RM; Schnabel RD; Snelling WM; Pollak EJ; Van Eenennaam AL
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4191-202. PubMed ID: 22871929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of population structure on estimates of direct and maternal parameters.
    Heydarpour M; Schaeffer LR; Yazdi MH
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2008 Apr; 125(2):89-99. PubMed ID: 18363974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genetic change results from selection on an economic breeding objective in beef cattle.
    Enns RM; Nicoll GB
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Dec; 86(12):3348-57. PubMed ID: 18469047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. National cattle evaluation system for combined analysis of carcass characteristics and indicator traits recorded by using ultrasound in Angus cattle.
    MacNeil MD; Northcutt SL
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Oct; 86(10):2518-24. PubMed ID: 18539834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Data subsetting strategies for estimation of across-country genetic correlations.
    Jorjani H; Emanuelson U; Fikse WF
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Mar; 88(3):1214-24. PubMed ID: 15738255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetic analysis of calf market weight and carcass traits in Japanese Black cattle.
    Shojo M; Okanishi T; Anada K; Oyama K; Mukai F
    J Anim Sci; 2006 Oct; 84(10):2617-22. PubMed ID: 16971561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evidence of biases in genetic evaluations due to genomic preselection in dairy cattle.
    Patry C; Ducrocq V
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Feb; 94(2):1011-20. PubMed ID: 21257070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracies of genomically estimated breeding values from pure-breed and across-breed predictions in Australian beef cattle.
    Boerner V; Johnston DJ; Tier B
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Oct; 46(1):61. PubMed ID: 25927468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genetic evaluation in the presence of uncertain additive relationships. I. Use of phenotypic information to ascertain paternity.
    Sapp RL; Zhang W; Bertrand JK; Rekaya R
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Oct; 85(10):2391-400. PubMed ID: 17504957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Application of a multiple-trait, multiple-country genetic evaluation model for female fertility traits.
    Nilforooshan MA; Jakobsen JH; Fikse WF; Berglund B; Jorjani H
    J Dairy Sci; 2010 Dec; 93(12):5977-86. PubMed ID: 21094772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.