These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18272854)

  • 21. Prediction accuracy for a simulated maternally affected trait of beef cattle using different genomic evaluation models.
    Lourenco DA; Misztal I; Wang H; Aguilar I; Tsuruta S; Bertrand JK
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Sep; 91(9):4090-8. PubMed ID: 23893997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Estimation of genetic parameters and prediction of breeding values for multivariate threshold and continuous data in a simulated horse population using Gibbs sampling and residual maximum likelihood.
    Stock KF; Hoeschele I; Distl O
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Oct; 124(5):308-19. PubMed ID: 17868084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Retrospective analysis of the accuracy of conversion equations and multiple-trait, across-country evaluations of Holstein bulls used internationally.
    Weigel KA; Powell RL
    J Dairy Sci; 2000 May; 83(5):1081-8. PubMed ID: 10821583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multibreed beef cattle populations derived from deregressed breeding values and phenotypes.
    Weber KL; Thallman RM; Keele JW; Snelling WM; Bennett GL; Smith TP; McDaneld TG; Allan MF; Van Eenennaam AL; Kuehn LA
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4177-90. PubMed ID: 22767091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison between genomic predictions using daughter yield deviation and conventional estimated breeding value as response variables.
    Guo G; Lund MS; Zhang Y; Su G
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2010 Dec; 127(6):423-32. PubMed ID: 21077966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Short communication: Genomic selection using a multi-breed, across-country reference population.
    Pryce JE; Gredler B; Bolormaa S; Bowman PJ; Egger-Danner C; Fuerst C; Emmerling R; Sölkner J; Goddard ME; Hayes BJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 May; 94(5):2625-30. PubMed ID: 21524555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Across-breed adjustment factors for expected progeny differences for carcass traits.
    Van Vleck LD; Cundiff LV; Wheeler TL; Shackelford SD; Koohmaraie M
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Jun; 85(6):1369-76. PubMed ID: 17339411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of clustering herds with small-sized contemporary groups in dairy cattle genetic evaluations.
    Vasconcelos J; Santos F; Bagnato A; Carvalheira J
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Jan; 91(1):377-84. PubMed ID: 18096962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Experimental selection for calving ease and postnatal growth in seven cattle populations. I. Changes in estimated breeding values.
    Bennett GL
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Sep; 86(9):2093-102. PubMed ID: 18441073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of carcass price fluctuations on genetic and economic evaluation of carcass traits in Japanese Black cattle.
    Ibi T; Kahi AK; Hirooka H
    J Anim Sci; 2006 Dec; 84(12):3204-11. PubMed ID: 17093212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Genetic parameters for calving ease, gestation length, and birth weight in Charolais cattle.
    Mujibi FD; Crews DH
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Sep; 87(9):2759-66. PubMed ID: 19465493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Multivariate analyses of carcass traits for Angus cattle fitting reduced rank and factor analytic models.
    Meyer K
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Apr; 124(2):50-64. PubMed ID: 17488355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Genetic evaluation of beef carcass data using different endpoint adjustments.
    Rumph JM; Shafer WR; Crews DH; Enns RM; Lipsey RJ; Quaas RL; Pollak EJ
    J Anim Sci; 2007 May; 85(5):1120-5. PubMed ID: 17224467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Animal model and multiple trait BLUP applied in poultry genetic evaluation].
    Pang H; Wu CX; Zhang Y; Gong GF; Bi YH
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 1989; 16(4):291-8. PubMed ID: 2486251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Genetics of efficient feed utilization and national cattle evaluation: a review.
    Crews DH
    Genet Mol Res; 2005 Jun; 4(2):152-65. PubMed ID: 16110437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Accuracies of direct genomic breeding values in Hereford beef cattle using national or international training populations.
    Saatchi M; Ward J; Garrick DJ
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Apr; 91(4):1538-51. PubMed ID: 23345550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Short communication: Quantifying bias in a single-trait international model ignoring covariances from multiple-trait national models.
    Nilforooshan MA; Fikse WF; Berglund B; Jakobsen JH; Jorjani H
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 May; 94(5):2631-6. PubMed ID: 21524556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Estimation of variance components and prediction of breeding values using pooled data.
    Biscarini F; Bovenhuis H; van Arendonk JA
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Nov; 86(11):2845-52. PubMed ID: 18539838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Genetic parameters for measures of energetic efficiency of bulls and their relationships with carcass traits of field progeny in Japanese Black cattle.
    Hoque MA; Hosono M; Oikawa T; Suzuki K
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Jan; 87(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 18765855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of predictor traits on accuracy of genomic breeding values for feed intake based on a limited cow reference population.
    Pszczola M; Veerkamp RF; de Haas Y; Wall E; Strabel T; Calus MP
    Animal; 2013 Nov; 7(11):1759-68. PubMed ID: 23915541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.